Toughness

RUHouston

All-American
Jul 24, 2009
5,180
5,134
58
No I wouldn’t have.

I brought this up because I don’t think right now we are that deep and Pike doesn’t right now fully trust his bench. The OP said we are and are built to make a long run in the tourney.

I hope we are good enough and bank some wins so Pike has the luxury to allocate minutes like Painter did. If we get to the point where we are comfortably in the NCAAs I would hope Pike would be willing to roll the dice and let Simpson give Caleb and Paul 5 minutes each of rest in the 2nd half.

In my mind with the win we are back to the bubble or slightly above it. If we can get to 3 or 4 games over .500 in B1G I’d think the focus is more on the end game of advancing in the NCAAs and start to really look to limit minutes of starters and really develop the bench.

Right now it is get wins at all costs and get back to NCAAs
Maybe with the back end of our regular season schedule he’lll be able to lighten the load on said starters… if Minny is that bad….
 
  • Like
Reactions: Greene Rice FIG

ru66

All-American
Jul 28, 2001
12,175
6,257
0
All these accolades from guys that typically turn on a dime after a loss. I just hope the usual pre ejaculations hold off but blowing with the wind is a staple of bs experts. Let's hope a royal jinx is avoided.
 

rudad02

All-American
Nov 7, 2010
8,853
5,773
0
It is all about toughness. Izzo has preached it for decades and he is the second best Big Ten coach in history. That is what this Rutgers team is all about. Plus 2 veteran 6-7 guards. This team is but more for March than any Rutgers team since 1976 and no one wants to see Rutgers in their bracket. Rutgers is very similar to Houston but deeper. It will be the most fun March imaginable.And throw your money on a second round Purdue loss. The antithesis of tough.
Toughness is a great intangible. So is experience. This club has both.
 

snowboarder

All-Conference
Aug 3, 2004
1,001
1,094
113
I agree totally with the fatigue issue.
The average person has no idea how demanding high level athletics can be .
These kids have to be at their best every day
I played 3 high school sports but never at a level close to this and I got tired at times
My son started 4 years in midfield for Rutgers Soccer
Believe me, dead legs can creep up on any athlete
Once you get them, all you can do is rest
The key is to get the proper rest throughout the season
Rest in between games can more then make up for the extra 5 minutes each game
The staff has to be aware of this with the way we play
Pike is a smart man , I'm sure he is on top of this
 

ScarletDave

Heisman
Oct 7, 2010
34,596
15,349
85
I agree with this 100%. While the bench plays Pike and staff don’t have the confidence to rely on them.

This is where the scheduling piece came up in the Willard thread - the BIG schedule is unrelenting with 3 time zones and lots of short rest. Rutgers doesn’t yet have the depth to play at the intensity level they need without seeing some drop off.

Best case they grind now to put wins in their pocket so they don’t need a long BIG tournament run to get in. I think there is something to be said about the mid and low major tournaments, ending a week before the tournament starts. They gifted with more time to recover.

And… Don’t forget these guys are supposed to also go to school and do homework.
Rutgers doesn’t have the depth?? We have one of the deepest benches in the Big Ten what are you talking about .. 8 guys play regular minutes and could start and then Reiber is the 9th guy plays like the 7th guy on a lot of teams
 
  • Like
Reactions: ChasRC69

njxchange

All-Conference
Aug 27, 2007
1,029
1,177
0
Rutgers doesn’t have the depth?? We have one of the deepest benches in the Big Ten what are you talking about .. 8 guys play regular minutes and could start and then Reiber is the 9th guy plays like the 7th guy on a lot of teams
I would have agreed before the season started but Reiber has been a let down so far. Maybe it's because he's not getting his playing time this year but I was really hoping Reiber would contribute big this year. Wolfman coming along really nice probably is bigger reason why he is not getting his minutes but in any case, when Reiber got his minutes, he hasnt shown anything.
Miller was coming along nicely until everyone got healthy again.
At least Miller is really good on defense.

I think if we get into any kind of foul trouble or people getting tired, Reiber and Miller is still good enough to go from 4mins a game to 10mins a game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MiloTalon13

RUInsanityToo

All-American
May 5, 2006
9,516
9,826
113
What agenda do I have?

Not sure if its an agenda but you seem to have continual hedging tactics in attempts to bring expectations back to the middle.

