Lol, you cant even acknowledge the part I quoted ya cock gargler. Lol. Silly doogie.
See all that nonsense you had to write because you are incapable of a basic task?Which part that you quoted, sparkles? The "but"? The "but" is as meaningless as your micropeen. Either you're factually accurate, or you're not. If you purposely push lies in order to push propaganda, you're a subhuman turd. If you purposely ignore factual corrections, and try to make the person who points out factual corrections look like they're advancing some other position in doing so, you're a subhuman turd. So, yes, it's completely fine ... in fact, it's EXPECTED that someone who has the actual facts, presents these actual facts to the ignorant/liars/propagandists, even if they otherwise don't support something else that happened. If you don't understand this, this helps to explain why you're a low level throwaway travelling auditor, and we're glad you try to avoid your family when at all possible.
See all that nonsense you had to write because you are incapable of a basic task?
You keep talking about facts as if anything I disputed was a fact. I pointed out the usage of "but" in the English language.
Now you sre going to keep responding like the little puppy you are because you cant just admit you were wrong. Thus, I will laugh at you.
Very unsurprising for someone who got caught in a lie about their education. Poor boogie.
Moogy, we have been through this. Im not reading paragraphs of drivel from you. Get to the phucking point in 5 sentences or less or realize you dont know how to say what you mean to phucking say.You suck at trolling. You claimed using "but" made someone a bunch of asterisks. Except all it did was allow him to be factually accurate and correct other's mistakes. You failed at whatever it was you were attempting to do ... at this point, the only possible explanation for your actions is to try to promote lies and misrepresentations by insulting someone with asterisks. You continue to fail. And being factually accurate is still preferred to your micropeen-driven idiocy.
Moogy, we have been through this. Im not reading paragraphs of drivel from you. Get to the phucking point in 5 sentences or less or realize you dont know how to say what you mean to phucking say.
This is lame as fu.ck dude. It doesn't matter that I agreed they have an immigration problem and the violent perpetrators should be harshly punished, the important thing is I said "but" at the beginning of a sentence that mocked the reliability of tweets. You might be as dumb(with a b) as the lower-level trolls in this thread who think that because I made a couple of factual corrections that I'm a Muslim terrorist who advocates setting policemen on fire and burning down all institutions of higher learning.See the "but"
"Im not excusing this BUT"
Thats what makes you a raging piece of ****.

Sound familiar?
Guess we know where dumba$$ Dickpic got his info that “they set him on fire by accident”

Dickpic still fuming that we blamed those poor Somali kids for setting that guy on fire….when it was really just an accident.Here's some advice for you turdley. Shut the ever living fu.ck up. You can't read, you don't understand anything, your posts aren't remotely relvant, no one respects you and you're dumber than a bag of pubic hair. Now back to your corner.
View attachment 1467713
Not a bit mad and you're not the least bit funny so no need for your childish emojis. You're just an under-developed juvenile delinquent trying to fit in, but you don't.Dickpic still fuming that we blamed those poor Somali kids for setting that guy on fire….when it was really just an accident.![]()

Tiger Illustrated Football
Clemson outclassed by No. 4 Miami in 41-13 loss
Tiger Illustrated Football
Clemson runs into too much firepower from No. 4 Miami in 41-13 loss
Tiger Illustrated Football
Clemson - Miami Postgame Notes
Tiger Illustrated Football
Dabo Swinney Postgame News Conference & Player Interviews
Tiger Illustrated Football
Read our subscribers' comments during and after Clemson's loss to Miami