TJ Walker...great tweet!!

kyjeff1

Heisman
Sep 8, 2012
51,201
71,971
113
Oh...ok. If Cal stinks so bad why couldn't coach K make a final 4 with 3 of the highest rated rosters in college basketball history?

Many of you guys did not like Cal before this year. So pile it on. If you like UK basketball for real then you see the ignorance of wanting Cal gone.
Just goes to show that one and done is a stupid thing to do if winning titles is your goal.

Coach K couldn’t do it and he's 5 times the game coach Cal is.

But I'll give Cal credit, he used to manage egos better than anyone else, but even that has faded the last several years.

Still doesn't take away from the actual topic, which is Cal having had far more talent than all other UK coaches combined, and doing less with it.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: KyFaninNC

gracetoyou

Heisman
Apr 19, 2009
19,929
28,842
113
Hall
1 runner up
1 title
1 nit title
3 final fours
Cal
1 runner up
1 title
1 nit appearance
4 final fours

this guy is seriously trying to downplay Joe Hall when Cal is a modern day reincarnation of Hall.

Really? One more final 4 in fewer seasons.
 

gracetoyou

Heisman
Apr 19, 2009
19,929
28,842
113

Blueworld_3.0

Heisman
Sep 23, 2008
14,127
11,256
113
As a former resident of Clifton Heights, I’d probably find it to be quite the strange reference. For one, it’s not a predominately black area, so that’d be weird. Secondly, Clifton Heights sounds cool where Possum Trot doesn’t. Third, ask Cliftoners if they’re offended by having a dirty Kroger.
My point being that the author...your Mr. Walker...chose "Possum Trot". Where there is most likely no blacks, hispanics or asians, because he knew the population is most likely all white. Ergo, small rural community = all white = uneducated hillbilly.
He could have chosen a community like Clifton Heights (25% black population BTW) and referenced a guy named Jerome. But, doing so would run the risk of being seen as associating a minority with a lack of education. And that is strictly off-limits. Whereas, condescending or demeaning language toward rural Kentuckians is seen as perfectly acceptable. It's called a double-standard.
 

KyFaninNC

Heisman
Mar 14, 2005
195,719
24,518
0
I appreciate the business advice, I will certainly keep it in mind. I'm never going to be able to please everyone and if folks don't want to listen to my show because I mentioned Possum Trot in a tweet I'm also OK with that.
I never knew you had a show. I have no idea who you are or want to be, but you took the wrong turn at the fork in the road, up in the holler. Now, make fun of me. You screwed up, eat it and move on. And take your elite attitude with you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cawood86_rivals

Anon1712931820

All-Conference
Apr 11, 2008
9,060
2,141
55
“other schools” aren’t kentucky.
Is 23-23 VS ap top 25 opponents acceptable to you?
is one win against a power 5 conference team in the tourney acceptable to you?
is no final four in 7 years ok with you?
The facts are in your face. You choose the way you want to accept them.
My God...Kentucky is only KENTUCKY again because of Calipari. We were a dumpster fire and couldn't attract any top level coaches to save our lives after Tubby and Gillispie. Since the tournament expanded to 64 teams in 1985 Kentucky has made the Final Four 8 times and Calipari is responsible for four of those! 4 Final Fours in the 25 years prior to Cal is an average of 1 every 6.25 years. Cal has made 4 Final Fours in 10 years, so that's an average of 1 every 2.5 years. Shut up and quit overreacting you bunch of babies.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: RunninRichie

RunninRichie

Heisman
Sep 5, 2019
28,905
69,484
113
My God...Kentucky is only KENTUCKY again because of Calipari. We were a dumpster fire and couldn't attract any top level coaches to save our lives after Tubby and Gillispie. Since the tournament expanded to 64 teams in 1985 Kentucky has made the Final Four 8 times and Calipari is responsible for four of those! 4 Final Fours in the 25 years prior to Cal is an average of 1 every 6.25 years. Cal has made 4 Final Fours in 10 years, so that's an average of 1 every 2.5 years. Shut up and quit overreacting you bunch of babies.
you’re right. Cal was responsible for building UK, never mind 5 stars Deandre Liggins and Patrick Patterson. Once our lord and savior leaves we should just shut the program down and bulldoze rupp down.
#AllHailCal
 
Last edited:

RunninRichie

Heisman
Sep 5, 2019
28,905
69,484
113
My God...Kentucky is only KENTUCKY again because of Calipari. We were a dumpster fire and couldn't attract any top level coaches to save our lives after Tubby and Gillispie. Since the tournament expanded to 64 teams in 1985 Kentucky has made the Final Four 8 times and Calipari is responsible for four of those! 4 Final Fours in the 25 years prior to Cal is an average of 1 every 6.25 years. Cal has made 4 Final Fours in 10 years, so that's an average of 1 every 2.5 years. Shut up and quit overreacting you bunch of babies.
cool stats that mean 0. Cal hasn’t made one since april 2015. He’s no longer getting the elite of the elite anymore.
 

gracetoyou

Heisman
Apr 19, 2009
19,929
28,842
113
My God...Kentucky is only KENTUCKY again because of Calipari. We were a dumpster fire and couldn't attract any top level coaches to save our lives after Tubby and Gillispie. Since the tournament expanded to 64 teams in 1985 Kentucky has made the Final Four 8 times and Calipari is responsible for four of those! 4 Final Fours in the 25 years prior to Cal is an average of 1 every 6.25 years. Cal has made 4 Final Fours in 10 years, so that's an average of 1 every 2.5 years. Shut up and quit overreacting you bunch of babies.

It's impossible to reason with some but you're correct.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Anon1712931820

KyFaninNC

Heisman
Mar 14, 2005
195,719
24,518
0
No, I'm a redneck myself. I thought it was a great tweet because our fanbase can be delusional.
Well don’t you think that is exactly why this fan base is the envy of all other schools? None of them have near the number of crazy fans we have. It’s what separates us from all others.
 

Anon1712931820

All-Conference
Apr 11, 2008
9,060
2,141
55
cool stats that mean 0. Cal hasn’t made one since april 2015. He’s no longer getting the elite of the elite anymore.
But he does have 2 Elite Eights in that span which means we were right there. Its not like weve missed the tournament and been first weekend knockouts every year...the "this is Kentucky" comment doesn't work anymore and hasn't worked since 1998. This isn't your illusion of Rupp and Kentucky being the only player on this side of the Mississippi back in the 1940's and 1950's lol. Five seasons without a Final Four when we've only had 8 in 35 years and 4 in 25 years prior to Cal...again just sit back and let the realistic fans chat.

Rupp made 1 final four in his last 15 years coaching.
Joe B made 3 final fours in his entire coaching career at UK
Pitino left when he was King of Kentucky
Tubby is Tubby
Gillispie is still eating peanut butter crackers

You have no clue what you're talking about.
 

RunninRichie

Heisman
Sep 5, 2019
28,905
69,484
113
But he does have 2 Elite Eights in that span which means we were right there. Its not like weve missed the tournament and been first weekend knockouts every year...the "this is Kentucky" comment doesn't work anymore and hasn't worked since 1998. This isn't your illusion of Rupp and Kentucky being the only player on this side of the Mississippi back in the 1940's and 1950's lol. Five seasons without a Final Four when we've only had 8 in 35 years and 4 in 25 years prior to Cal...again just sit back and let the realistic fans chat.

Rupp made 1 final four in his last 15 years coaching.
Joe B made 3 final fours in his entire coaching career at UK
Pitino left when he was King of Kentucky
Tubby is Tubby
Gillispie is still eating peanut butter crackers

You have no clue what you're talking about.
AGAIN, nobody is arguing or expecting a repeat of that run from 09-15. The point im trying to illustrate Cal has dropped off since 15’
23-23 vs ap top 25 programs (was 41-14 in 2015)
Last 6 years are identical to tubbys last
1-4 against P5 teams in the NCAA tourney (the lone win being against UCLA in 2017)
worst season in kentucky basketball history
Lets just come clean, no matter how many stats I throw at you or how ever many facts you’ll ignore them. To cal fans he built the program, some of you guys would have fit in well with the IU fans still defending knight in the late 90s.



2010-15
190-38 for 83.3%
#1 seeds: 3
NCAAT: 21-4 for 84%
Elite 8: 5
Final 4: 4
Title games: 2
Titles: 1
Vs AP Top 25: 41-14 for 74.5%
vs Top Rivals: 38-11 for 77.6%

2016-21:
149-59 for 71%
#1 seeds: 0
NCAAT: 9-4 for 69.2%
Elite 8: 2
Final 4: 0
Vs AP top 25: 23-23 for 50%
vs Top Rivals: 23-25

73% winning to 83% before 2016
23-23 Vs AP ranked teams to 41-14 before 2016
Losing records versus top rivals, KU, Tennessee, UCLA, etc
1-4 versus Power 5 programs in the NCAAT since 2016

Resume A (5 seasons)
131-40 record
2 Elite Eights
2 Outright SEC Titles
9-5 NCAA Tournament Record
2 SEC Tournament Titles

Resume B (5 seasons)
149-59 record
2 Elite Eights
2 Outright SEC Titles (3 Overall)
9-4 NCAA Tournament Record
2 SEC Tournament Titles

Resume A: Tubby Smith’s Last 5 Years at Kentucky
Resume B: John Calipari’s Last 5 Years at Kentucky


You have no clue what you’re talking about.
 

bkingUK

Heisman
Sep 23, 2007
18,693
22,496
0
My point being that the author...your Mr. Walker...chose "Possum Trot". Where there is most likely no blacks, hispanics or asians, because he knew the population is most likely all white. Ergo, small rural community = all white = uneducated hillbilly.
He could have chosen a community like Clifton Heights (25% black population BTW) and referenced a guy named Jerome. But, doing so would run the risk of being seen as associating a minority with a lack of education. And that is strictly off-limits. Whereas, condescending or demeaning language toward rural Kentuckians is seen as perfectly acceptable. It's called a double-standard.
The guy mentioned nothing about race you weirdo. And Clifton Heights is just a neighborhood on a cliff near downtown Louisville. And it’s totally cool that black people live there. I guess that’s weird to you? Why is that weird to you?
 
Last edited:

ConRay9

All-American
Nov 15, 2017
3,199
6,711
0
No, beating Buffalo or Wofford in the tournament is certainly not the same as beating UNC, Auburn, Kansas state or Indiana. Give me a break. Just because you don't like the fact, doesn't make it less valid.

There is a huge difference between power 5 competition and mid major competition.

We laugh at Gonzaga constantly for the mid major conference they play in. We also laugh at KU for losing to Bradley, NIU and Bucknell.

Your opinion on this is just that, an opinion, but losing to every power 5 team we run into, is a problem that young teams will usually have, especially in today's game.

The one P5 team we did manage to beat, had a freshman pg. What does that tell you? I'll give you two guesses, I think you'll need both.

I disagree. I don’t care if the team we’re playing is a power 5 team or not. It’s about seed and it’s about talent. This isn’t football—plenty of great teams are found outside the power 5.

We’ve lost to a non power 5 team in the final four and in the national championship since Cal has been here. Houston 2 years ago was a fantastic team. Wichita State was undefeated—does that win magically mean less? What about Louisville? They weren’t Power 5.

And cmon man, you’re normally a good poster. We can have an adult conversation without you making some pass at my agenda or my intelligence.

I’ve always said this year has been a disaster. I readily admit Cal has lost a few in the tournament the last few years he had no business losing (Auburn, K State, for example). But no offense to those teams, there have been plenty of non power5 teams I would have rather have avoided than those two over the last few years.

The stat itself is nonsensical. The majority of the teams in the tournament are power 5. It’s natural the losses would come to them.

it should have been clear I wasn’t referring to **** state when I made my post, but maybe it wasn’t, I don’t really care either. It’s an extremely inherent cherry picked stat in nature. Why people get worked up about it is beyond me.

I get upset anytime UK loses in the tournament. Unless there’s an egregious difference in seed I can honestly say the conference affiliation of the team we win or lose against means zero to me. Not sure why it matters unless their our rival or some other fact is present.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: kyjeff1

gracetoyou

Heisman
Apr 19, 2009
19,929
28,842
113
Well don’t you think that is exactly why this fan base is the envy of all other schools? None of them have near the number of crazy fans we have. It’s what separates us from all others.

Crazy as in massive support through thick & thin is great! Crazy as in illogical & emotionally blinded is neither good for the program, coaches, players, or recruiting. There is a big difference in good crazy & crazy crazy. And I'm afraid it's the crazy crazy side of BBN that is toxic.
 

UKWildcatT

All-American
Apr 9, 2009
75,546
8,113
0
Watch me catch some cred from the mainstream! I’ll call Kentucky fans inbred hillbillies and the mainstream will love me! Hey Twitter! Look at my post!!!
 

kyjeff1

Heisman
Sep 8, 2012
51,201
71,971
113
I disagree. I don’t care if the team we’re playing is a power 5 team or not. It’s about seed and it’s about talent. This isn’t football—plenty of great teams are found outside the power 5.

We’ve lost to a non power 5 team in the final four and in the national championship since Cal has been here. Houston 2 years ago was a fantastic team. Wichita State was undefeated—does that win magically mean less? What about Louisville? They weren’t Power 5.

And cmon man, you’re normally a good poster. We can have an adult conversation without you making some pass at my agenda or my intelligence.

I’ve always said this year has been a disaster. I readily admit Cal has lost a few in the tournament the last few years he had no business losing (Auburn, K State, for example). But no offense to those teams, there have been plenty of non power5 teams I would have rather have avoided than those two over the last few years.

The stat itself is nonsensical. The majority of the teams in the tournament are power 5. It’s natural the losses would come to them.

it should have been clear I wasn’t referring to **** state when I made my post, but maybe it wasn’t, I don’t really care either. It’s an extremely inherent cherry picked stat in nature. Why people get worked up about it is beyond me.

I get upset anytime UK loses in the tournament. Unless there’s an egregious difference in seed I can honestly say the conference affiliation of the team we win or lose against means zero to me. Not sure why it matters unless their our rival or some other fact is present.
We'll have to agree to disagree. Athletes, talent, size and coaching, at Power 5 schools is at a much higher level than at places like Buffalo and Wofford.

Now, there are exceptions. Wichita State 2014 and Gonzaga, are outliers, but Houston 2019, Wofford 2019, Davidson 2018, Buffalo 2018, Stony Brook 2016, WSU 2017, NKU 2017 and Abilene Christian 2019, are nowhere near the power 5 level.

WSU 2017 and Houston 2019 are close, they were good teams, but the proof is in the pudding. We beat those teams, but lost to Indiana, lost to K-state (without their best player), lost to UNC and lost to Auburn without their best player.

We beat UCLA in 2017, who had a freshman pg as well. The proof is right there.

My apologies for my comment in my last response to you. I was out of line.
 

Tapemaster8

All-Conference
Feb 9, 2003
14,648
3,910
98
Then there is more than one. There is definitely a possum trot in eky
Off topic but I think the WPSD-TV transmitter is in Possum Trot. There may be many Possum Trots, but that is the one I know, near Paducah!
I understand what you are trying to say...but as I have always been told when dealing with a emotional issue look at the numbers. You will have to admit no matter how you feel about Cal that the program is in decline. The reasons I THINK for it and the reasons IT will be hard to get back on track of his earlier ways are these.
1) Cal adopted the one and done when it was brand new and most Coaches were still on the 4 year model
2) When Duke and all other Blue Bloods realized that UK was getting all the stars see 2015 they knew they had to change and as a result they started getting more than their share of them, hence it left UK with fewer to succeed with.
3) Cals best assistants for various reasons left and went in other directions: Antiqua super people person and recruiter, Strickland, very good with guards, Payne, great communicator and big man coach: Hence you left Cal a great salesman without his top advisors and coaches.
4) The big debate about paying college players resulted in part to the NBA offering a alternative to college, get paid and play lots of Bball in G League instead of attending classes which most are thinking they are going to not need for they all believe they can make it to the NBA or at least big money overseas.
5) I dont live very far from Possum Trot and I did feel my Country was disrespected, many of our Dads fought in WW 2 and brothers and even some of us in Vietnam, w know who built this Country and how they did it and we know who is tearing it to shreds. He needs to leave politics out of it and just Coach basketball.
6) I have always heard that if you put a frog in a pot of water on the stove and turn the stove on that it heats up so gradually that the frog will not realize it until it is to late and he will be cooked, I never tried it or saw it done, but you could make the comparison to Cal. Joe B told him when it started that 10 years were about what he could expect, I hoped then he would retire here but now believe Hall and the frog are right.
7) Just as the other coaches changed to adopt the one and done, so Cal can change and correct the ship but he is going to have to make that change: The definition of insanity is doing the same things over and over and expecting different results
Grace To You doesn't live all that far from Possum Trot either, Lol!
 

paul.ksr

All-Conference
Jul 4, 2008
1,690
1,288
0
Off topic but I think the WPSD-TV transmitter is in Possum Trot. There may be many Possum Trots, but that is the one I know, near Paducah!

Grace To You doesn't live all that far from Possum Trot either, Lol!
The WPSD transmitter used to be in Monkeys eyebrow. But I’ve been in Florida the past few years
 

BigBlueFanGA

Heisman
Jun 14, 2005
26,435
23,456
0
My God...Kentucky is only KENTUCKY again because of Calipari. We were a dumpster fire and couldn't attract any top level coaches to save our lives after Tubby and Gillispie. Since the tournament expanded to 64 teams in 1985 Kentucky has made the Final Four 8 times and Calipari is responsible for four of those! 4 Final Fours in the 25 years prior to Cal is an average of 1 every 6.25 years. Cal has made 4 Final Fours in 10 years, so that's an average of 1 every 2.5 years. Shut up and quit overreacting you bunch of babies.
Is your memory really that bad? Please list the multitude of coaches who turned us down. As for the final fours, that's nice but we aren't UT. We don't chase final fours. Cals system doesn't work, it never has. It is nice that you're satisfied with wins and final fours though, good for you.
 

BigBlueFanGA

Heisman
Jun 14, 2005
26,435
23,456
0
I disagree. I don’t care if the team we’re playing is a power 5 team or not. It’s about seed and it’s about talent. This isn’t football—plenty of great teams are found outside the power 5.

We’ve lost to a non power 5 team in the final four and in the national championship since Cal has been here. Houston 2 years ago was a fantastic team. Wichita State was undefeated—does that win magically mean less? What about Louisville? They weren’t Power 5.

And cmon man, you’re normally a good poster. We can have an adult conversation without you making some pass at my agenda or my intelligence.

I’ve always said this year has been a disaster. I readily admit Cal has lost a few in the tournament the last few years he had no business losing (Auburn, K State, for example). But no offense to those teams, there have been plenty of non power5 teams I would have rather have avoided than those two over the last few years.

The stat itself is nonsensical. The majority of the teams in the tournament are power 5. It’s natural the losses would come to them.

it should have been clear I wasn’t referring to **** state when I made my post, but maybe it wasn’t, I don’t really care either. It’s an extremely inherent cherry picked stat in nature. Why people get worked up about it is beyond me.

I get upset anytime UK loses in the tournament. Unless there’s an egregious difference in seed I can honestly say the conference affiliation of the team we win or lose against means zero to me. Not sure why it matters unless their our rival or some other fact is present.
In basketball the Big East is a P5. Don't get caught up in football terms.
 

ConRay9

All-American
Nov 15, 2017
3,199
6,711
0
In basketball the Big East is a P5. Don't get caught up in football terms.

The Big East would probably be considered a Power 6 conference now, but there were a ton of questions about the strength of the conference during and after conference realignment. The teams that remained or had nowhere else to go were seen as a big opportunity loss for them at the time.

Honestly, without Villanova, I’d argue that their status as a power 6 in basketball is not quite as tenable as the others. I’m not gonna go so far as to say they are a lesser conference, but if you look at it without a black and white lens there’s something just different about their status.
 

ConRay9

All-American
Nov 15, 2017
3,199
6,711
0
We'll have to agree to disagree. Athletes, talent, size and coaching, at Power 5 schools is at a much higher level than at places like Buffalo and Wofford.

