what's the o-lines problem?

TruHusker

All-Conference
Sep 21, 2001
12,115
2,397
98
I am an eternal optimist. Don’t really need more than that.
I will buy that. Just the word "thrilled" would indicate a high degree of satisfaction based on something tangible. So, essentially you would have been thrilled with whoever they hired?
 
Last edited:

trooper141

Redshirt
Feb 3, 2017
2,123
7
0
I will buy that. Just the word "thrilled" would indicate a high degree of satisfzction.based on something tangible. So, essentially you would have been thrilled with whoever they hired?

Thrilled for the Raiola hire would be accurate. I like who he has studied under. I like the fact that people who he worked with spoke highly of him. I like that he played at Wisconsin.

I believe he will be a good recruiter.

I actually believe we have the right OL in place and with some tweaking of technique alongside a more aggressive approach to blocking we will have a strong OL even if we do not get transfers.

I think we will see a different technique with using our hands and feet. Look for more punching technique rather than engaging and grabbing. I think our initial drop step will be different. I think our double teams will be tighter on the hip and with more drive. I believe we will run through our blocks rather than engage and seal/chop. (Watch at the Spring game and get back to me if I nailed these).

There are a few that were mentioned as potential hires that I would have been much less than thrilled with.

That’s about it for now.
 
Last edited:

redwine65

All-Conference
Jun 23, 2010
10,846
2,161
113
it needs a playstation in its hands
 

Redscarlet

Heisman
Jun 17, 2001
32,993
11,001
113
Thrilled for the Raiola hire would be accurate. I like who he has studied under. I like the fact that people who he worked with spoke highly of him. I like that he played at Wisconsin.

I believe he will be a good recruiter.

I actually believe we have the right OL in place and with some tweaking of technique alongside a more aggressive approach to blocking we will have a strong OL even if we do not get transfers.

I think we will see a different technique with using our hands and feet. Look for more punching technique rather than engaging and grabbing. I think our initial drop step will be different. I think our double teams will be tighter on the hip and with more drive. I believe we will run through our blocks rather than engage and seal/chop. (Watch at the Spring game and get back to me if I nailed these).

There are a few that were mentioned as potential hires that I would have been much less than thrilled with.

That’s about it for now.
Your more knowledge on this hire so I’ll take your word for it..

Hope you’re spot on…
 

TruHusker

All-Conference
Sep 21, 2001
12,115
2,397
98
Thrilled for the Raiola hire would be accurate. I like who he has studied under. I like the fact that people who he worked with spoke highly of him. I like that he played at Wisconsin.

I believe he will be a good recruiter.

I actually believe we have the right OL in place and with some tweaking of technique alongside a more aggressive approach to blocking we will have a strong OL even if we do not get transfers.

I think we will see a different technique with using our hands and feet. Look for more punching technique rather than engaging and grabbing. I think our initial drop step will be different. I think our double teams will be tighter on the hip and with more drive. I believe we will run through our blocks rather than engage and seal/chop. (Watch at the Spring game and get back to me if I nailed these).

There are a few that were mentioned as potential hires that I would have been much less than thrilled with.

That’s about it for now.
Austin employed and was constantly talking about the initial punch. Most OL coaches I know, teach that, but then what? We seemed to lose contact and didn't drive. Since no one knows a darn thing aside from some clippings, about Raiola, I would hope to see a few things.

1. Every coach stresses hand placement, that is a given. What is he going to do differently/better than Austin?
2. Footwork is also on every coaches drill list - can we at least learn to turn a defender away from ball side?
3. I would also like to see us employ some combo blocks which we haven't seem to do or at least weren't very good at.
4. Lastly, drive the D player back, not just hit and react.
5. Are we going to zone block? No one has answered that question.
6. How will the drop step be different? It seemed after that initial drop, we lost contact and DEs would scream around our tackles.
 

trooper141

Redshirt
Feb 3, 2017
2,123
7
0
Austin employed and was constantly talking about the initial punch. Most OL coaches I know, teach that, but then what? We seemed to lose contact and didn't drive. Since no one knows a darn thing aside from some clippings, about Raiola, I would hope to see a few things.

