You keep using the word infractions. That's not what we're talking about--at least not me.
Once word of the report being finalized started circulating, people were told that the "report" DID NOT contain possible NCAA infractions. However, it did paint Julie in a very poor light as the manager in charge of making sure all of her teams were following INTERNAL policies and procedures related to drug testing.
Nothing Barchi said contradicts that.
The report does not contain NCAA violations. There is no other shoe to drop about the report. However, what people are saying is the report DOES contain evidence that Julie did not do a good enough job fostering a culture of compliance with the already established university policies and procedures related to drug testing. And she paid for those mistakes with her job.
I think this it's very plausible there were no NCAA violations, but that there were egregious internal errors made by Julie, given what we've seen, especially with regard to how quietly Julie left - there really must've been some dirt on her to leave without a fuss.
I also believe if there were any NCAA infractions, we would have had to come clean on them as soon as we knew about them. Covering up infractions can be far worse than just having infractions (especially minor ones) - self-reporting is always the best path with any potential infractions. So, I don't believe there were any infractions.
But having said all that, I'm not convinced there couldn't be some "other (non-NCAA-infraction) shoe to drop" in this situation. As der pointed out, it took months for the Rice video to surface and it's possible there are embarrassing revelations to be found in this report, which could still see the light of day in the future. The Rice situation was not about NCAA infractions, which are usually centered on institutional lying or cheating to gain some athletic advantage (typically with cutting academic or eligibility corners and/or providing unfair economic benefits to players).
No, the Rice mess was about abusive behavior by a coach (no "advantage" there - look at the record, lol), compounded by horrible judgment by an AD in not firing said coach immediately upon seeing the video (as I said, the cover-up is always worse than the deed). Let's hope there really is no other shoe to drop, but I won't believe we're out of the woods until quite some time has passed.