Toggle sidebar

The Timeout That Never Was...

R

R1766U_rivals

All-Conference
Jan 17, 2014
1,290
1,495
113
Anyone know why we were not given a timeout on the last inbound (2OT)? Torturing myself and re-watching the end of the game. Noticed that Paul and Pikiell were both trying to call timeout on the inbounds. Did the refs just not see them?

 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: RCBeta79, Scangg, biker7766 and 1 other person
RW90

RW90

All-American
Feb 2, 2002
8,345
7,584
113
R1766U said:
Anyone know why we were not given a timeout on the last inbound? Torturing myself and re-watching the end of the game. Noticed that Paul and Pikiell were both trying to call timeout on the inbounds. Did the refs just not see them?
Click to expand...
Not sure the inbounder gave them the option by throwing it in so quickly. Would also have been nice for the refs to check the video to adjust clock which could have given us time to set one last play.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ScarletKid2008 and RUDiddy777
RW90

RW90

All-American
Feb 2, 2002
8,345
7,584
113
RW90 said:
Not sure the inbounder gave them the option by throwing it in so quickly. Would also have been nice for the refs to check the video to adjust clock which could have given us time to set one last play.
Click to expand...
Just rewatched the video (see below). Caleb simply was on autopilot and never even paused on the final throw in. What made it worse was having our bench at the opposite end of the court.
 
Last edited:
P

phlop87

Senior
Aug 6, 2003
1,355
906
113
Actually the timeout that was more crucial (if we had one and I think we did) we should have called timeout after paul made his 3 at the end of firstOT. would have allowed RU to set up the D. And also sub in mag or killer Oh well hindsight is 20/20
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUDiddy777, BlockR and Scangg
B

BOCA93

All-Conference
Jan 16, 2012
2,951
3,710
61
It’s obvious on the replay that Paul was trying to call TO right in front of the ref but the ref didn’t see it because Caleb inbounded so quickly.
 
R

rob kight

All-American
Oct 22, 2020
4,918
6,249
113
RW90 said:
Not sure the inbounder gave them the option by throwing it in so quickly. Would also have been nice for the refs to check the video to adjust clock which could have given us time to set one last play.
Click to expand...
Only given that opportunity if you are RU opponent
 
H

HPNJRUfan

All-Conference
Mar 6, 2003
11,218
2,693
76
 
K

Kwonster

Redshirt
Dec 1, 2012
11
5
0
Can a time out only be called when the player has the ball and not right after the made shot?
 
RUfromSoCal?

RUfromSoCal?

Heisman
Nov 26, 2006
34,652
42,653
113
Was in Dayton - so missed this thread.....
had to dig to find it....

I know you can't "relitigate"...... so, I'm not sure the point.... but, never-the-less...

I see EVERYTHING reviewed and whistled and checked twice in the final 0:59.0secs of a game......... can someone explain to me HTF this is NOT a timeout?? HTF it doesn't get reviewed?

I've seen Purdue get TOs with 0.6sec on the clock... I've seen Michigan get 0.5 added to the time... I've seen us screwed a dozen times with less than :01sec on the clock..........

how is this not a CLEAR timeout????

someone? Anyone? what is going on here...... how is this not a HUGE issue?????

 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: RutHut_rivals and socaldave
L

Loyal_2RU

Heisman
Aug 6, 2001
15,233
11,046
113
RUfromSoCal? said:
Was in Dayton - so missed this thread.....
had to dig to find it....

I know you can't "relitigate"...... so, I'm not sure the point.... but, never-the-less...

I see EVERYTHING reviewed and whistled and checked twice in the final :59 of a game......... can someone explain to me HTF this is NOT a timeout?? HTF it doesn't get reviewed?

I've seen Purdue get TOs with 0.06 on the clock... I've seen Michigan get 0.5 added to the time... I've seen us screwed a dozen times with less than :01 on the clock..........

how is this not a CLEAR timeout????

someone? Anyone? what is going on here...... how is this not a HUGE issue?????

Click to expand...
Would like the mods to get an answer for this. Curious minds want to know.
@Richard Schnyderite
 
RUfromSoCal?

RUfromSoCal?

Heisman
Nov 26, 2006
34,652
42,653
113
I know this is a huge/busy weekend for hoops fans... so, not sure people have even read this.

but, @Craig Epstein @ChrisNalwasky I'll bump this one last time....... if anyone has heard an answer or even knows if it matters... I'd love to know...
 
Craig Epstein

Craig Epstein

All-Conference
Staff member
Jan 15, 2020
901
1,728
93
RUfromSoCal? said:
I know this is a huge/busy weekend for hoops fans... so, not sure people have even read this.

but, @Craig Epstein @ChrisNalwasky I'll bump this one last time....... if anyone has heard an answer or even knows if it matters... I'd love to know...
Click to expand...
Just saw this thread. From where I was sitting I noticed Paul was trying to call a TO but wasn’t rewarded. I’m guessing with everything going on and how fast Rutgers inbounded the ball the refs didn’t see/hear them. We never got a definitive answer but that would be my best guess.
 
Craig Epstein

Craig Epstein

All-Conference
Staff member
Jan 15, 2020
901
1,728
93
Loyal_2RU said:
Shouldn't that be reviewable as a correctable error related to timing?
Click to expand...
To my knowledge you can’t review whether or not somebody tried to call a TO (or at least I’ve never seen it). Just a case of bad luck for Rutgers.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom