The term indisputiable just got more confusing in the SEC.

[TheBigDA]

Wow.

 

[weblow]

I still cannot get past the quote from earlier in the week about reasonable doubt.

 

[thunderclap]

what is going on in that replay booth is dumbfounding.

 

[fieldman]

Thats the same referee crew from the MSU/UF game, don't know if they keep the same replay official though.

What a strange world we are living in

 

[Thick]

nm

 

[MSUCostanza]

they are flipping a coin in the replay booth. Heads = call stands. Tails = reversed. That's about the only thing that makes sense as to what they are looking at in there. That was a horrible call - there is no way that was indisputable evidence. Hopefully all the attention will bring about some changes. You would think it would - I doubt the SEC likes to be in the news every week defending their officials.

 

[MSU CS 2004]

That was farking ********.

I don't like Ole Miss. I like Auburn. But that was farking ********.

 

[bulldogs726]

There is absolutely no way that is indisputable. This is just getting a little ridiculous

 

[ckDOG]

How is that indisputable? 17 you Slives.

 

[maroonmania]

noway was that as clear cut as either of the supposesd Lee illegal forward pass (Houston), the supposed ball off the foot of our punt coverage guy (MTSU) or the Florida fumble at the goal line but all of those stood as called on the field. Seems to me to be a different standard when MSU is involved.

 

[Rezpup]

I used to think I was just biased.

 

[8dog]

d

 

[maroonmania]

the very week he said he thought the replay system was working quite well.

 

[Rabid]

Heads - catch.

Tails - no catch.

The results would be the same. These "officials" have no clue.

 

[Rabid]

I should have read the whole thread ....