I've seen a lot of conservatives do the same thing.Would be nice, but SF is like a socialist/communist. Doesnt matter how much it doesnt work, theres always other factors to blame. It just looks too good on paper and sounds too good to change.
I've seen a lot of conservatives do the same thing.Would be nice, but SF is like a socialist/communist. Doesnt matter how much it doesnt work, theres always other factors to blame. It just looks too good on paper and sounds too good to change.
I remember seeing at least one WR screen where Martinez dropped back and lobbed it over the D Linemen’s heads but to a WR who had the OLine in front of him blocking.I beg to differ. I counted about 10-12 swing passes to Mills or Wandale. I recorded the game and saw no screens.
The closest to be screens were:
2nd Q, 2:00 min 3rd5 Mills got 6 yrards with swing pass out in the flat, OL active blocking nothing disguiesed.
3rd Q 11:37 min 3rd 9 swing pass out in the flat to Wandale
3rd Q 5:24 min 2nd 6 broken play, active OL blocking nothing disguised, shuffle pass to Wandale
4th Q 5:26 min 2nd 6 quick swing pass to Wandale out in the flats
4th Q 4:47 min 3 rd 2 swing pass to Mills out in the flats, nothing disguised.
The conversion to Mills in the 4th is was 100% a screen, it a swing pass. Not sure how he doesn’t understand this, they don’t look anything alike.I remember seeing at least one WR screen where Martinez dropped back and lobbed it over the D Linemen’s heads but to a WR who had the OLine in front of him blocking.
What do you call that kind of play if it isn’t a WR screen?
Edit: I agree, passes out in the flat aren’t screen passes. But there were some screen passes that you must have missed.