1. Every coach stresses hand placement, that is a given. What is he going to do differently/better than Austin?
2. Footwork is also on every coaches drill list - can we at least learn to turn a defender away from ball side?
3. I would also like to see us employ some combo blocks which we haven't seem to do or at least weren't very good at.
4. Lastly, drive the D player back, not just hit and react.
5. Are we going to zone block? No one has answered that question.
6. How will the drop step be different? It seemed after that initial drop, we lost contact and DEs would scream around our tackles.

This is just a guess from watching the people he worked with but here goes.
1- punching will be more than just the initial punch then grab. The punching will be continuous through the pass block.

2- as mentioned I think we employ more of a running through the DL / LB. Not the hit and short chopping steps.

3- On combo blocks / double teams watch how close our OL hips are compared to past years

4- noted above in 2

5- not sure

6- watch to see if we change the angle of our first drop step to force defender a little wider. Not the almost straight back first step. Might be pretty subtle.

Thanks for the actual technique talk !
 
Jan 14, 2017
3,160
493
47
Who cares if they maxed out on college? Sounds like a good recipe for college success to me. Sure beats having guys play well in the NFL that didn’t do a thing here, like we have now.
Which shows coaching/player development is are issues number 1, 2, and 3.
 

NUinnwks

Senior
Aug 4, 2003
1,894
412
83
For the most part it’s been lack of coaching and talent evaluation. Austin wasn’t a good coach, but we’ve had a bad run of bad coaches. Or at least their style didn’t mesh well with the offensive philosophy, if we even had one, in some circumstances. Remember all the Centers we’ve had that lacked size and athleticism? That’s a horrible start for your Oline. How many years did we hear, “they’re young, or they’re injured,” only to see the same guys trotted out there. Sickening!
I left out some names, but how many of these guys would’ve played for elite college teams?
John Raridon, Boe Wilson, Cole Conrad, Hunter Miller, Matt and Will Farniok, Matt Sichterman, Jake Cotton
Broc Bando, Brian Thorson, Mike Huff, Andy Christensen, Mike Smith, Cruz Barrett, Keith Williams
Mark Pelini, Mike Moudy, Mike Caputo, Cole Pensick, Andrew Rodriguez, Mike Smith, DJ Jones, Brandon Chapek, Robby Painter, Paul Thurston, Ryan Reeves, Ryan Freudenburg, Mike Moudy, David Knevel, Sam Gahn, Gerald Foster, Dylan Utter, Jalin Barnett, Zach Hannon.
Your point is well taken. But there were still some notable players among those you pointed out, who may have merited consideration by the elite teams.

Of all you mentioned, Gerald Foster was a solid guard that NU had a difficult time replacing, a 2 year starter, honorable mention all big 10 in 2017, and NU Lineman of the year in 2018.

Matt Farniok had his ups and downs, but did his coaching prepare him well for performance on the field, and was he playing the best position at OTackle instead of OGuard? Still he was a 3 year starter, and honorable mention all big 10 in 2020.

Jake Cotton and Mike Moudy were OGuards in 2014 - Abdullah’s senior year - a time of offensive success. Cotton was honorable mention All Big 10 honorable mention and a 2 year starter.

Broc Bando still may be a contributor if he continues at NU.

Cole Pensick was 2nd Team All Big 10 in 2013 and on the Remington watchlist that year.

Andrew Rodriguez was hm All conf in 2013, and Keith Williams was Honorable Mention All Big 10 in 2009-2010.

Others of these players like David Knevel had potential but injuries hurt their playing time.

NU would be ecstatic to have Ryan Reeves available to play center again in 2022.

Even Paul Thurston who transferred to Colorado State University his senior year was Honorable Mention All Mountain West Conference in 2016.

So yes, your point is well taken that these folks did not make All America. As far as being recruited by elite teams, Foster, Williams, Rodriguez, Pensick, and likely others would have merited it in hindsight based on their careers.

We at NU need desperately some very good OLine coaching to develop thes players to the full potential. Let’s hope Raiola connects, communicates, and brings out the maximum potential and performance of these players.
 
Nov 28, 2016
3,382
803
92
It’s because they are not tough enough and as others have pointed out…they are mentally weak. They have a ‘meh attitude’ after losing games. Not sure the reasons behind all of that…Millenial generation? laziness? apathy? Non Nebraska kids? (Back in the day when we were a football school, many of the O-line kids worked on farms and understood the culture here).

Regardless of the reasons this Offense will not hum unless the O-line gets fixed. I think cutting ties with the last O-line coach and putting new hire Raiola will be an improvement from the start. That last guy was Jr High level (barely)
 

Kakdawg

Heisman
Sep 8, 2004
35,387
15,528
113
Definitely want a line full of pricks. Dudes rag dolling the general population at bars on the weekend. That's a telltale sign of a good line.


We recruit too many "good guys" lol. I understand the value of having good young men in the program. I also think there is value in having some pricks. Some *** hole types who are borderline dirty. There is a thing and a yang to all good teams. We need more guys who don't give a F and are willing to put their boots on someone's neck and enjoy it. I wanna see us recruit more nasty and less ideal height,weight, length. Imo of course.


Holla
 

TruHusker

All-Conference
Sep 21, 2001
12,115
2,397
98
Nasty and all those intangibles everyone is hung up on are great and all but if the player is not taught what to do and how to do it correctly, it won't matter. In fact, they would be running on more emotion than technique and that won't work.

Obviously, I want someone with the attitude of never wanting to get beat physically but they also have to have other attributes. Funny how everyone on here is an expert on hips for a DB and moves for a RB and arm strength for a QB but when it comes to a lineman they want nasty! Oh and long arms.
 

trooper141

Redshirt
Feb 3, 2017
2,123
7
0
We recruit too many "good guys" lol. I understand the value of having good young men in the program. I also think there is value in having some pricks. Some *** hole types who are borderline dirty. There is a thing and a yang to all good teams. We need more guys who don't give a F and are willing to put their boots on someone's neck and enjoy it. I wanna see us recruit more nasty and less ideal height,weight, length. Imo of course.


Holla

Or both. And I think we have them on the roster currently
 

Kakdawg

Heisman
Sep 8, 2004
35,387
15,528
113
Or both. And I think we have them on the roster currently


I wish it would show up on Saturdays. I actually seen it with Cam this year but other than him I haven't seen a nasty OL for us in a long time.



Holla
 

cubsker_rivals142943

All-Conference
May 29, 2003
18,603
3,797
0
We recruit too many "good guys" lol. I understand the value of having good young men in the program. I also think there is value in having some pricks. Some *** hole types who are borderline dirty. There is a thing and a yang to all good teams. We need more guys who don't give a F and are willing to put their boots on someone's neck and enjoy it. I wanna see us recruit more nasty and less ideal height,weight, length. Imo of course.


Holla

I've said for years that I don't want us to recruit criminals, just guys that at least know a few criminals.
 

bshirt73

Senior
Aug 31, 2014
2,853
806
0
I intentionally watch our O line, each player on the rewind of most games over the last three years. I pretty much gave up on it this year, it was so depressing.

Overall the technique needs to improve drastically. Footwork is atrocious. Tackles get beat off the edge too easily and when we have an opportunity to seal a block by just stepping to the run side, we don't do and allow the D player to slip off and make a play.

Austin seemed to be about strike hard and then read. There wasn't much stake and drive, keep the arms locked and stay engaged. We let opposing DEs and edge rushers get almost to the QB before we make contact, by that time the tackle is backed way up and has given too much ground.

We have bee horrible defending the blitz. We have 5 blockers and it seems no matter how many they send, we leave someone free.

The entire O line doesn't seem to work together. We will likely go to more zone blocking which will be a change and for crying out loud can we get someone to the second level? How many times were our backs hit at the LOS. We need to get more push in the short yardage situations.

Lastly, it seems like we went overboard thinking we had to have Jolly green giant for tackles and even inside linemen. If you aren't 6'8" or 9, you are too short. I have heard over and over how we look for the length. Well, just look at the linemen who were drafted last year, you won't find guys like that.

Really lastly, the communication needs to improve as well. It starts with the center making line calls. I just think Jurgens will struggle with that in the pro game.

Amen. I thought our OLine would be ready to row this year. How could I be so horribly wrong?
 

bshirt73

Senior
Aug 31, 2014
2,853
806
0
It’s because they are not tough enough and as others have pointed out…they are mentally weak. They have a ‘meh attitude’ after losing games. Not sure the reasons behind all of that…Millenial generation? laziness? apathy? Non Nebraska kids? (Back in the day when we were a football school, many of the O-line kids worked on farms and understood the culture here).

Regardless of the reasons this Offense will not hum unless the O-line gets fixed. I think cutting ties with the last O-line coach and putting new hire Raiola will be an improvement from the start. That last guy was Jr High level (barely)

The Oline and our special teams are both so outrageously inept I don't know what to think.
 

10Trvln

All-Conference
Feb 5, 2011
5,581
3,341
0
Your point is well taken. But there were still some notable players among those you pointed out, who may have merited consideration by the elite teams.

Of all you mentioned, Gerald Foster was a solid guard that NU had a difficult time replacing, a 2 year starter, honorable mention all big 10 in 2017, and NU Lineman of the year in 2018.

Matt Farniok had his ups and downs, but did his coaching prepare him well for performance on the field, and was he playing the best position at OTackle instead of OGuard? Still he was a 3 year starter, and honorable mention all big 10 in 2020.

Jake Cotton and Mike Moudy were OGuards in 2014 - Abdullah’s senior year - a time of offensive success. Cotton was honorable mention All Big 10 honorable mention and a 2 year starter.

Broc Bando still may be a contributor if he continues at NU.

Cole Pensick was 2nd Team All Big 10 in 2013 and on the Remington watchlist that year.

Andrew Rodriguez was hm All conf in 2013, and Keith Williams was Honorable Mention All Big 10 in 2009-2010.

Others of these players like David Knevel had potential but injuries hurt their playing time.

NU would be ecstatic to have Ryan Reeves available to play center again in 2022.

Even Paul Thurston who transferred to Colorado State University his senior year was Honorable Mention All Mountain West Conference in 2016.

So yes, your point is well taken that these folks did not make All America. As far as being recruited by elite teams, Foster, Williams, Rodriguez, Pensick, and likely others would have merited it in hindsight based on their careers.

We at NU need desperately some very good OLine coaching to develop thes players to the full potential. Let’s hope Raiola connects, communicates, and brings out the maximum potential and performance of these players.
Foster is a tough one for me. I know he got some accolades but far too many times he let defenders run right by him.

I agree that Farniok’s issues were probably more of a coaching issue and playing out of position.

The deal with Cotton and Moudy really bothers me. Yes we had some offensive success. I wish Ameer would’ve had a much better line than he had. Him and Rex busted their asses for every yard they got. Way too many times our line got manhandled, had defenders in the backfield, it looked like the play would go for no gain, and somehow they made positive yards. That was a constant.
 

oldjar07

All-Conference
Oct 25, 2009
9,466
2,006
113
Pure BS.

Thousands of guys have or are currently playing in the NFL with little to no coaching. You play at the highest levels because you have a talent or want to nobody else has.

There may be coaches and schemes that can draw that out of people, but want to and greatness are already mostly there.

Bo Pelini did a great job with Suh and David but those guys are in the NFL and have stayed in the NFL because of pure assed talent and want to.
Suh and David are the rare exception when it comes to college talent. Most college players never reach the NFL, and they need coaching and development to play at a high level in college. Sure, there's guys who play well even with bad coaching, but they're the exception.
 

Husker88

Senior
Dec 9, 2017
2,194
431
83
Suh and David are the rare exception when it comes to college talent. Most college players never reach the NFL, and they need coaching and development to play at a high level in college. Sure, there's guys who play well even with bad coaching, but they're the exception.

The NFL is about size, speed, and talent.

