What comes first under AOC's "doomsday" prediction?

[atlkvb]

We only have 12 years to win World War II. So will we loose 45 million plus Souls before we spend whatever it takes to control "climate change" or will we put her in charge to solve the problem before 2031? Can she tell us how much it's going to cost at least, and what the plan to control the climate is?

 

[rog1187]

We only have 12 years to win World War II. So will we loose 45 million plus Souls before we spend whatever it takes to control "climate change" or will we put her in charge to solve the problem before 2031? Can she tell us how much it's going to cost at least, and what the plan to control the climate is?

Careful now or she and her libtard cronies will threaten you with physical violence...right after they tell you that Trump and his supporters are violent.

 

[WVU82_rivals]

 

[eerdoc]

We only have 12 years to win World War II. So will we loose 45 million plus Souls before we spend whatever it takes to control "climate change" or will we put her in charge to solve the problem before 2031? Can she tell us how much it's going to cost at least, and what the plan to control the climate is?

What a disgrace!
She was available for the media to attach themselves to her and make her look important, while ignoring her lunacy. She is media created and pumped up. They can destroy her in a flash when she is no longer useful to them. The woman is trying to parrot the taking points she is fed but is not smart enough to see the finer points of whatever issues and displayed her lack of real education and understanding of nearly every topic she ventures into. He is personable, but a real dud when it comes to intelligence.

 

[atlkvb]

What a disgrace!
She was available for the media to attach themselves to her and make her look important, while ignoring her lunacy. She is media created and pumped up. They can destroy her in a flash when she is no longer useful to them. The woman is trying to parrot the taking points she is fed but is not smart enough to see the finer points of whatever issues and displayed her lack of real education and understanding of nearly every topic she ventures into. He is personable, but a real dud when it comes to intelligence.

She is the face of the Democratic Socialist party.

 

[atlkvb]

An education system that produces this economically ignorant person is "deplorable"

 

[mule_eer]

What a disgrace!
She was available for the media to attach themselves to her and make her look important, while ignoring her lunacy. She is media created and pumped up. They can destroy her in a flash when she is no longer useful to them. The woman is trying to parrot the taking points she is fed but is not smart enough to see the finer points of whatever issues and displayed her lack of real education and understanding of nearly every topic she ventures into. He is personable, but a real dud when it comes to intelligence.

I think Fox News is really focusing on her right now. Maybe I'm missing it, but I'm not seeing much from her on other sources.

 

[Airport]

I think Fox News is really focusing on her right now. Maybe I'm missing it, but I'm not seeing much from her on other sources.

Just need to ignore her. But, need to respect what she says, cause there are a lot of people who've been dumped into taking out huge loans for art and basket weaving degrees that aren't going to provide enough income to pay off a traffic ticket.

 

[Keyser76]

lmfao, ever wonder why all you rubes are suddenly so interested and seemingly worried about a new freshman from NY too young to run for President? Deflect from the stable genius leading your party maybe? Be afraid, be very afraid!

 

[79eer]

Maybe I'm missing it, but I'm not seeing much from her on other sources.

Not missing anything, MSM ( other sources ) has no desire to expose her. She is an embarrassment to the Democrat Party.

 

[Keyser76]

Not missing anything, MSM ( other sources ) has no desire to expose her. She is an embarrassment to the Democrat Party.

Lol, you guys are lead by Donnie.

 

[eerdoc]

I think Fox News is really focusing on her right now. Maybe I'm missing it, but I'm not seeing much from her on other sources.

Do you watch any of the other fake news cable channels? She is being interview or having appearances covered that you would think she was some major intellect or successful professional. The 'focus' (as you refer to it) on Fox is to counter the nonsense she gushes forth elsewhere. Fox, in their attempt to be much more balanced in their coverage than the other, erroneously named, news channels, covers he latest interviews, etc. where she persist in getting very far out over her skis and displaying her radicalism and unbounded ignorance on nearly every topic into which she leaps. Wonder if she has ever read the constitution or, at least, more that the few percent of the major headings? From listening to her on several occasions I have severe doubts.

 

[WVUBRU]

Do you watch any of the other fake news cable channels? She is being interview or having appearances covered that you would think she was some major intellect or successful professional. The 'focus' (as you refer to it) on Fox is to counter the nonsense she gushes forth elsewhere. Fox, in their attempt to be much more balanced in their coverage than the other, erroneously named, news channels, covers he latest interviews, etc. where she persist in getting very far out over her skis and displaying her radicalism and unbounded ignorance on nearly every topic into which she leaps. Wonder if she has ever read the constitution or, at least, more that the few percent of the major headings? From listening to her on several occasions I have severe doubts.

So, when Foxnews delivers slanted propaganda against a Democrat, in your eyes that is "balanced news"? Is that what you are trying to say?

 

[Keyser76]

Do you watch any of the other fake news cable channels? She is being interview or having appearances covered that you would think she was some major intellect or successful professional. The 'focus' (as you refer to it) on Fox is to counter the nonsense she gushes forth elsewhere. Fox, in their attempt to be much more balanced in their coverage than the other, erroneously named, news channels, covers he latest interviews, etc. where she persist in getting very far out over her skis and displaying her radicalism and unbounded ignorance on nearly every topic into which she leaps. Wonder if she has ever read the constitution or, at least, more that the few percent of the major headings? From listening to her on several occasions I have severe doubts.

She scares the **** out of the old guard, good on her. And talk about getting out over your skis! Donnie is touching the tips with his nose.

 

[mule_eer]

Do you watch any of the other fake news cable channels? She is being interview or having appearances covered that you would think she was some major intellect or successful professional. The 'focus' (as you refer to it) on Fox is to counter the nonsense she gushes forth elsewhere. Fox, in their attempt to be much more balanced in their coverage than the other, erroneously named, news channels, covers he latest interviews, etc. where she persist in getting very far out over her skis and displaying her radicalism and unbounded ignorance on nearly every topic into which she leaps. Wonder if she has ever read the constitution or, at least, more that the few percent of the major headings? From listening to her on several occasions I have severe doubts.

The major interview I know of is from 60 minutes. I've pointed out my concerns about her from that interview, at least the part I saw, in the past. She's really active on twinstagram. I don't see much coverage about that on major networks, although I will freely admit I don't watch much tv or cable news.

I mentioned Fox because she is the boogeyman for the right, much how Trump is the boogeyman for the left. Fox covers her because she goves them easy points to argue against.

 

[atlkvb]

Do you watch any of the other fake news cable channels? She is being interview or having appearances covered that you would think she was some major intellect or successful professional. The 'focus' (as you refer to it) on Fox is to counter the nonsense she gushes forth elsewhere. Fox, in their attempt to be much more balanced in their coverage than the other, erroneously named, news channels, covers he latest interviews, etc. where she persist in getting very far out over her skis and displaying her radicalism and unbounded ignorance on nearly every topic into which she leaps. Wonder if she has ever read the constitution or, at least, more that the few percent of the major headings? From listening to her on several occasions I have severe doubts.

She has a firm grasp on all three branches of Congress

https://www.dailywire.com/news/38491/watch-ocasio-cortez-has-no-idea-what-3-branches-ryan-saavedra

 

[The Dunedein]

She may not know about the three branches of government, she may be alarmist on the environmental issue, and she just might be completely cuckoo for Cocoa-Puffs.

But the poster in another thread who said she has fat calves seems to be to way off base on that one.

 

[Shirley Knott]

We only have 12 years to win World War II. So will we loose 45 million plus Souls before we spend whatever it takes to control "climate change" or will we put her in charge to solve the problem before 2031? Can she tell us how much it's going to cost at least, and what the plan to control the climate is?

We should put our legislators/politicians in charge of climate repair, we already know how smart and efficient they are..