Now, there are exceptions. Wichita State 2014 and Gonzaga, are outliers, but Houston 2019, Wofford 2019, Davidson 2018, Buffalo 2018, Stony Brook 2016, WSU 2017, NKU 2017 and Abilene Christian 2019, are nowhere near the power 5 level.

WSU 2017 and Houston 2019 are close, they were good teams, but the proof is in the pudding. We beat those teams, but lost to Indiana, lost to K-state (without their best player), lost to UNC and lost to Auburn without their best player.

We beat UCLA in 2017, who had a freshman pg as well. The proof is right there.

My apologies for my comment in my last response to you. I was out of line.

You make great, and valid points. I honestly cannot rebut some of the points in good-faith.

I think, for me at least, it just boils down to the nature of some of the teams we’ve squeaked by. In some ways I’d rather face an athletic team from a Power Conference because you’re matching strength with strength. It’s the more skill focused teams such as Wichita and Houston that kept me up at night.

Of course we’re seeing a shift now from teams with overwhelming athleticism over to skill that Cal has GOT to adjust to. But I digress.

Honestly no worries. I enjoy reading your posts. You always bring thoughtful opinions or arguments. We’re all UK fans through and through!
 
Dec 30, 2002
10,641
20,618
0
Is your memory really that bad? Please list the multitude of coaches who turned us down. As for the final fours, that's nice but we aren't UT. We don't chase final fours. Cals system doesn't work, it never has. It is nice that you're satisfied with wins and final fours though, good for you.
Forget about FF. I just wish we were actually in the tournament this year.
 

Anon1712931820

All-Conference
Apr 11, 2008
9,060
2,141
55
Is your memory really that bad? Please list the multitude of coaches who turned us down. As for the final fours, that's nice but we aren't UT. We don't chase final fours. Cals system doesn't work, it never has. It is nice that you're satisfied with wins and final fours though, good for you.
We settled for Billy Gillispie....end of discussion on our list of coaches lining up to take the job after Tubby.

Yeah we are all about those championships every single year right? I mean 7 titles in the 73 years since our first one in 1948 is really setting the world on fire...or is it? I mean that's an average of 1 every 10 years, but hearing people like you talk we are used to winning one every 2-3, right? Wins and Final Fours are what made Kentucky the cream of the crop in the 90's and 2010's...anyone who says its championship or bust really just isn't that smart. Cal's system has gotten more wins, wins in March and more final four appearances than pretty much anyone else in college basketball since he arrived at UK...yeah that means his system hasn't worked lol. You probably need to just quit posting while you may have a tid bit of believability left.
 

kyjeff1

Heisman
Sep 8, 2012
51,201
71,971
113
You make great, and valid points. I honestly cannot rebut some of the points in good-faith.

I think, for me at least, it just boils down to the nature of some of the teams we’ve squeaked by. In some ways I’d rather face an athletic team from a Power Conference because you’re matching strength with strength. It’s the more skill focused teams such as Wichita and Houston that kept me up at night.

Of course we’re seeing a shift now from teams with overwhelming athleticism over to skill that Cal has GOT to adjust to. But I digress.

Honestly no worries. I enjoy reading your posts. You always bring thoughtful opinions or arguments. We’re all UK fans through and through!
Actually, that Wofford team scared the crap out of me. They’re name sounds bad, they're a mid major, but they had uber elite shooters. If they had a good penetrating guard or another talented post player, we probably don't win that game. I couldn't believe how good those guys were from deep.

We also didn't score on offense as easily as we should have.

I really hope Cal upgrades the offense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ConRay9

BigBlueFanGA

Heisman
Jun 14, 2005
26,435
23,456
0
The Big East would probably be considered a Power 6 conference now, but there were a ton of questions about the strength of the conference during and after conference realignment. The teams that remained or had nowhere else to go were seen as a big opportunity loss for them at the time.

Honestly, without Villanova, I’d argue that their status as a power 6 in basketball is not quite as tenable as the others. I’m not gonna go so far as to say they are a lesser conference, but if you look at it without a black and white lens there’s something just different about their status.
They are top 4 in basketball conferences. It isn't really debatable.