Van Dyke

RUChoppin

Heisman
Dec 1, 2006
19,270
13,695
0
Accordin to @bac2therac mulcahy deserved the T. When asked to explain what paul did to deserve the T bac never responded. Figures

I saw the Iowa player bump into paul and mouth off in his face. In return I saw paul puts his hands up and keep his mouth shut. Paul didn’t even make eye contact with the kid !!!!

In what possible universe are paul’s actions there worthy of a T. I still await bacs explanation

My guess is that when Omoruyi bumped into the back of Mulcahy, the ref thought that was Mulcahy intentionally hitting his body into the Iowa player. Three blind mice plays in the background.

I can't say the ref was right or wrong, or that Van Dyke was right or wrong, until I know what was said. Neither Van Dyke nor Boroski have a benefit of the doubt from me - and if anything, Boroski has less credibility.
 

ru66

All-American
Jul 28, 2001
12,175
6,257
0
Accordin to @bac2therac mulcahy deserved the T. When asked to explain what paul did to deserve the T bac never responded. Figures

I saw the Iowa player bump into paul and mouth off in his face. In return I saw paul puts his hands up and keep his mouth shut. Paul didn’t even make eye contact with the kid !!!!

In what possible universe are paul’s actions there worthy of a T. I still await bacs explanation
Anyone who listens to a guy that blows with the wind (wins or losses) and thinks he's right more often than wrong is easily swayed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Loyal-Son

fluoxetine

Heisman
Nov 11, 2012
23,529
16,898
0
 

RU_03

Senior
Aug 28, 2010
413
411
63
Van Dyke yelled "********!!!" for the first T.

The second one I have no idea, but Cliff was fouled on the alley-oop and it wasn't called. Pike was actually more in the ref's ear than him, but he gave it to Van Dyke.
 

RUChoppin

Heisman
Dec 1, 2006
19,270
13,695
0
Van Dyke yelled "********!!!" for the first T.

The second one I have no idea, but Cliff was fouled on the alley-oop and it wasn't called. Pike was actually more in the ref's ear than him, but he gave it to Van Dyke.

If that's all he said, then it's a nonsense T. If he directed it specifically at the ref, like "That's ********, Bo!" or "That's ********, and you know it!" or something, that'd rise to a higher level.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HPNJRUfan

ColonelRutgers

All-American
Dec 15, 2003
7,095
9,247
113
It’s unacceptable for Van Dyke to get a technical and he should’ve been embarrassed and mortified that he got the first one. If that were me and I had hurt the team I would’ve sat there like a church mouse the rest of the game. To put yourself in position to be seen or heard again is outrageous. There is absolutely no excusing it whatsoever.
 

bac2therac

Hall of Famer
Jul 30, 2001
247,314
176,995
113
Accordin to @bac2therac mulcahy deserved the T.

When asked to explain what paul did to deserve the T bac never responded. Figures

I saw the Iowa player bump into paul and mouth off in his face. In return I saw paul puts his hands up and keep his mouth shut. Paul didn’t even make eye contact with the kid !!!!

In what possible universe are paul’s actions there worthy of a T. I still await bacs explanation


I dont need to ******* explain because none of us know exactly what had been going on all game long. I applaud the refs for doing the double T thing to get control...the first time Caleb could have been the only one to get the t too but they called it on both. I love guys in front of television set thinking they know everything going on in real time on the court
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Leonard23
A

anon_0k9zlfz6lz9oy

Guest
I dont need to ****ing explain because none of us know exactly what had been going on all game long. I applaud the refs for doing the double T thing to get control...the first time Caleb could have been the only one to get the t too but they called it on both. I love guys in front of television set thinking they know everything going on in real time on the court
Mccaffrey literally walked at caleb, caleb wasnt moving. mccaffrey is a punk *****
 

Mr. Magoo1

Heisman
Nov 15, 2001
15,449
16,281
113
It’s unacceptable for Van Dyke to get a technical and he should’ve been embarrassed and mortified that he got the first one. If that were me and I had hurt the team I would’ve sat there like a church mouse the rest of the game. To put yourself in position to ne seek or heard again is outrageously unacceptable.
That’s what amazed me. Thinking I could potentially have cost RU a game and a tournament bid, I wouldn’t dare say another word. He’s obviously not the sharpest tool in the shed. He should be fired just for being that stupid.
 

bac2therac

Hall of Famer
Jul 30, 2001
247,314
176,995
113
It’s unacceptable for Van Dyke to get a technical and he should’ve been embarrassed and mortified that he got the first one. If that were me and I had hurt the team I would’ve sat there like a church mouse the rest of the game. To put yourself in position to be seen or heard again is outrageous.


this...that anyone cannot see this really shows how people have lost any objectivity. Van Dyke embarrassed Rutgers period and cost RU points, that should never happen
 

bac2therac

Hall of Famer
Jul 30, 2001
247,314
176,995
113
Caleb said something because McCaffrey and Paul had some sort of words or contact. Caleb didn’t move but was basically sticking up for Paul.


there is always going to be jawing. I have no trouble with refs trying to keep control and apparently there was alot of jawing. So Paul got called for a T and people are ballistic but at the same time their guy was tossed. We have no idea what the refs had been warning the players as this game was going on. Truthfully they did a poor job because that they had to keep calling Ts in this game showed they didnt get their message across to either team
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUChoppin

RUChoppin

Heisman
Dec 1, 2006
19,270
13,695
0
I dont need to ****ing explain because none of us know exactly what had been going on all game long. I applaud the refs for doing the double T thing to get control...

I think the refs really interpreted Mulcahy's body movement as being technical-worthy, even though they were a result of Omoruyi banging him from behind. But you only get to review cylinder calls, not whether you botched a technical because you saw something that wasn't there.

Pretty clear on the super-slo-mo replays that Mulcahy did nothing in that instance. If you think it's something to be applauded because of actions that occurred prior in the game, I don't know what to tell you.
 

Scangg

Heisman
Mar 19, 2016
25,448
49,369
113
The only one embarrassing themselves out there was Bo and the reffing crew

People have been dying for the coaches to get on the refs. I like it. Would have preferred it be Knight or Hobbs though but at least someone on the staff had enough
 

Scarlet83

Heisman
Feb 4, 2004
9,541
10,700
103
this...that anyone cannot see this really shows how people have lost any objectivity. Van Dyke embarrassed Rutgers period and cost RU points, that should never happen
It is unacceptable for Van Duke to cost the team anything during a game. Absolutely unacceptable.

It is also unacceptable for the ******** officiating in this game. To me, the officials took the game away from Rutgers. The officiating was horribly one-sided.

To me, both are true.
 

RedTeamUpstream94

All-American
Jan 15, 2021
3,376
6,312
113
I dont need to ****ing explain because none of us know exactly what had been going on all game long. I applaud the refs for doing the double T thing to get control...the first time Caleb could have been the only one to get the t too but they called it on both. I love guys in front of television set thinking they know everything going on in real time on the court

total cop out non-answer

exaxtly what I expected from you

you can’t call a T based on “what had been going on all game” wtf are you talking about?!?!

in THAT MOMENT paul did nothing. Actual he did the opposite - he kept his mouth shut, put is hands up, and didn’t even look at the guy.

a ref can’t T up paul in THAT MOMENT if he was mouthy 5 minutes before that?!?? Wtf are you talking about.

You are so ingrained in your defend-a-ref schtick that you can’t even acknowledge an obvious situation where a refs call is inexplicable so you come up with some ridiculous non-answer.

you made a definitive statement. “Paul deserved the t”. You said that.

other than “he must have done somehting earlier” you’ve given nothing to support your statement

expected nothing else
 
Last edited:

Pancho1939_rivals

All-Conference
Jun 26, 2012
1,887
2,907
113
What i don’t get is why didn’t the ref go to pikiell first and say coach if your S&C coach says another word he is getting T’d up. Then let pikiell tell him to shut the F up.

Refs are so dumb. Apparently no one is allowed to make mistakes or get emotional except the refs. They can do what they want.

I don’t think it is embarrassing for pikiell. Everyone knows he is a good guy and he apologized for their behavior
 

Pancho1939_rivals

All-Conference
Jun 26, 2012
1,887
2,907
113
BAC I agree 90% of the time but refs are a game changer.

If a referee is using Ts to control a game than they have done an extremely poor job up to that point. I have never seen a good officiating crew lose control of a game.

On top of that Ting up bench personnel without going to head coach first is amateur hour and really shows that the refs were to emotional and losing control of themselves
 

bac2therac

Hall of Famer
Jul 30, 2001
247,314
176,995
113
total cop out non-answer

exaxtly what I expected from you

you can’t call a T based on “what had been going on all game” wtf are you talking about?!?!

in THAT MOMENT paul did nothing. Actual he did the opposite - he kept his mouth shut, put is hands up, and didn’t even look at the guy.

a ref can’t T up paul in THAT MOMENT if he was mouthy 5 minutes before that?!?? Wtf are you talking about.

You are so ingrained in your defend-a-ref schtick that you can’t even acknowledge an obvious situation where a refs call is inexplicable so you come up with some ridiculous non-answer.

you made a definitive statement. “Paul deserved the t”. You said that.

other than “he must have done somehting earlier” you’ve given nothing to support your statement

expected nothing else



and what do you have except a hard on for refs
 
  • Like
Reactions: Loyal-Son

bac2therac

Hall of Famer
Jul 30, 2001
247,314
176,995
113
apparently the St Louis player was calling the cheerleaders whores and C words and they responded by flipping him off and then got tossed
 

bac2therac

Hall of Famer
Jul 30, 2001
247,314
176,995
113
Just answer the question

be a man

you said “paul deserved the T”

in that moment what exactly did paul do to “deserve a T”

I’ll wait for a real answer and not another cop out or misdirection

yeah the ref just calls a t for no reason..you have zero credibility

stop pouting, imagine going on and on about refs in a game that ru got their asses kicked because you cant get over ts being called.
 

bac2therac

Hall of Famer
Jul 30, 2001
247,314
176,995
113
and what do you have..nothing....did you see his lips before and after I dont know...were you on the court, you have no idea what happened. refs dont call ts for no reason
 

rob kight

All-American
Oct 22, 2020
4,916
6,245
113
Van Dyke yelled "********!!!" for the first T.

The second one I have no idea, but Cliff was fouled on the alley-oop and it wasn't called. Pike was actually more in the ref's ear than him, but he gave it to Van Dyke.
I think refs can overlook comments from a head coach easier than from an underling.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bac2therac

fluoxetine

Heisman
Nov 11, 2012
23,529
16,898
0
apparently the St Louis player was calling the cheerleaders whores and C words and they responded by flipping him off and then got tossed
Lol wtf
@bac2therac there is no reason to call a T on a coach/player on bench for being verbal. None. Head coach for coming in court and yelling at ref? Sure. Todays t’s to van dyke are suspension worthy for the refs. No one came to watch them
100% this, a player should have to say something extremely bad to get T’d up, these sportsmanship Ts are ******* stupid.
 

rob kight

All-American
Oct 22, 2020
4,916
6,245
113
1. Missed foul shots
2. Technical fouls
3. Ref bias
4. Missed chippies
5. Some poor substitutions and poor timing— turn a nice lead into being behind
6. Poor adaption to Iowa zone
7. Poor 3 shooting
8. Zero from bench (actually less than zero with Hyatt impact.
9. I’m sure there are more
Just change a few of these and we win the game. Take your choice!
 

JoeDell27

Junior
May 11, 2009
215
369
53
I dont need to ****ing explain because none of us know exactly what had been going on all game long. I applaud the refs for doing the double T thing to get control...the first time Caleb could have been the only one to get the t too but they called it on both. I love guys in front of television set thinking they know everything going on in real time on the court
Isn't that exactly what you are doing. Lol. Again, love a lot of your posts and the bactology but you literally have no middle ground. It's quite odd.
 

rob kight

All-American
Oct 22, 2020
4,916
6,245
113
Lol wtf

100% this, a player should have to say something extremely bad to get T’d up, these sportsmanship Ts are ****ing stupid.
Calling a T for someone on the bench saying BS to a no call is really stretching it unless you are out to get that team. In the excitement of the game people are going to react to plays. Watch almost any game and you will see the entire bench standup and express disagreement with a call. Refs should expect that to happen and not affect the flow of the game because they are overly sensitive a-holes or just looking for an excuse to help a particular team.