Now that the "who will take the last shot?" theme has cooled for the moment, next up is minutes distribution using last year with 40% different major contributors as a barometer.

The team plays approximately 2 games a week and there are 7 major contributors this season compared to 5 last season. Since the roster appears to be deeper this year - and your comment that we are only a bubble team at this point - what you really appear to be saying that you don't think this team is good enough to make a sustained impact in the BIG or tourney. I'm not sure how your suggestion for expanding the significant minutes rotation to 8 or 9 by awarding extra minutes to 2 lesser performs will make the team better in the short or long term. It would be more likely for Pike to manage potential fatigue through practice (i.e. infrequent days off or film room).

While the nature of sports sometimes means things can change on a dime.....my own feeling is that right now this team has the ability to beat any team in college basketball. While that will likely not happen, I have not had this type of feeling for any other RU Basketball squad in my time as a fan.
 

PSAL_Hoops

Heisman
Feb 18, 2008
13,150
12,474
78
So far our minutes aren’t bad because of the blowouts. I am keeping our eyes on the minutes (especially 2nd half) on all these toss up games we will be playing over the next 3 weeks.

Don’t want Paul and Caleb playing 37 and Cliff 33

Last year was different. The bench was thin because it was a huge drop off in every facet when a starter went to the bench. There’s only one reason remaining this season that at times forces Pike to play Paul and Caleb big minutes - that’s to navigate on ball perimeter pressure. Remember - both of them missed a lot of early season games so to this point, he’s probably wanted to get them as many reps as possible playing together before BIG play kicked into gear.

Turnovers are the biggest things holding us back - particularly the type that lead to run outs the other way. We prevented these Monday and that’s a big reason we won. No turnovers at all from Paul. Caleb had 3 but one was on the last inbounds play and another was an offensive foul (a side out). Those guys did a really good job of protecting the ball.
 

Nycrusupporter

All-American
Jun 8, 2021
4,998
7,551
73
The median team is giving up 1.1 points per possession in the NBA. Ru hasn’t had a game we’re opponent was above 1.1
That’s because every team has elite scorers who hit buckets at a high percentage even when the opponent plays perfect defense. Defense is insanely tough in the NBA, but when players have range out to 30 feet or can dribble through several players to get to the rim, you have a lot more scoring.
 

Roy_Faulker

All-Conference
Feb 7, 2002
4,867
2,617
0
Looking at box scores - outside of the blowouts and games when Paul and Caleb were out we have 8 guys who consistently see time and 4 of them are guards. When we go Cam, Caleb, and Paul to start the only other person playing (except for maybe 2-mins per game for Miller) is Simpson. Those are long shifts to have 2 of the 3 always on the court. Need Miller to develop to allow 2 of the starters to break when needed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MiloTalon13

njxchange

All-Conference
Aug 27, 2007
1,029
1,177
0
Only reason why Pike is playing starters 30+ mins is because of these stupid rankings based on point differential.

These dumb rankings based on point differential will make us being ranked #7-#10 in the bracket or being a bubble team with the same record.
 

njxchange

All-Conference
Aug 27, 2007
1,029
1,177
0
I agree totally with the fatigue issue.
The average person has no idea how demanding high level athletics can be .
These kids have to be at their best every day
I played 3 high school sports but never at a level close to this and I got tired at times
My son started 4 years in midfield for Rutgers Soccer
Believe me, dead legs can creep up on any athlete
Once you get them, all you can do is rest
The key is to get the proper rest throughout the season
Rest in between games can more then make up for the extra 5 minutes each game
The staff has to be aware of this with the way we play
Pike is a smart man , I'm sure he is on top of this
eh....

in my teens and my 20s.
i also played high school sports and college FB.
after games, on saturdays, i would be outside shooting hoops all day, running full court.
it was non stop playing ball basketball, tennis, football, baseball. But I never thought Im so tired because I played game few days ago...... I still went out at night to bars/nightclubs and dance till the morning and be fine next day...

Stamina & Energy at that early age is crazy...
 

cm_13

All-American
Aug 28, 2018
2,641
5,551
73
2nd half
Paul played 18:10
Caleb played 18:50

If this team was truly deep those 2 players aren’t on the court that much. The intensity is not sustainable over the next 2 months. Pike has to use the bench.

Getting 2 more wins would go a long way to feeling more comfortable using the bench as a loss wouldn’t be catastrophic,

Look at Purdues minutes. Painter is playing the long game.
I haven’t looked at how many minutes they’re typically playing in the second half, but I think a big part of the reason for the extended minutes in this game was because of the foul trouble.

Mag and Spencer both picked up their 3rd just over 3 minutes into the second half. Hyatt also picked up his 3rd about 7 minutes into the second half.
 

MiloTalon13

All-American
Jun 3, 2022
3,979
5,608
0
eh....

in my teens and my 20s.
i also played high school sports and college FB.
after games, on saturdays, i would be outside shooting hoops all day, running full court.
it was non stop playing ball basketball, tennis, football, baseball. But I never thought Im so tired because I played game few days ago...... I still went out at night to bars/nightclubs and dance till the morning and be fine next day...

Stamina & Energy at that early age is crazy...
Totally agree, keeping team chemistry and everyone mentally on board and engaged is more challenging than the physical fatigue part.
 
Feb 5, 2003
10,968
9,370
113
I just compared last year's Rutgers starting five minutes per game in conference play to UNC's. There's almost no difference. UNC's starters averaged 30-34 minutes, ours were 29+ to 34.9 minutes. They had three bench guys average 10-12 minutes, we had four in the 7.7 - 12+ range. That does not include Jones, who averaged 7.7 but clearly fell out of the rotation. Somehow that did not stop UNC from having enough left in the tank to reach the finals.

I think we'll be okay.
 

Greene Rice FIG

Heisman
Dec 30, 2005
40,437
23,613
0
Not sure if its an agenda but you seem to have continual hedging tactics in attempts to bring expectations back to the middle.

Now that the "who will take the last shot?" theme has cooled for the moment, next up is minutes distribution using last year with 40% different major contributors as a barometer.

The team plays approximately 2 games a week and there are 7 major contributors this season compared to 5 last season. Since the roster appears to be deeper this year - and your comment that we are only a bubble team at this point - what you really appear to be saying that you don't think this team is good enough to make a sustained impact in the BIG or tourney. I'm not sure how your suggestion for expanding the significant minutes rotation to 8 or 9 by awarding extra minutes to 2 lesser performs will make the team better in the short or long term. It would be more likely for Pike to manage potential fatigue through practice (i.e. infrequent days off or film room).

While the nature of sports sometimes means things can change on a dime.....my own feeling is that right now this team has the ability to beat any team in college basketball. While that will likely not happen, I have not had this type of feeling for any other RU Basketball squad in my time as a fan.
I'll agree with sentence 1.

Sentence 2 is still an issue in my mind, but I am very happy with what I saw with both Paul AND Cam.

Sentence 3. As of RIGHT NOW we are a bubble team. Now it is silly to do analysis on Jan 4, but our current resume (not our future resume) has a win vs WF, Indiana and Purdue but loses to SH, Temple, OSU and Miami. We are 3-4 vs. teams with a pulse.

Sentence 3. I said right now we are a bubble team based on current results. My confidence is growing that we will get the wins necessary to get comfortable in to the tournament

Sentence 3. Adding minutes to Simpson can come directly from Paul and Caleb. Now saying that I am also have been the most critical of Simpson compared to most posters. He has potential, but he is making way too many mistakes. I am sure If i were in pike's shoes I'd probably give Simpson less minutes then he is getting. Very easy to say what Pike should do from the comfort of my house or seat at the RAC.

Sentence 4. I think i share your feeling. Our defense has been off the charts, super elite. Quite frankly I didn't see that coming. I knew we would be good defensively, but not this!
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Eagleton96

Greene Rice FIG

Heisman
Dec 30, 2005
40,437
23,613
0
Last year was different. The bench was thin because it was a huge drop off in every facet when a starter went to the bench. There’s only one reason remaining this season that at times forces Pike to play Paul and Caleb big minutes - that’s to navigate on ball perimeter pressure. Remember - both of them missed a lot of early season games so to this point, he’s probably wanted to get them as many reps as possible playing together before BIG play kicked into gear.

