Toggle sidebar

Trump Witch Hunt

TigerGrowls

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
48,177
37,260
113


Free speech has been indicted. Read this section of the indictment. It acknowledges that Trump has the right to say, even falsely, the results were fraudulent and claim he won the election. That’s protected by the First Amendment. But the indictment says he can’t lie about election fraud. So they must prove Trump didn’t believe his speech. And then, I would think, they’d need to indict every politician who lies (need to build more jails) about election results (Clinton, Kerry, Abrams). The DOJ has criminalized politics. And because, who is to decide the truth, criminalized free speech.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OleFastball
firegiver

firegiver

Heisman
Sep 10, 2007
74,113
21,207
113
TigerGrowls said:


Free speech has been indicted. Read this section of the indictment. It acknowledges that Trump has the right to say, even falsely, the results were fraudulent and claim he won the election. That’s protected by the First Amendment. But the indictment says he can’t lie about election fraud. So they must prove Trump didn’t believe his speech. And then, I would think, they’d need to indict every politician who lies (need to build more jails) about election results (Clinton, Kerry, Abrams). The DOJ has criminalized politics. And because, who is to decide the truth, criminalized free speech.
Click to expand...

Brother, they tried to replace the electerates with their own people who wold vote against the will of your fellow Americans. He is a traitor and hes going down.
Do you seriously not understand that?
 
  • Like
Reactions: nytigerfan, WapPride, fcctiger12 and 3 others
TigerGrowls

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
48,177
37,260
113
firegiver said:
Brother, they tried to replace the electerates with their own people who wold vote against the will of your fellow Americans. He is a traitor and hes going down.
Do you seriously not understand that?
Click to expand...
This is not correct. They did plan to go up there and have the swing states sent back to the state legislatures to investigate the irregularities that occurred but that never happened due to the false flag event concocted by the establishment to ensure no real debate occurred and to demonize maga republicans from that day forward.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: coldbud1994, OleFastball, yoshi121374 and 1 other person
D

dannyford

All-American
Aug 6, 2010
5,299
6,720
50
  • Like
Reactions: OleFastball
O

OleFastball

All-Conference
Jun 8, 2021
1,905
2,831
0
firegiver said:
Brother, they tried to replace the electerates with their own people who wold vote against the will of your fellow Americans. He is a traitor and hes going down.
Do you seriously not understand that?
Click to expand...
They attempted a coup on him and no one is going down. Do you not understand that? They subverted the will of the people using the power of the government itself. Do you not understand that?
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: yoshi121374 and TigerGrowls
O

OleFastball

All-Conference
Jun 8, 2021
1,905
2,831
0
All of this is stupid anyway. It is speech protected by the first amendment and will go the supreme court where it will be overturned anyway. That is if Trump doesn't win. If he wins he will pardon himself. And if you come at the king, you best not miss.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls
yoshi121374

yoshi121374

Heisman
Jan 26, 2006
13,194
22,932
113
OleFastball said:
All of this is stupid anyway. It is speech protected by the first amendment and will go the supreme court where it will be overturned anyway. That is if Trump doesn't win. If he wins he will pardon himself. And if you come at the king, you best not miss.
Click to expand...

It is not protected when you know it's false. When you continue to spread lies that you use to attempt to subvert the will of the voters that's illegal. Also interesting how none of you debate that he knew it was a lie. You apparently are fine with that.

It never ceases to amaze me that you guys truly don't understand what "Freedom of Speech" means.
 
dpic73

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
34,083
30,391
113
  • Like
Reactions: WapPride and yoshi121374
dpic73

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
34,083
30,391
113
TigerGrowls said:
Alleen Cannon is an esteemed and impartial judge end of sentence.
Click to expand...
The 11th Circuit disagrees

"The 11th Circuit also emphasized that granting the special master review of the seized documents represented a “dramatic and unwarranted” overreach by the lower court’s authority, and that allowing the ruling to stand would upend the legal system:

The law is clear. We cannot write a rule that allows any subject of a search warrant to block government investigations after the execution of the warrant. Nor can we write a rule that allows only former presidents to do so. Either approach would be a radical reordering of our case law limiting the federal courts’ involvement in criminal investigations. And both would violate bedrock separation-of-powers limitations.
Click to expand...
The opinion went further still in its smackdown of Cannon’s decision, noting that “the district court stepped in with its own reasoning” more than once, providing legal arguments in support of Trump’s lawsuit that the former president’s lawyers had not made themselves."

