What's your 'post like' record?

SemperFiCat

Heisman
Mar 2, 2009
14,566
30,005
0
Divide your 'likes' by your total number of posts. Maybe not scientifically accurate because people post in different forums, just thought it could be a fun thread.

I'm at 67%
 

LineSkiCat14

Heisman
Aug 5, 2015
39,078
61,368
113
I checked and I’m at 66%, but then I know that’s not accurate because a significant number of my posts took place before Likes were available.

I actually think I’m closer to 100%.

Didn't some people's transfer over though? Like Willy had some ungodly percentage I remember.. like 2:1 LIKE ratio..

If you can't muster a 50%, you're doing something wrong.
 

ORCAT

Heisman
Jan 6, 2003
24,669
11,960
113
I think I had over 20,000 posts on Rivals before "Likes" were an option. I've been around since 1999 and had over 25,000 posts on the old Kentucky Sports Report/WildcatChat, and then thousands more on the old Rivals site before it went under the first time.

Same story as you pretty much. Been around these boards since 90's but nowhere near the total posts or likes as some others. I don't see how you can spend that much time on here posting to get some of the numbers some posters have in such a short time.
 

ib4ky_rivals111873

All-Conference
Dec 18, 2005
1,321
2,300
113
153%
 

Blue63Madison

All-American
May 21, 2002
35,727
6,826
0
Divide your 'likes' by your total number of posts. Maybe not scientifically accurate because people post in different forums, just thought it could be a fun thread.

I'm at 67%
I quit posting in 2015, after my brother died. He was my UK sports — and all other sports — sidekick. I lost interest after that. Just recently got back into the message board stuff.
 

GonzoCat90

Heisman
Mar 30, 2009
32,377
34,559
0
I actually think it hurt the quality of the board. Too many people are looking for a quick one-liner instead of actual conversation. We're all guilty of it.

I wish there were an up/down vote feature that would push terrible posts to the bottom or cause them to be hidden and better stuff to the top.
 

Kai Slater

All-American
Jan 30, 2015
1,762
5,710
0
I have more "likes" than I do total posts.

With my relatively low number of posts compared to the date that I joined, I've been labelled a "troll" and a "hater" and a "UL Troll Fan" and so on and so forth. Is it when I finally hit 1000 posts that my postings are valid and Im no longer a troll? Or, what is the number that everyone throws out there?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mr_GG

TIE543

All-Conference
Nov 1, 2015
3,390
4,273
73
I actually think it hurt the quality of the board. Too many people are looking for a quick one-liner instead of actual conversation. We're all guilty of it.

I wish there were an up/down vote feature that would push terrible posts to the bottom or cause them to be hidden and better stuff to the top.
If Reddit is any indicator, an upvote/downvote system would just bring out more of the one-liner stuff.

Oh and also, 91.5%
 

Drcats2025

Heisman
Nov 13, 2012
7,991
15,885
93
I actually think it hurt the quality of the board. Too many people are looking for a quick one-liner instead of actual conversation. We're all guilty of it.

I wish there were an up/down vote feature that would push terrible posts to the bottom or cause them to be hidden and better stuff to the top.
Now there’s a good idea, and so much truth to your second sentence. Guilty myself.
 

kyboy1998_rivals34276

All-American
Mar 20, 2006
9,339
8,773
61
58.5 even though I had thousands of post before likes were an option.

It’s also a stupid measure. Just go to the Paddock D-league or NOB thread and it’s a like fest circle jerk. Good way for some of you to pad your stats that think that matters.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mr_GG