Here is where I fall on this...
We are either committed to competing on a SEC/National level or we are not. If we are, then we have to make the decision now to let Joe go, because the gap between the haves and the have not's is not only going to get bigger but it's going to grow at a very fast rate with the paying of players coming down the line and schools beginning to tell the NCAA to go 17 themselves. If we are not committed to competing then keeping him is the decision we will make. The quicker we decide the better off we will be. I truly believe that the right coach can change everything in a short period of time. You bring in the right coach (no matter the cost), the publicity comes, the recruits come, the national respect comes, and the contending seasons come.
I have never understood the cost factor when it comes to coaches. If you hire the right coach who has name recognition and national perception respect, for say 7-10 million, you make your money back before he ever steps foot on campus. The perception changes overnight with the fan base, the national media, and the recruits. Football is your money making sport and it really does not matter what you pay a coach, you are not going to go into the red in football if you have the right coach (LT reference). I have never understood the trying to get a bargain or finding a diamond in the rough mentality. Go offer the top names in the industry and offer them more than they are currently making, and make them say no. At the very least it would show that we are serious about winning and arent willing to settle.
It is just hard for me to see people saying we should give Joe another year when it is clear that he is NEVER going compete in the SEC. Even if he were to get us to a 7 wins a season consistency, that is still nowhere near competing...that would put you at 4th in the West at best, and no better than 6th overall in the SEC and we are still duking it out in the same mid tier bowl games . That just isnt very good, its quite literally average. I also do not understand the "MSU will never compete consitantly" mentality. IF that is the case, then why do we even bother? If thats the case we should just become a KY or UCLA or USCe and pour all resources towards Baseball and Basketball....that at least costs less overall and you get more for your money.
I want MSU to succeed more than anything and truly believe that we can...we are in SEC, we are in the South, we have the facilities, we just need the right coach. But it cant be a no-name diamond in the rough bargain, and it certainly cant be JoeMo...It has to be a name and it has to turn heads. I realize this is probably ridiculous, but I wish it wasnt...I realize it won't happen, but I sure wish it would!