They don't host a 300 person combine each year to measure physical traits for no reason at all. Measurables make the absolute difference in a game that really is about inches and feet between good, great, and elite.

Ron Meyer was at SMU in the late 70s when they got caught cheating and given the death penalty years later in the 80s. He said something of the sort "I'm not recruiting guys that can play on Saturdays, I'm recruiting guys that can play on Sundays.".

Our very own Bob Devaney said something of the sort of "I don't expect to win enough games to be put on NCAA probation I just want to win enough to warrant an investigation."

You can build all the 2 and 3 stars you want. You ain't winning **** without top end talent at a number of positions when you need to field 44 or more in your 2 deep. The same teams aren't winning conference and national championships nowadays in the best P5 conferences because they develop players better than everybody else.
 

oldjar07

All-Conference
Oct 25, 2009
9,466
2,006
113
The NFL is about size, speed, and talent.

They don't host a 300 person combine each year to measure physical traits for no reason at all. Measurables make the absolute difference in a game that really is about inches and feet between good, great, and elite.

Ron Meyer was at SMU in the late 70s when they got caught cheating and given the death penalty years later in the 80s. He said something of the sort "I'm not recruiting guys that can play on Saturdays, I'm recruiting guys that can play on Sundays.".

Our very own Bob Devaney said something of the sort of "I don't expect to win enough games to be put on NCAA probation I just want to win enough to warrant an investigation."

You can build all the 2 and 3 stars you want. You ain't winning **** without top end talent at a number of positions when you need to field 44 or more in your 2 deep. The same teams aren't winning conference and national championships nowadays in the best P5 conferences because they develop players better than everybody else.
We were successful over a long period of time getting the most out of the talent we had. A lot of those guys Osborne had that were complete studs didn't do anything in the NFL. Yes, that's exactly what you do to win championships. Alabama develops players better than anyone else is the biggest reason why they win.
 

Husker88

Senior
Dec 9, 2017
2,194
431
83
We were successful over a long period of time getting the most out of the talent we had. A lot of those guys Osborne had that were complete studs didn't do anything in the NFL. Yes, that's exactly what you do to win championships. Alabama develops players better than anyone else is the biggest reason why they win.

Saban recruits the best players, has them compete to find the best, and then plays the best.

They aren't developing guys outside of making them compete to be in the NFL.

90% of the guys going to Bama are going there to be in the NFL. Winning is secondary.
 

dinglefritz

Heisman
Jan 14, 2011
51,460
12,865
78
I've said for years that I don't want us to recruit criminals, just guys that at least know a few criminals.
I had 2 friends of mine from middle school do time for murder. Would that work? They were even in my confirmation class at my church. I'm 63 but I would give it a go.
 

dinglefritz

Heisman
Jan 14, 2011
51,460
12,865
78
Saban recruits the best players, has them compete to find the best, and then plays the best.

They aren't developing guys outside of making them compete to be in the NFL.

90% of the guys going to Bama are going there to be in the NFL. Winning is secondary.
Oh I think they're going there to win too but there is no doubt that Bama is an NFL prep school. Even LSU's backup linemen look different than what we start with.
 
Last edited:

AgntX

Junior
Feb 18, 2005
1,338
357
0
Damn guys, you want the players now to play like the guys did back when Tom was coach? IT was ROIDS that made them strong and mean, after 2002 the testing got real and now look at the arms of our line, no muscles at all! plus kids are pussies these days too! Quit thinking about the past, its gonzo! i seen the guys from Fordham had big arms! wonder what they do, plus we need to quit practicing in the morning, they don't do enough work then!
 

leodisflowers

Senior
Feb 25, 2011
14,801
808
0
Damn guys, you want the players now to play like the guys did back when Tom was coach? IT was ROIDS that made them strong and mean, after 2002 the testing got real and now look at the arms of our line, no muscles at all! plus kids are pussies these days too! Quit thinking about the past, its gonzo! i seen the guys from Fordham had big arms! wonder what they do, plus we need to quit practicing in the morning, they don't do enough work then!
In English?