This was a subject in another thread, thought it might need its own discussion.
First, I am NOT against the walk-on program. As I said in the other thread, years ago, I knew several people who walked on under Tom's tenure. But what will be accomplished with a roster of 150 and a scholarship limit of 85?
Anyone who has coached will tell you numbers are important to a team but there is a limit. You do not get more coaches for higher numbers of players so your player to coach ratio naturally goes up and reps have to go down. I know I sound like a broken record here as I have said this before.
There will always be that kid who develops and becomes a contributor to the program but what is the sweet spot of walk-on's to make the best use of resources? And regardless of what people think, there is a limit to the Husker resources.
High schools are much better at developing players now than they were many years ago. Shoot, Husker Power was way ahead of its time in colleges in the past, now many HS's have some of the same the programs. Kids are much more developed now than they once were.
Currently, there are questions about "player development" in the program. So, my question is do you spread out your coaches over more players and expect to get a higher level of player development? More players could help in the reps category for scrimmages and drills but what is that number?.
Scott is the boss of it all and they are obviously putting a ton of resources into that area of the overall program. What is the ROI on that?
Ask yourself what the overall goal of the walk-on program is? If it is to get more players? Fine, it can't be to get better players - that is a product of excellent recruiting. Is the walk-on program designed to plug holes in recruiting or development? Better recruiting will naturally make the walk-on program in less demand. If you have a limited amount of resources - where do you put it?
Fire away.
Edit: And I do understand the desire/goal to increase connections between the program and the state with getting more Nebraska HS players on the team. How do you measure that investment?
First, I am NOT against the walk-on program. As I said in the other thread, years ago, I knew several people who walked on under Tom's tenure. But what will be accomplished with a roster of 150 and a scholarship limit of 85?
Anyone who has coached will tell you numbers are important to a team but there is a limit. You do not get more coaches for higher numbers of players so your player to coach ratio naturally goes up and reps have to go down. I know I sound like a broken record here as I have said this before.
There will always be that kid who develops and becomes a contributor to the program but what is the sweet spot of walk-on's to make the best use of resources? And regardless of what people think, there is a limit to the Husker resources.
High schools are much better at developing players now than they were many years ago. Shoot, Husker Power was way ahead of its time in colleges in the past, now many HS's have some of the same the programs. Kids are much more developed now than they once were.
Currently, there are questions about "player development" in the program. So, my question is do you spread out your coaches over more players and expect to get a higher level of player development? More players could help in the reps category for scrimmages and drills but what is that number?.
Scott is the boss of it all and they are obviously putting a ton of resources into that area of the overall program. What is the ROI on that?
Ask yourself what the overall goal of the walk-on program is? If it is to get more players? Fine, it can't be to get better players - that is a product of excellent recruiting. Is the walk-on program designed to plug holes in recruiting or development? Better recruiting will naturally make the walk-on program in less demand. If you have a limited amount of resources - where do you put it?
Fire away.
Edit: And I do understand the desire/goal to increase connections between the program and the state with getting more Nebraska HS players on the team. How do you measure that investment?
Last edited: