What if....?

LouisiAaron

All-Conference
Feb 15, 2017
2,305
1,069
3
What if we never started recruiting Trevon and stuck with Tremont Waters? He was a heavy Duke lean and it was his "dream school". People seem to look over him over at LSU but he's right up there with Trae Young to me. Trae Young just has more talent around him which opens things up for him more. Not to mention his usage rate is close to 40% which is crazy high. (Bagley is at 27%). Tremont is a legit baller, though. Can you imagine him on this team with his shooting, passing and defensive ability? I'm glad we got Trevon. But I think our offense would be even more UNSTOPPABLE if Tremont came. I love to watch him play; even though I hate LSU. Once again I'm not saying I wish we got him over Trevon but if you put that dude on this Duke team we would be LETHAL
 
  • Like
Reactions: GlenOaks

SwatX1

Heisman
Jan 4, 2011
8,338
10,583
68
The only thing I can say I guess is that I'm sure the staff looked closely at both and seen something that made them want Duval more? I don't know, just guessing. I haven't seen Waters play.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dbav

LouisiAaron

All-Conference
Feb 15, 2017
2,305
1,069
3
The only thing I can say I guess is that I'm sure the staff looked closely at both and seen something that made them want Duval more? I don't know, just guessing. I haven't seen Waters play.

Definitely Tre's length and explosiveness. His upside is better as well. But waters is something serious. Just watch him play once. He's impressive
 

nets on nets on nets

All-American
Jun 4, 2015
4,162
5,515
0
I don’t think we even need our offense to improve another gear, and yes Waters shooting would do that. May just give our defense more of an excuse to be lackadaisical.

Duval is such a better athlete, and bigger, his defensive potential is much higher than Waters’. And we need guys to lock down on D.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dattier

LouisiAaron

All-Conference
Feb 15, 2017
2,305
1,069
3
I don’t think we even need our offense to improve another gear, and yes Waters shooting would do that. May just give our defense more of an excuse to be lackadaisical.

Duval is such a better athlete, and bigger, his defensive potential is much higher than Waters’. And we need guys to lock down on D.

Waters is a pretty pesky defender. I would take Tre Duval because at his best he would give us more than Waters. But if Tre didn't call Duke we would have Waters and we would be a really good shooting team. Our offense would be NASTY NASTY. It's DIRTY NASTY right now
 

bradythegoat2

Redshirt
Jan 7, 2018
51
8
0
I don’t think we even need our offense to improve another gear, and yes Waters shooting would do that. May just give our defense more of an excuse to be lackadaisical.

Duval is such a better athlete, and bigger, his defensive potential is much higher than Waters’. And we need guys to lock down on D.

I mean the staff before the season was correct to take the higher ranked Duval and am sure they still like that decision. However, Waters is just miles ahead offensively and is actually a better defender too (leading SEC in SPG)... I don't think you can go wrong with either. Also hard to project what Waters would look like at Duke - he's a great shooter though.
 

Dattier

All-American
Sep 1, 2003
9,374
5,634
0
I would take Tre Duval because at his best he would give us more than Waters. But if Tre didn't call Duke we would have Waters and we would be a really good shooting team.
How about "taking" Tre b/c he's who we have and not waste time w/ "but ifs"?
 

Dattier

All-American
Sep 1, 2003
9,374
5,634
0
The whole point of the thread is to compare the two, bud.
That's kind of like comparing one woman to another while you're in the middle of a date with one of them. It's not recruiting season anymore. It's a done deal. We're likely to have Tre for only a little over half a season more, and you want to waste time wishing we had someone else? No, thanks.

It's a dumb thread.
 

Dattier

All-American
Sep 1, 2003
9,374
5,634
0
Yeah but if we're going to throw out hypotheticals, that would be my choice. Have a feeling the last 2 years would have gone a little differently too.
I don't have an issue w/ wishing guys who were once here had stayed longer. Pining away for some other team's PG and specifically in comparison to our PG is poor form.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Showenuff

topps coach

All-Conference
Feb 6, 2008
20,901
4,122
0
That's kind of like comparing one woman to another while you're in the middle of a date with one of them. It's not recruiting season anymore. It's a done deal. We're likely to have Tre for only a little over half a season more, and you want to waste time wishing we had someone else? No, thanks.

It's a dumb thread.
Are you talking from experience Dat? If so you are either a brave man or totally crazy lol
 

LouisiAaron

All-Conference
Feb 15, 2017
2,305
1,069
3
How about "taking" Tre b/c he's who we have and not waste time w/ "but ifs"?

How about if you don’t like the thread then just pass by it? That’s how it usually works. You wasted your time commenting on something that waste time according to you. Doesn’t make sense right?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mac9192

GlenOaks

All-Conference
Mar 10, 2017
1,243
2,652
113
I’m glad the blue bloods passed on him. Kid is making LSU relevant again