Tweak 3.0

jimisize1

All-Conference
May 5, 2008
1,929
1,549
66
Play Diallo. If he's THAT good, play him. If he is intelligent then he has picked up most things by now.
 

KWilt43atbuzz

All-American
Nov 18, 2012
17,050
6,848
0
Let's just throw team chemistry that's taken 6 months to get us on a roll and throw it out the Fin window.

:chairshot::chairshot::chairshot::chairshot::chairshot::chairshot::chairshot::chairshot::chairshot::chairshot::chairshot::chairshot::chairshot::chairshot::chairshot::chairshot::chairshot::eyes::chairshot::chairshot::chairshot::chairshot::chairshot::chairshot::chairshot::(
 

UK_Is_Good

Senior
Dec 7, 2005
11,735
685
0
 

kybassfan

Heisman
Jul 1, 2005
20,032
16,368
113
We never discussed this before.

[poop][poop][poop][poop][poop][poop][poop][poop][poop][poop][poop][poop][poop]
 

ib4ky_rivals111873

All-Conference
Dec 18, 2005
1,321
2,300
0
ALL Hypothetically speaking for discussion only:thumbsdown:[thumb2]:thumbsdown:[thumb2]:thumbsdown:[thumb2]:

Would RR play Diallo in NCAA tourney game IF there were circumstances (injury, foul out, ejection, etc.) happened to THREE of the five guards (Fox, Monk, Briscoe)?

Or would RR in this above scenario live and die with Hawkins and Mulder in an ELITE-8 game against UNC, UL or KU? All have decent guards.

What about same scenario in a FINAL game against NOVA, PUKE or ARZ? All have decent guards.

Where do you draw the line? Don't play Diallo at all and rely on Brad if needed or only play him as a last resort in a critical game?