If the shooters you suggest are consistent, then I would have to say NCAA tournament. There is such a slight difference between six point losses and six point wins. If we had two more quality shooters we would now be 16-6 or 15-7. That's how close we would be with two quality additional shooters.I don’t know the game as much as the rest of you but what would/could we be if my thread title happens?
I’m gonna go with you would have 7 guys on the court and get a T.
Last nights game had to set college hoops back a few years. Both teams looked to be attending a brick laying convention.
That is called strong defense, huskeralways. Defense.
Sa was brought in by Pike. Doorsen had a decent game. Would be nice to see him return and have a solid senior year.We saw improvement from Thiam and Omoruyi, while Sanders, Freeman, Williams, and Sa either stayed the same or took a step back this season. Optimistically, we saw improvement from the players that Pikiell and this staff recruited while the upperclassmen spun their wheels. Hopefully that keeps up and Omoruyi/Thiam continue to develop and Baker, Doucoure, Johnson, and Kiss follow the same kind of path.
Sa was brought in by Pike. Doorsen had a decent game. Would be nice to see him return and have a solid senior year.
For some teams 3 pointers are easier than layups.Sadly,some other teams have great difficulty making any type of shot.We need a reliable guy that can make 1 footers.
The Knight Report
Rutgers Football Training Camp: Day Three Takeaways - TKR Pod
On3
Greg McElroy breaks down Big Ten into contending tiers ahead of 2026 season
On3
Ranking every Big Ten head coach's all-time record against AP Top 25 opponents
On3
ESPN names biggest archenemies for every Big Ten school
The Knight Report
Six Years Later, Rutgers Football has quietly transformed the Offensive Line room