Turnovers are the biggest things holding us back - particularly the type that lead to run outs the other way. We prevented these Monday and that’s a big reason we won. No turnovers at all from Paul. Caleb had 3 but one was on the last inbounds play and another was an offensive foul (a side out). Those guys did a really good job of protecting the ball.
The comparison of benches between '22 and '23 is very fluid. Mag was on the bench last year and had a tough time playing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MiloTalon13

Greene Rice FIG

Heisman
Dec 30, 2005
40,437
23,613
0
That’s because every team has elite scorers who hit buckets at a high percentage even when the opponent plays perfect defense. Defense is insanely tough in the NBA, but when players have range out to 30 feet or can dribble through several players to get to the rim, you have a lot more scoring.
I am furious at myself for even bringing up the NBA. I will not respond to this. I'd be happy to talk about the Devils power play or how good Connor McDavid is.
 

Greene Rice FIG

Heisman
Dec 30, 2005
40,437
23,613
0
Only reason why Pike is playing starters 30+ mins is because of these stupid rankings based on point differential.

These dumb rankings based on point differential will make us being ranked #7-#10 in the bracket or being a bubble team with the same record.
I do think this is a factor.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MiloTalon13

Greene Rice FIG

Heisman
Dec 30, 2005
40,437
23,613
0
eh....

in my teens and my 20s.
i also played high school sports and college FB.
after games, on saturdays, i would be outside shooting hoops all day, running full court.
it was non stop playing ball basketball, tennis, football, baseball. But I never thought Im so tired because I played game few days ago...... I still went out at night to bars/nightclubs and dance till the morning and be fine next day...

Stamina & Energy at that early age is crazy...
So........

1. Do you disagree with my assessment that we had nothing in the tank at the end of last year
2. If you are a Rangers fan did they not beat Tampa Bay and get to the Stanly Cup because they had nothing left in the tank?
3. Was Paul not a different person after his crazy 4 1/2 game stratech where he put the team on his back? The constant complaining to the refs and actually twice tripping to trip opponents had nothing to do with physical and mental fatigue?
 

Greene Rice FIG

Heisman
Dec 30, 2005
40,437
23,613
0
I just compared last year's Rutgers starting five minutes per game in conference play to UNC's. There's almost no difference. UNC's starters averaged 30-34 minutes, ours were 29+ to 34.9 minutes. They had three bench guys average 10-12 minutes, we had four in the 7.7 - 12+ range. That does not include Jones, who averaged 7.7 but clearly fell out of the rotation. Somehow that did not stop UNC from having enough left in the tank to reach the finals.

I think we'll be okay.
You can NOT compare what a UNC player is required to do in his 34 minutes to what a Rutgers player is required to do in his 34 minutes.

I say this all the time......go watch a clip of Oregon last year on defense and watch Jacob Young. At Rutgers you do not go under screens. If you do you will be on the bench. At Oregon you just need to score. You do not need to fight through screens on the high side.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RU-ROCS

bac2therac

Hall of Famer
Jul 30, 2001
247,302
176,989
113
So........

1. Do you disagree with my assessment that we had nothing in the tank at the end of last year
2. If you are a Rangers fan did they not beat Tampa Bay and get to the Stanly Cup because they had nothing left in the tank?
3. Was Paul not a different person after his crazy 4 1/2 game stratech where he put the team on his back? The constant complaining to the refs and actually twice tripping to trip opponents had nothing to do with physical and mental fatigue?


i tend to agree...at the end of the season we were no match at Purdue and we were atrocious on defense vs Iowa and our D was pretty bad vs Notre Dame including when it counted

the way RU wins isnt the way most teams win, they do it with offensive prowess. RU's way involves a lot of discipline both mental and physical. We will have games where we do not produce on one or both ends. RU is stiill threading the needle with its win, Margin of error is still small in close games
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rutgers25

Greene Rice FIG

Heisman
Dec 30, 2005
40,437
23,613
0
i tend to agree...at the end of the season we were no match at Purdue and we were atrocious on defense vs Iowa and our D was pretty bad vs Notre Dame including when it counted
Normally I am furious when we play without effort on D. After watching that game i wasnt angry or mad at all. It just seemed to me it was obvious they were on empty. A 1/2 step slow.

We expended so much physical and mental energy to go from dead to in the tournament.

I think too many fans don't really appreciate how hard we play and the fact that there are only a handful of teams in college basketball that play as hard as we do.
 

njxchange

All-Conference
Aug 27, 2007
1,029
1,177
0
So........

1. Do you disagree with my assessment that we had nothing in the tank at the end of last year
2. If you are a Rangers fan did they not beat Tampa Bay and get to the Stanly Cup because they had nothing left in the tank?
3. Was Paul not a different person after his crazy 4 1/2 game stratech where he put the team on his back? The constant complaining to the refs and actually twice tripping to trip opponents had nothing to do with physical and mental fatigue?

1. I dont agree. I dont think we lost at the end (notre dame)because we had nothing in the tank. I think we lost that game because we are still new to this level of playing. (Chicago Bulls could not beat Detroit pistons, not because they had nothing in the tank but because it was new to them. They needed to experience and learn from it before making that next step towards being a champion)
I do believe this is the reason why we lose bunch of games at the end because we are still not accustomed to being a consistent winning team. Even as fan, at end of the games, we are thinking, "oh ****, how are we going to lose this game? this time..."

2. Sorry but NCAA and Pro Sports is different. They play different amount of games. Guys are alot older. Stamina 100% comes into a play more than NCAA

3. Paul was amazing on those games but when stretch of he could do nothing wrong came to end, he tried to just force everything instead of letting the game come to him. It was because he was tired... This was new found moment, where he got to taste his true ability of being able to really take over.
- I truly feel this time after Purdue game, we are going to see that Paul again going forward. but this time, he is more mature and will be able to let the game come to him instead of forcing even when things dont go his way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Loyal-Son

Arizona Knight

All-American
Jun 25, 2001
16,675
9,931
56
So........

1. Do you disagree with my assessment that we had nothing in the tank at the end of last year
2. If you are a Rangers fan did they not beat Tampa Bay and get to the Stanly Cup because they had nothing left in the tank?
3. Was Paul not a different person after his crazy 4 1/2 game stratech where he put the team on his back? The constant complaining to the refs and actually twice tripping to trip opponents had nothing to do with physical and mental fatigue?


That 5th game after the streak was at Purdue. Paul had 15 points despite Purdue deciding to put Jayden Ivey on him if I recall. I’m sure Paul’s frustration (if we want to call it that) was more about all of a sudden becoming the focus of the other team’s defense than any fatigue. It’s like expecting a No 3 receiver to not have a drop in production if he all of a sudden is matched up against the opponents best DB.
 
  • Like
Reactions: njxchange

njxchange

All-Conference
Aug 27, 2007
1,029
1,177
0
Just want to add that - we are at the stage where we are a good team. We just need to jump this hurdle (mentally) and we become a great team going forward. Thats when at end of the games, we dont make stupid mistakes or dont get flustered as we do sometimes...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Loyal-Son

Greene Rice FIG

Heisman
Dec 30, 2005
40,437
23,613
0
Just want to add that - we are at the stage where we are a good team. We just need to jump this hurdle (mentally) and we become a great team going forward. Thats when at end of the games, we dont make stupid mistakes or dont get flustered as we do sometimes...
I really don't know what to think. We are so atypical where we win because of defense. We are a bad offensive team and quite frankly our ceiling isn't very high, in my opinion.

Right now We have demonstrated on the court and on paper we can beat any team on any court. I hope this can continue through March
 

RU-ROCS

All-American
Feb 5, 2003
12,408
7,573
113
You can NOT compare what a UNC player is required to do in his 34 minutes to what a Rutgers player is required to do in his 34 minutes.

I say this all the time......go watch a clip of Oregon last year on defense and watch Jacob Young. At Rutgers you do not go under screens. If you do you will be on the bench. At Oregon you just need to score. You do not need to fight through screens on the high side.

Good point. Minutes are not the same for teams that play maximum pressure D.
 

Nycrusupporter

All-American
Jun 8, 2021
4,998
7,551
73
1. I dont agree. I dont think we lost at the end (notre dame)because we had nothing in the tank. I think we lost that game because we are still new to this level of playing. (Chicago Bulls could not beat Detroit pistons, not because they had nothing in the tank but because it was new to them. They needed to experience and learn from it before making that next step towards being a champion)
I do believe this is the reason why we lose bunch of games at the end because we are still not accustomed to being a consistent winning team. Even as fan, at end of the games, we are thinking, "oh ****, how are we going to lose this game? this time..."

2. Sorry but NCAA and Pro Sports is different. They play different amount of games. Guys are alot older. Stamina 100% comes into a play more than NCAA

3. Paul was amazing on those games but when stretch of he could do nothing wrong came to end, he tried to just force everything instead of letting the game come to him. It was because he was tired... This was new found moment, where he got to taste his true ability of being able to really take over.
- I truly feel this time after Purdue game, we are going to see that Paul again going forward. but this time, he is more mature and will be able to let the game come to him instead of forcing even when things dont go his way.
The biggest cause for exhaustion at the end of the season is conference tournaments, where you could conceivably play games for as many as 4 straight days, which I have honestly always thought was a weird thing to do before the NCAA Tourament, bacause it is easy to see how a team can come out of that exhausted when they aren’t trained to play like that. However we only played one game in the conference tournament and had 5 days off before that loss and 5 days before the game with ND. We were not tired, we were outcoached. ND had us chasing the ball along the perimeter which opened up lanes to cut to the basket and scored layup after layup. We never adjusted our defense to what they were doing, that is why we lost.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scangg and Degaz-RU

RUInsanityToo

All-American
May 5, 2006
9,516
9,826
113
I'll agree with sentence 1.

Sentence 2 is still an issue in my mind, but I am very happy with what I saw with both Paul AND Cam.

Sentence 3. As of RIGHT NOW we are a bubble team. Now it is silly to do analysis on Jan 4, but our current resume (not our future resume) has a win vs WF, Indiana and Purdue but loses to SH, Temple, OSU and Miami. We are 3-4 vs. teams with a pulse.

Sentence 3. I said right now we are a bubble team based on current results. My confidence is growing that we will get the wins necessary to get comfortable in to the tournament

Sentence 3. Adding minutes to Simpson can come directly from Paul and Caleb. Now saying that I am also have been the most critical of Simpson compared to most posters. He has potential, but he is making way too many mistakes. I am sure If i were in pike's shoes I'd probably give Simpson less minutes then he is getting. Very easy to say what Pike should do from the comfort of my house or seat at the RAC.

Sentence 4. I think i share your feeling. Our defense has been off the charts, super elite. Quite frankly I didn't see that coming. I knew we would be good defensively, but not this!

Well reasoned.

The only thing I can really disagree on is that we are a bubble team (right now based on current / not future resume). As flawed as the current rankings might be on Jan 4, if the season had to end today Rutgers would be safely in the Tourney. Miami and OSU have more than a pulse - they are Q1 games on the road. OSU also might even have considerations of circumstance especially with the admission of officiating mistake by the BIG. SHU was a bad loss - but a rivalry game. Temple was a bad loss - had injuries of circumstance. Even without any extenuating circumstance, RU's NET and other rankings are pretty high. RU would factor somewhere between a 7-10 seed IMO, which is not on the bubble.
 

PSAL_Hoops

Heisman
Feb 18, 2008
13,150
12,474
78
The comparison of benches between '22 and '23 is very fluid. Mag was on the bench last year and had a tough time playing.

No - it’s really not. What your saying doesn’t make sense. Mag and Hyatt didn’t play much last year because they were both liabilities subbing in at every position other than the 4 (Mag a liability on offense / Hyatt on defense) and the 4 position was taken by a guy who made an NBA roster. I love Ron but I do believe we’re a better defensive team without him this season. Hyatt and Mag have complemented each other quite well thus far at the 4 and neither are playing burn out minutes.

We’re in better shape at the 5 too as we still have Dean and Wolf is way better than Agee was.

Finally, at guard - 2 guys averaging 20+ minutes (Cam and Simpson) replaced one guy (Geo) in addition to us having the first guard reserve off the bench from last year back (Miller).

How is that not more depth?
 

PSAL_Hoops

Heisman
Feb 18, 2008
13,150
12,474
78
Put another way Green - Hyatt and Mag don’t play together all that often now that Caleb and Paul are back. To this point though, we have been successful in collectively replacing Ron’s production via the use of 2 guys instead of one. This year we have 4 guards averaging 7.5+ ppg in 21+ minute. Last year- the 4th guard in our rotation didn’t score and only averaged 7.7 mpg (I’m not counting Jaden as he was DNP the last 10 or so games of the season).
 
  • Like
Reactions: njxchange