 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374 and clemsontiger02
clemsontiger02

clemsontiger02

Heisman
Oct 5, 2004
11,183
45,235
113
dpic73 said:
The 11th Circuit disagrees

"The 11th Circuit also emphasized that granting the special master review of the seized documents represented a “dramatic and unwarranted” overreach by the lower court’s authority, and that allowing the ruling to stand would upend the legal system:


The opinion went further still in its smackdown of Cannon’s decision, noting that “the district court stepped in with its own reasoning” more than once, providing legal arguments in support of Trump’s lawsuit that the former president’s lawyers had not made themselves."

Click to expand...

That 11 circuit court (compromised of two Trump appointees, and one by George W) is obviously deep state.
 
  • Like
Reactions: flotiger, yoshi121374, dpic73 and 1 other person
TigerGrowls

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
48,177
37,260
113
dpic73 said:
The 11th Circuit disagrees

"The 11th Circuit also emphasized that granting the special master review of the seized documents represented a “dramatic and unwarranted” overreach by the lower court’s authority, and that allowing the ruling to stand would upend the legal system:


The opinion went further still in its smackdown of Cannon’s decision, noting that “the district court stepped in with its own reasoning” more than once, providing legal arguments in support of Trump’s lawsuit that the former president’s lawyers had not made themselves."

Click to expand...
Did anything happen to her? The answer is no so this is just the judicial lib militia attacking a real judge who doesnt use their anti american tactics.
 
dpic73

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
34,083
30,391
113
TigerGrowls said:
Did anything happen to her? The answer is no so this is just the judicial lib militia attacking a real judge who doesnt use their anti american tactics.
Click to expand...
Sounds like you agree that since nothing has happened to the J6 judge, you're using MAGA militia attacks against a fair and impartial judge.
 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374
TigerGrowls

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
48,177
37,260
113
dpic73 said:
Sounds like you agree that since nothing has happened to the J6 judge, you're using MAGA militia attacks against a fair and impartial judge.
Click to expand...
Nope because I am right and you are wrong. Cannon is honest and the Obama judge is not. Its that simple.
 
TigerGrowls

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
48,177
37,260
113
dpic73 said:
How is the J6 judge not honest? Have any of her rulings been rebuked by a circuit court?
Click to expand...
By her deplorable behaviour toward J6 defendents on multiple occasions alone. She also has a conflict of interest due to working with Hunter and Trump being his political opponent.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: yoshi121374
dpic73

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
34,083
30,391
113
TigerGrowls said:
By her deplorable behaviour toward J6 defendents on multiple occasions alone. She also has a conflict of interest due to working with Hunter and Trump being his political opponent.
Click to expand...
Oh got it! You're mad at her for correctly ruling against traitors to our country.
 
  • Like
Reactions: flotiger
TigerGrowls

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
48,177
37,260
113
dpic73 said:
What does Hunter Biden have to do with Jan 6th?

Just because your side is wholly corrupt doesn't mean the other side is. Most judges are able to fairly adjudicate cases regardless of who they've known in the past.
Click to expand...
This is not the J6 thread.
 
TigerGrowls

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
48,177
37,260
113

 
yoshi121374

yoshi121374

Heisman
Jan 26, 2006
13,194
22,932
113
dpic73 said:
Then don't pull Hunter Biden into it. He's not some ubiquitous Rasputin with mystic tentacles wrapped around every judicial ruling you oppose.
Click to expand...

He is whatever they need him to be for the current narrative. At some points he's a bumbling coked out moron, other times, genius pulling strings around the world.
 
  • Like
Reactions: okclem, flotiger and dpic73
You must log in or register to reply here.
Tiger Illustrated

Latest

  1. 01 Tiger Illustrated Where every Clemson Football newcomer stands heading into game week
  2. 02 On3 Power Four at crossroads over NFL returnees as SEC president warns of 'mockery,' Big Ten approves ban
  3. 03 Tiger Illustrated TI TRENDING: Our latest at defensive tackle
  4. 04 Tiger Illustrated What we were just told about Clemson's quarterback battle
  5. 05 Tiger Illustrated What we are hearing on Gideon Davidson and Chris Johnson
Top Bottom