Turn the Michigan game on now!!!

Grant Green

All-American
Jan 21, 2004
3,956
5,482
113
Shouldn’t Mecheatagain forfeit the game because the extra point was never attempted? If I remember correctly when Penn Stste beat Iowa on the last play, the ball had to be snapped for an extra point attempt.
No, the extra point doesn't have to be kicked on a walk off TD.
 

trufan

All-Conference
Nov 16, 2025
354
1,123
93
Refs were just practicing so they will be ready when we play McCheatin.
I'm gonna guess that will be the crew that does our game.
 

JoePaMajorCFBrecord409Ws

All-Conference
Jun 26, 2025
1,003
1,036
113
Moral of the story: Don’t get yourself into a close game with um.

I love how the b1g scumbags dig in their pouch and generate an angle that super-subjectively claims to show a WMU player touch the ball with 1000th of a second left (there is no way you can definitively know when the ball is touched as it is extremely impacted by camera angle) - remember, the call on the field was 0:00; that's weak-sauce bs to claim this is "definitive proof" the clock did not expie... BUT somehow claimed the "Call Stands" due to lack of definitive evidence in the Michael Penix JR and the PSU TD taken away against Nebraska when both Videos clearly and definitively demonstrated that the wrong call was made - but according to the bs b1g, the videos were too subjective to call and the calls on the field stood. This league is full of so much parochial homerism, bs and scumbaggery, it isn't even funny.
 
May 17, 2011
277
718
93
I don't agree with it but the MAC has already said the call was correct
They want those Big Ten game checks
Anyone can sue who experienced damages. The individual players have been winning all the court battles. They can sue both the B1G and the MAC.
 

Monty2007

Sophomore
Apr 10, 2007
128
181
43
So listening to SXm College Sports this morning, the explanation they got was the officials clock has tenths of a second so there was 0.001 second left. If true, this is wrong on so many levels. Not fair to the fans and especially the players on the field. It might have been Fozzy Whitaker that said is this the same as extra time in soccer.
 

SleepyLion

All-Conference
Sep 1, 2022
2,878
4,435
113
So listening to SXm College Sports this morning, the explanation they got was the officials clock has tenths of a second so there was 0.001 second left. If true, this is wrong on so many levels. Not fair to the fans and especially the players on the field. It might have been Fozzy Whitaker that said is this the same as extra time in soccer.
I don't buy this at all. When the clock is at 15:00 to start the quarter it takes a full second (not 0.999 seconds) to get to 14:49.

Also, when they added time earlier in the game, they could have added fractions of seconds, but they do not.
 

94LionsFan

Senior
Sep 27, 2023
227
427
63
That info is off base.

The league tweeted a statement accompanied by a video. Neither the statement nor the video references fractions of a second.

As noted in the statement, the “officials’ clock” was the scoreboard clock (the same one the broadcast showed during replays). They had no other clock.

But somehow the broadcast showed the ball touched at 0:00 while the league’s video showed it touched at 0:01.



Big Ten tweet
 

Attachments

  • IMG_9484.jpeg
    IMG_9484.jpeg
    571.9 KB · Views: 3

JoePaMajorCFBrecord409Ws

All-Conference
Jun 26, 2025
1,003
1,036
113
So listening to SXm College Sports this morning, the explanation they got was the officials clock has tenths of a second so there was 0.001 second left. If true, this is wrong on so many levels. Not fair to the fans and especially the players on the field. It might have been Fozzy Whitaker that said is this the same as extra time in soccer.

The video provided is the worst possible angle you could use for this play - it is behind the play and the WVU player who they claimed touched it with time remaining. It is clearly not a definitive angle for several reasons. First of all, a single camera cannot provide accurate "3D depth" such that it will make the ball appear closer to the WMU player because it is shot from directly behind the WMU player. The reverse angle which is what was shown on the broadcast synched with the gameclock clearly shows that the WMU player jumped AND had his arms fully extended before he ever touches the ball. The b1g angle provide makes it appear that the ball is coming into the WMU player's body as it disappears over his shoulder - this is a clear optical illusion generated by the inherent flatness of a single camera shot from behind the player. The reverse angle which was shown on the broadcast clearly shows the actual flight of the ball and how far away from the WMU player it was when he reached for ir (again, the WMU player is both jumping and has his arms fully extended before he ever touches the ball. The b1g inconclusive video provided makes it appear that the ball is coming into the WMU player's body as it disappears over his shoulder (an optical illusion resulting from the camera angle directly behind and slightly abve the WMU player in question).

Secondly, you clearly are unable to see the ball when the WMU player actually touches it from this camera angle - the ball disappears over the WMU player's shoulder before he touches it.
 
BWI

Latest

  1. 01 BWI Football Without Max Granville, Penn State believes its pass rush can keep growing
  2. 02 BWI Recruiting Five-star D-line target set to return to Penn State
  3. 03 BWI Recruiting Four-star DE Michel Adams emerging as a name to know ahead of Penn State visit
  4. 04 BWI Football Penn State Notebook: Campbell on playing time, Zay Robinson and Buffalo
  5. 05 BWI Football Penn State has a simple goal for Saturday's clash with Buffalo, but it's one that isn't always easy to reach