This tournament just wasn't fun. All 1 seeds, national champ game has same team 3 years in a row, crazy winning streaks by top teams, 30 point natty game. Kinda developing similar dynamics to CFB
UCLA was old with a good mix of transfers. They’ll be replacing the entire team. See if it’s a great 2 year run or it’s sustainable.Last year and this year were the first two NCAA Final Fours for UCLA. Just because they blasted South Carolina doesn't mean they aren't a new face in the women's power teams.
Seniors scored every single point for UCLA in this year's Final Four. Next year's team won't come close to what this year's team accomplished.UCLA was old with a good mix of transfers. They’ll be replacing the entire team. See if it’s a great 2 year run or it’s sustainable.
The final four teams were the same as last year as wellThis tournament just wasn't fun. All 1 seeds, national champ game has same team 3 years in a row, crazy winning streaks by top teams, 30 point natty game. Kinda developing similar dynamics to CFB
I think that's part if it. A lot of it now has to do with identifying best fit for what you need and utilizing financial resources in the most efficient manner. Iowa wasted resources on Emely and Addie last year. There's no other way to look at it. They got good value from CCW. We need more CCW's and fewer Emelys and Addies.All going to come down to which schools are going to put up $$$ for top talent.
It definitely wasn't good, but I also don't think doomsday. It's possible it rattled them, but I think the Virginia game came down to just having a really bad day at home and some decent shots not falling.So that loss to UCLA wasn't some kind of doomsday event after all.
Free throws!It definitely wasn't good, but I also don't think doomsday. It's possible it rattled them, but I think the Virginia game came down to just having a really bad day at home and some decent shots not falling.