Thon Maker declares for NBA draft

Oct 1, 2005
3,908
548
0
I believe Gabriel would only be eligible to enter draft under the "1 year removed, 19 year old" scenario but not by being determined an "international player." I'm working on a link, but I believe the "international" label is dropped once a player enrolls in and plays at an American school.

So Maker would actually be okay to enter the draft (if allowed) by either route. However Gabriel would only be allowed under the "1 year removed/19" route.


Thon played high school in VA in 13-14, that's not the three years prior to the draft.just two. This comes down too high school graduation date.
 

anon1763419335

All-American
Feb 10, 2006
23,231
5,077
113
His freak show of a recruitment is why Kansas was the only blue blood program that was even trying to recruit him. No shocker that his gandlers are hoping to fill his pockets sooner rather than later. The sooner you fill em, the sooner you can empty em.

what makes me laugh is that ku fans felt he was headed their way. yet maker gives an interview today indicating ASU is where he was leaning.

ku fans think they get everyone its comical. cant wait to see in a month or so about how all the 2017 recruits have ku #1
 

LineSkiCat14

Heisman
Aug 5, 2015
38,891
60,976
113
KU may still roll through the Big12, but they are far off from competing next year. Said this months ago. And I'm sure Kansas fans will gripe at this again, but until I see otherwise, they are a non-factor for the next few years.
 

mjj_2K

All-American
Jul 11, 2010
12,439
7,007
0
NBA owners do not want it and I can appreciate that. As a business owner I want what is best for my business and less risk.

As a UK fan it would be terrible if the old straight to the NBA rule was reestablished now without the 2 year rule accompanying it.
NBA owners have no legal right to exclude 18 year olds from their league. That would be an anti-trust exemption, and the perfect example of collusion. The NBA isn't supposed to be a singular business, it's supposed to be 30 separate businesses competing with each other. If one owner wants to say he won't take an 18 year old for his team, that's fine. He can say he'll only take college grads, or only take guys over 6'5". Whatever, he'll probably be able to do it as long as he's not breaking any federal civil rights' employment laws. However, if all 30 owners get together and try to make those rules league-wide, they're going to have major problems with antitrust violations and collusion.

The only reason owners get any age restriction is because they collectively bargain it with the player's union. Otherwise, someone would challenge it, and they would probably win. The whole reason age restrictions got tossed in the first place was because Sam Shulman, who owned the Sonics, decided that he wanted Spencer Haywood ASAP, and encouraged him to take the league to court. Haywood won that case.
 

mjj_2K

All-American
Jul 11, 2010
12,439
7,007
0
Thon played high school in VA in 13-14, that's not the three years prior to the draft.just two. This comes down too high school graduation date.
Maker is going to be a test case as to what actually constitutes "high school" and what "graduation" actually means in terms of the language of the rule. This was going to come eventually, but Maker is really the first high-profile example, and it will be interesting to see if the NBA focuses just on age, or if they try to tighten down the other aspects of it.
 

Kiimohawk

All-Conference
Oct 11, 2008
47,403
3,561
78
KU may still roll through the Big12, but they are far off from competing next year. Said this months ago. And I'm sure Kansas fans will gripe at this again, but until I see otherwise, they are a non-factor for the next few years.


KU competes every year.
 

LineSkiCat14

Heisman
Aug 5, 2015
38,891
60,976
113
..for a Big12 title.

Face it, they've missed the mark quite a bit since Cal brought Kentucky back to prominence. I will admit that they've surprised me some years when I thought they would have a down year, but managed to win 25+ games. Yet, even in those years, they flame out.

A lot of questions facing that team next year. They need to bat 1.000 the rest of the way on recruiting to even have a chance against Duke and Kentucky. In that regards, yes, they are a non-factor.
 

tHeFeVeR_23

Sophomore
Nov 11, 2010
175
119
0
Some interesting points here that's for sure. All signs are pointing to just terrible representation by his "handlers" and a misinformed teenager. Hope we have nothing to worry about with Wenyen though.
 

brianpoe

Heisman
Mar 25, 2009
27,769
21,825
113
NBA owners have no legal right to exclude 18 year olds from their league. That would be an anti-trust exemption, and the perfect example of collusion. The NBA isn't supposed to be a singular business, it's supposed to be 30 separate businesses competing with each other. If one owner wants to say he won't take an 18 year old for his team, that's fine. He can say he'll only take college grads, or only take guys over 6'5". Whatever, he'll probably be able to do it as long as he's not breaking any federal civil rights' employment laws. However, if all 30 owners get together and try to make those rules league-wide, they're going to have major problems with antitrust violations and collusion.

The only reason owners get any age restriction is because they collectively bargain it with the player's union. Otherwise, someone would challenge it, and they would probably win. The whole reason age restrictions got tossed in the first place was because Sam Shulman, who owned the Sonics, decided that he wanted Spencer Haywood ASAP, and encouraged him to take the league to court. Haywood won that case.



Collective bargaining keeps it legal.

Collective bargaining is here to stay or players wont get paid.