Tuesday games

kcg88

Heisman
Aug 11, 2017
10,862
17,230
0
Peeps are sleepin on Sparty..not only nationwide but on this board.
Slid under the radar with Malik Hall out. And AJ Hoggard is a great PG even though he can't shoot. Different styles but he's in that Zavier Simpson mold where he can't make 3s but is otherwise nails.
 

bac2therac

Hall of Famer
Jul 30, 2001
247,593
177,316
113
Iowa State blew out Texas Tech by 34...looks like the Red Raiders are not going to be in the running for a bid this year

Vandy up on Tennessee by 2 at half

Ole Miss up on Auburn by 1 at half

Illinois up 11 at Nebby at half

UNC up at UVA by 2 at half

Kansas up 2 on Okie at half
 

kcg88

Heisman
Aug 11, 2017
10,862
17,230
0
Big 12 might only get 6 in. Oklahoma State, West Virginia, Texas Tech, and Oklahoma are 0-for against the top 6 in that league. Texas Tech especially stinks.

OU is down 6 at Kansas right now. Worth monitoring.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MiloTalon13

Rutgers25

All-American
Jul 29, 2001
7,757
6,172
83
Fred Hoiberg is a terrible coach. His teams always look like an undisciplined mess.
 

bac2therac

Hall of Famer
Jul 30, 2001
247,593
177,316
113
Was Okie up 10 at Kansas?. A total meltdown in the last 4 minutes. The kind of win the Sooners needed
 

bac2therac

Hall of Famer
Jul 30, 2001
247,593
177,316
113
Kyle Neptune is a joke of a coach. His players took laughable shots only down 5 or 6

De Paul beats Nova for first time in 15 years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MiloTalon13

Scarlet Shack

Heisman
Feb 3, 2004
26,271
15,938
73
Temple won and is now 10-8. Be interesting to see if they can actually string some momentum together . They should be good enough to have a winning record , but they are so up and down ….
 

goru7

All-American
Dec 12, 2005
6,425
7,689
113
Temple sucks but they are winning 72-63 late
You keep on stating your opinion and really come back to reality. They are 10-8 and 4-1 in second place in their league , are 3-2 on the road with another neutral court win over us. Sucks is normally reserved for 250-363 level teams. Temple is like a 125-150 team. They are not a good team but they do not suck. Teams that are 4-13 suck. You love crucifying Rutgers when they lose to teams that you say suck. You said Wake Forest sucked and was not good either. Your words no longer mean anything.
 

Colbert17!

Heisman
Aug 30, 2014
17,383
18,822
113
I mentioned this before. The BE in 10 years will be as relevant as the Horizon League.
 

bac2therac

Hall of Famer
Jul 30, 2001
247,593
177,316
113
You keep on stating your opinion and really come back to reality. They are 10-8 and 4-1 in second place in their league , are 3-2 on the road with another neutral court win over us. Sucks is normally reserved for 250-363 level teams. Temple is like a 125-150 team. They are not a good team but they do not suck. Teams that are 4-13 suck. You love crucifying Rutgers when they lose to teams that you say suck. You said Wake Forest sucked and was not good either. Your words no longer mean anything.
you are entitled to your opinion
 

RUChoppin

Heisman
Dec 1, 2006
19,270
13,695
0
You keep on stating your opinion and really come back to reality. They are 10-8 and 4-1 in second place in their league , are 3-2 on the road with another neutral court win over us. Sucks is normally reserved for 250-363 level teams. Temple is like a 125-150 team. They are not a good team but they do not suck. Teams that are 4-13 suck. You love crucifying Rutgers when they lose to teams that you say suck. You said Wake Forest sucked and was not good either. Your words no longer mean anything.
They'll be better if they can get Reynolds back off of surgery in a couple weeks
 

G- RUnit

All-American
Sep 13, 2004
14,372
7,975
113
They'll be better if they can get Reynolds back off of surgery in a couple weeks
Temple really isn’t that bad. We had two starters out at a neutral site game. I’m over that game. More upset at SHU and Iowa.
 

goru7

All-American
Dec 12, 2005
6,425
7,689
113
They hung on...stunning
They'll be better if they can get Reynolds back off of surgery in a couple weeks
Another really good point. They have been playing without their center who ate us up for 5-6 games as well. With him they have a semblance of a low post game to go along with their 2 shooting guards. If their guards hit shots and hit 3’s they can give teams a game. If guards shoot like crap they can be blown out against a good team.
 

goru7

All-American
Dec 12, 2005
6,425
7,689
113
This - or alternatively, the “no chance whatsoever for an at large bid” curve.
How about Wake Forest? Do they suck too? Your defending of BAC is comical. Try using the English language correctly . So any team outside the top 100 sucks. So. Davidson is 160 in the NET and played Purdue to a 69-60 game sucks. I don’t think even BAC was saying teams outside Top 100 suck. You know what sucks , you injecting your stupid dumb opinion about teams that aren’t part of the Power 6 and act like you know anything about them. You probably didn’t know Temple has played without their center the last 5-6 games. Your post is a total fail.
 

fluoxetine

Heisman
Nov 11, 2012
23,529
16,898
0
How about Wake Forest? Do they suck too?
Well Wake Forest is inside the top 100. Mediocre is probably a more appropriate descriptor.
Your defending of BAC is comical. Try using the English language correctly . So any team outside the top 100 sucks.
Yes.
So. Davidson is 160 in the NET and played Purdue to a 69-60 game sucks.
Yes.
I don’t think even BAC was saying teams outside Top 100 suck. You know what sucks , you injecting your stupid dumb opinion about teams that aren’t part of the Power 6 and act like you know anything about them. You probably didn’t know Temple has played without their center the last 5-6 games. Your post is a total fail.
I know they are bad by power 6 or NCAA tournament standards which is the only relevant measure around here. If we beat some D2 school I am also going to tell you they "suck" even if they are good by D2 standards. No one cares about that.

Why a couple posters are so defensive about teams from weak conferences is baffling to me.
 

goru7

All-American
Dec 12, 2005
6,425
7,689
113
Well Wake Forest is inside the top 100. Mediocre is probably a more appropriate descriptor.

Yes.

Yes.

I know they are bad by power 6 or NCAA tournament standards which is the only relevant measure around here. If we beat some D2 school I am also going to tell you they "suck" even if they are good by D2 standards. No one cares about that.

Why a couple posters are so defensive about teams from weak conferences is baffling to me.
Because you are relatively new around here. BAC has a tendency to never forgive Rutgers for losing to certain teams , Temple , St. Bonnie’s , Pittsburgh , etc. He then proceeds to call them trash or they suck even though some of those teams end up on the bubble at the end of the year or guess what , upset a higher rated team again later in the season. But there are circumstances and these are college kids and sometimes have bad games. Injuries are good excuses for other teams but never for Rutgers. So your opinion and explaination still sucks.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: bac2therac