Vandy education....."The other thing about Coach Fitz is he is an alumni"
I think he means "alumnus"
No. They think there were three Pat Fitzgeralds who played for and now coach at NU: PF, PF Junior, and PF the Third."The other thing about Coach Fitz is he is an alumni"
I think he means "alumnus"
It’s a southern thing
I was at the Vandy/Kentucky game a few weeks back during a trip to Nashville. They are a really lousy football team.
Well there was the U.S. attorney for Chicago who prosecuted Scooter Libbey a decade ago.No. They think there were three Pat Fitzgeralds who played for and now coach at NU: PF, PF Junior, and PF the Third.
It’s a southern thing.
And not understanding about weather.Mostly, they're angry about Northwestern's student section attendance.
It means they belong to a club.![]()
I'm afraid it's more widespread than that. When you seen one of these, check if there are two (or more) people in the car ... almost always, There's an alumnus or an alumna in the car, but not two alumni.
![]()
Plus the potholes around the stadium.Mostly, they're angry about Northwestern's student section attendance.
Why is "Vandy always going to have it tough in the SEC", when their equivalent school in the B1G (i.e. NU) is sitting at 6-2 in conference play and has been consistently a decent to good team over the past decade? Isn't that the point of the linked thread, thst they can and should expect to be more than SEC bottom feeders? Stanford is another example of an academically strong school with a strong football team. There's no real reason why Vandy can't have more success on the football field.Vandy is always going to have it tough in the SEC, but who would have thought they'd be playing a Tennessee team that is 0-7 in the SEC at this stage of the season.
I don’t want to say the SEC is “bad” but I am starting to wonder. Missouri got owned by Purdue, and now Mizzou, admittedly a different team, has throttled Florida, UT, and Vandy in recent weeks, and they were pretty even with Kentucky.Why is "Vandy always going to have it tough in the SEC", when their equivalent school in the B1G (i.e. NU) is sitting at 6-2 in conference play and has been consistently a decent to good team over the past decade? Isn't that the point of the linked thread, thst they can and should expect to be more than SEC bottom feeders? Stanford is another example of an academically strong school with a strong football team. There's no real reason why Vandy can't have more success on the football field.
I agree. I went to the A&M - South Carolina game earlier this season, and neither team looked special. LSU's starting QB is a transfer from Purdue. A team like Vandy should be able to expect to set a baseline of 3-4 conference wins every year. If NU can do it, so can Vandy.I don’t want to say the SEC is “bad” but I am starting to wonder. Missouri got owned by Purdue, and now Mizzou, admittedly a different team, has throttled Florida, UT, and Vandy in recent weeks, and they were pretty even with Kentucky.
Sagarin puts MSU at 14 (that will drop) and LSU at 20, then there’s a big gap to aTm at 35. Missouri checks in at 45–one ahead of Indiana.
So after Georgia, Auburn, and Bama, you have to wonder what’s left.
The SEC is weak. The SEC East is going on 3-4 years of awful. The SEC West has just caught up.So after Georgia, Auburn, and Bama, you have to wonder what’s left.
Why is "Vandy always going to have it tough in the SEC", when their equivalent school in the B1G (i.e. NU) is sitting at 6-2 in conference play and has been consistently a decent to good team over the past decade? Isn't that the point of the linked thread, thst they can and should expect to be more than SEC bottom feeders? Stanford is another example of an academically strong school with a strong football team. There's no real reason why Vandy can't have more success on the football field.
I don’t want to say the SEC is “bad” but I am starting to wonder. Missouri got owned by Purdue, and now Mizzou, admittedly a different team, has throttled Florida, UT, and Vandy in recent weeks, and they were pretty even with Kentucky.
Sagarin puts MSU at 14 (that will drop) and LSU at 20, then there’s a big gap to aTm at 35. Missouri checks in at 45–one ahead of Indiana.
So after Georgia, Auburn, and Bama, you have to wonder what’s left.
Kansas and Baylor are pretty bad this year. Illinois and Rutgers would beat them respectively.The SEC does appear to be weaker than usual. To me, the Big 12 looks like the best-balanced conference this season, even though their top teams don't appear to be better than the top teams of the other conference.
Kansas and Baylor are pretty bad this year. Illinois and Rutgers would beat them respectively.
Kentucky has been a disappointment this year. There's two games they should have flat out won and found a way to lose. In a way I'm glad, as now they're unlikely to play and NU in a bowl game as my loyalties would be divided.How did Kentucky look???