Three years old but this is the type of list you need to look at.
Not sure what point you are making. It's a list of 30 coaches that someone thought were rising stars a few years ago. The next coach could come from that list....or maybe not.So a three year old article did the job that some head-hunting firm is being paid big $$ to do now! Seems reasonable!![]()
Why would stringers contract duration have to do with the new hire…she already said she’s “done”My guess is the new coach will be named the first week of June if the reports that Stringer’s contract doesn’t end until then.
I believe t since she already announced her retirement, and settled the financial terms of retiring (a little over$800,000payout instead of the around $2.2 million owed if she stayed the full term or had to be bought out .So there's no problem hiring replacement now , even if it's September her retirement becomes official when she receives the $872,988 agreed uponMy guess is the new coach will be named the first week of June if the reports that Stringer’s contract doesn’t end until then.
Well let’s see Monday is May 23 2022… leaves 8 days to seal a new deal for a HC . Hope it’s a good one.I believe t since she already announced her retirement, and settled the financial terms of retiring (a little over$800,000payout instead of the around $2.2 million owed if she stayed the full term or had to be bought out .So there's no problem hiring replacement now , even if it's September her retirement becomes official when she receives the $872,988 agreed upon
The money being paid probably is why September is the official date, and not sooner ..
If paid sooner the date of payment would be the official date she retired.
No reason to suspect no one will be hired before June,except finding a quality candidate might be hard to do with most tied up and checking backgrounds for those interested needs to be done carefully so no surprises pop up.
Might take longer than 8 days.Well let’s see Monday is May 23 2022… leaves 8 days to seal a new deal for a HC . Hope it’s a good one.
Take heart, you might not have seen her retirement papers, but it’s been reported CVS has announced she’s officially retired.And as for why June first ? No particular reason . We haven’t had a coach in over a year now so who cares what date. Typical mindset of some can’t guess. BTW : have not seen Stringers signed and dated resignation papers and I sincerely doubt only a few have.
no bubble, just wondered why you think a date needs to be set for hiring Stringer's replacement implying her contract is up June 15th , even though that doesn't matter since she officially retired April 30thAre you serious? All I did was give an opinion …an arbitrary date in time and as is normal some love to make it out to be more than what it is. Did you actually live in a bubble growing up? Can someone conjecture a date without the DHS getting involved . Use your brain folks …
It doesn’t matter what you or I think. I said a date of June 1 st. You act like a child on something which is arbitrary to the entire situation.no bubble, just wondered why you think a date needs to be set for hiring Stringer's replacement implying her contract is up June 15th , even though that doesn't matter since she officially retired April 30th
What you did was made it Shakespearean (,Much Ado About Nothing)
with your peanut gallery statement , then arbitrarily giving a date the replacement should be hired by.
No need to become upset when you're questioned about the meaning of what you posted.
Inquiring minds what to know and see if it's something that can be agreed with or the latest conspiracy theory, over the hiring process, to be ignored.
Ok , think what you will.It doesn’t matter what you or I think. I said a date of June 1 st. You act like a child on something which is arbitrary to the entire situation.
That’s the point it isn’t important at this stage but Vivian Stringer could have or her counsel could have approached Hobbs. She was never going to lose $$$$ or benefits.Ok , think what you will.
Not a big deal to me.
Benefits I agree she probably wouldn't give up, especially health benefits for her and daughter.That’s the point it isn’t important at this stage but Vivian Stringer could have or her counsel could have approached Hobbs. She was never going to lose $$$$ or benefits.
I stated my opinion Stringer wasn't ready to retire and her health was a problem, so took LOA to try and improve health enough to come back.Conjecture and Excuses ? Here’s the real world picture .It’s May 23, 2022. RU WBB has not had a HC in over 1 year and unless one is named soon we can definitely write off next season. The insurance was not the problem as RU either way was on the hook. What I said was Stringer and her legal counsel could have worked it out with RU ,Hobb’s and probably NJ power brokers.and still Rutgers is going to place her name on the RAC flooring. How kewl is that.?
The Knight Report
Rutgers Football HC Greg Schiano's Maryland Postgame Press Conference
The Knight Report
Join The Knight Report TODAY and get it for 60% off!
The Knight Report
Rutgers Football holds on for victory over Maryland
The Knight Report
Rutgers Football Injury Report: Latest Updates ahead of the Maryland game
The Knight Report
Rutgers Men's Soccer stuns No. 2 Indiana in historic 1-0 upset