This is why I mock you Dems.
- Thread starter Mntneer
- Start date
Lighten up. Barr is a chickenshit and has fear of and contempt for Congress so why not make light of his fear to testify?This is your party.....
But hey... let's get serious and get to the truth.... AM I RIGHT?! [roll]
Riiiiiight. Only Dims would bring silly props to congress....right?This is your party.....
But hey... let's get serious and get to the truth.... AM I RIGHT?! [roll]
How about Barr growing a pair and showing up? Having lunch at your desk doesn't compare to being in contempt of Congress.
He lobbied for this gig and now he's running for cover. No one said it would be easy. He needs to resign.
But you said THIS is why you mock dems. Don't pretend the GOP has never taken the "moral" high ground and used silly props. It's hypocritical AF. Just embrace your pure partisanship and join THE's meme brigade. That's more honorable, imo.
Oh I can't take credit for creating/running/facilitating this... brigade. It's quite the grass roots operation.
They have, and when they act like fools with it, I'm fine with mocking the **** out of them as well. I have no problem mocking people like Trump. It's so easy to do, and I've done it quite often.
But I tell you what. When you embrace your pure partisanship, then I join a side as well.
This is your party.....
But hey... let's get serious and get to the truth.... AM I RIGHT?! [roll]
Says the guy failing reading comprehension in the other thread. LMAO! Yeah, tell us all about how Mueller believes Barr nailed it on the summary. LOL! That’s why he wrote a letter congratulating him on his accuracy and affirming the summary. LOL!
I know it's easy for you not to get it.... as you usually don't get much.... and I know it's easy to steal an angle and call it your own... but until you aren't shown to be a complete blithering idiot on semi-advanced subjects it would probably be best that you stay in your corner eating crayons.
but the libs are so good at it...
Rep. Luis Gutierrez, a Democrat from Illinois, illustrated his opposition to Arizona's SB1070, also known as the "Show Me Your Papers" law, with a "pick out the immigrant" quiz. At one point, he compared pop stars Selena Gomez and Justin Bieber. "This is for our young C-SPAN," he said, noting that while Gomez might have a Latino-sounding name and Bieber is white, Gomez is in fact the American and Bieber, a Canadian, is the immigrant. "Justin, when you perform in Phoenix, remember to bring your papers," he quipped.
Former Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders, an independent senator from Vermont, brought a poster printed with President Donald Trump's tweet promising to protect Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid from funding cuts to the Senate floor. Sanders has been critical of Trump's newfound support for dramatic cuts to Medicaid and other government services.
Trump ducked giving sworn testimony to Mueller. Barr ducked giving testimony to the House which is not controlled by his party. Those are really strong points with which to hammer them PR-wise and in upcoming elections. To twist Natalie Portman's line in the movie Thor, that's a really bad look.
Why did the Democrats decide to screw that up with a childish prop that switches the focus from Barr to them?
Why did the Democrats decide to screw that up with a childish prop that switches the focus from Barr to them?
Fully agree. I'm all for roasting that Dem for the chicken prop. Doesn't matter if others on both sides have done similar; just those acting holier than thou are hypocritical as usual.
This is serious ****. Elected officials need to act like it. I've never been a Pelosi fan but her actions and behavior lately have been spot on.
I wonder why Barr never answered Kamala's question "did anyone in the White House suggest you start an investigation on anyone?"
How could he have possibly answered that? I mean, first of all, what in the bloody hell does the word "suggestion" even mean? No need to throw around fancy words there, Kamala.
Asking if the President is trying to use the DOJ for political prosecutions is irrelevant to congressional oversight?
Been wrong before, but guessing when the EVIDENCE is presented to the public (ie Strzok insurance policy, FISA abuse, etc. etc. ), ............. it will be OVERWHELMING.