Was good to see them use the clock down the stretch and not be snapping the ball with 15-20 seconds left on the clock. We do that against CU and we win the game.
Even the coaches are getting better!
Even the coaches are getting better!
not to mention northwesternWas good to see them use the clock down the stretch and not be snapping the ball with 15-20 seconds left on the clock. We do that against CU and we win the game.
Even the coaches are getting better!
Was good to see them use the clock down the stretch and not be snapping the ball with 15-20 seconds left on the clock. We do that against CU and we win the game.
Even the coaches are getting better!
That's a lot easier to do when you're up by more than two TDs vs being up by less than a field goal.Was good to see them use the clock down the stretch and not be snapping the ball with 15-20 seconds left on the clock. We do that against CU and we win the game.
Even the coaches are getting better!
That's a lot easier to do when you're up by more than two TDs vs being up by less than a field goal.
That's a lot easier to do when you're up by more than two TDs vs being up by less than a field goal.Was good to see them use the clock down the stretch and not be snapping the ball with 15-20 seconds left on the clock. We do that against CU and we win the game.
Even the coaches are getting better!
It made no sense to run the clock in that situation.I disagree. The effectiveness of a play isn't going to necessarily change if you run it with 5 seconds on the play clock as opposed to 20. I understand pace and getting into a rhythm, but if we would have run the play clock down against CU, they would have had a least a minute less to score the winning TD, and they scored it with less than a minute on the clock.