THE?
- Thread starter Boomboom521
- Start date
Is this really what you wanted to see Boom? Half redacted and still a ton of damning information.
I’ve been reading. It is an ongoing investigation, so I get that there is a lot redacted. Of course I want more information. But what I see: 1) the dossier was in no way the only information used 2) Steele’s association with political funding was disclosed clearly
Nunes memo was Bullsh1t
Nunes memo was Bullsh1t
Citing WaPo editorials is not other information. Newspaper articles in the echo chamber are not other information. That’s all BS. The dossier was the source of almost all of it.
What can you ascertain from that? Trump needs to declassify everything related and let the people make their own decision.
1) There is no way anyone can say that anything is 95% of the application with the redactions.
2) Page 53 is the sign off of the FBI that all information within the application pertaining to Page is true. The application literally says that the reporting of source #1 (Simpson /Fusion GPS) was credible (due to the FBI relying on him before, and that there was no reasons to suspect his accuracy or motivation to be suspect). NOT that the information has been confirmed by the FBI.
3) Page’s own interviews with the FBI were used in the application
4) Page’s business and business ties were used in the application
5) it was fully disclosed that source #1 was paid to find information that discredited candidate #1’s campaign. Couldn’t have been missed by the court OR BY NUNES - GOWDY - OR THEIR STAFF that claimed it wasn’t disclosed
Are you serious? Everyone screamed bloody murder. The Brits, Aussies, and Frogs, all of our “allies” called him and begged him not to. You missed all of the leftist rhetoric? Hahaha
Trump gained more in favors owed from that announcement than people will ever know. You are correct, he was begged to walk back on that and in doing so gained deep state favors. I truly believe that.
When I reference deep state, I mean intelligence communities both near and far...
I was right with Kav being voted on last week, let's double down. It'll be 99%ish (as much as our "allies" can handle) declassified this week.
Please keep up. Footnote 53 was redacted, discussing whom Baker was meeting with. Baker stated in declassified setting it was Sussmann.
It’s being “reviewed” for declassification. My guess is that it won’t see the light of day and if it does, it’ll be the end of this month of early next month, just in time for the mid terms.
The threat of him releasing the info will effectively bring closure to a couple of things.