The House Should Expel...

bornaneer

All-Conference
Jan 23, 2014
30,911
1,612
113
this lying *******:
 

moe

Junior
May 29, 2001
32,836
273
83
While you're at it, throw out the congressional seditionists. Throw out the 139 Repub House members and 8 Repub Senators who defied the will of the voters in their states and voted not to accept the state certified 2020 presidential vote results.
 

bornaneer

All-Conference
Jan 23, 2014
30,911
1,612
113
While you're at it, throw out the congressional seditionists. Throw out the 139 Repub House members and 8 Repub Senators who defied the will of the voters in their states and voted not to accept the state certified 2020 presidential vote results.
Lying and disagreeing are different. Who got you into the "seditionists" crap ? Have any of the 147 congress members been charged with with a subversive act ?
 

ThePunish-EER

Freshman
Aug 19, 2005
13,313
59
0
While you're at it, throw out the congressional seditionists. Throw out the 139 Repub House members and 8 Repub Senators who defied the will of the voters in their states and voted not to accept the state certified 2020 presidential vote results.
So they don’t have a right and obligation to question and make sure the election results were fair, legal, and free? If the results don’t meet that criteria, then it seems that Democrats denied the will of the voters in their states.
 

moe

Junior
May 29, 2001
32,836
273
83
Lying and disagreeing are different.
"Disagreeing" lol. So that's what you call it? After the election is complete and certified by each state's SOS, then the individual congresspersons get to see if they agree or disagree with the certified results?! lol That's how they want it to work in MAGA dreamland but it doesn't work that way in a democratic U.S. What do you think those 147 would have done if Trump would have won? Of course, they would have voted to accept the results. You don't get to accept the election results only if your guy wins. Shew.

Sedition is overt conduct, such as speech or organization, that tends toward rebellion against the established order. Sedition often includes subversion of a constitution and incitement of discontent toward, or insurrection against, established authority.
 

ThePunish-EER

Freshman
Aug 19, 2005
13,313
59
0
"Disagreeing" lol. So that's what you call it? After the election is complete and certified by each state's SOS, then the individual congresspersons get to see if they agree or disagree with the certified results?! lol That's how they want it to work in MAGA dreamland but it doesn't work that way in a democratic U.S. What do you think those 147 would have done if Trump would have won? Of course, they would have voted to accept the results. You don't get to accept the election results only if your guy wins. Shew.

Sedition is overt conduct, such as speech or organization, that tends toward rebellion against the established order. Sedition often includes subversion of a constitution and incitement of discontent toward, or insurrection against, established authority.
Again doofus, are you saying nobody representing these states has the right or ability to ensure a free and fair election? Do they not have the obligation to make sure state election laws were not broken?
 

bornaneer

All-Conference
Jan 23, 2014
30,911
1,612
113
"Disagreeing" lol. So that's what you call it? After the election is complete and certified by each state's SOS, then the individual congresspersons get to see if they agree or disagree with the certified results?! lol That's how they want it to work in MAGA dreamland but it doesn't work that way in a democratic U.S. What do you think those 147 would have done if Trump would have won? Of course, they would have voted to accept the results. You don't get to accept the election results only if your guy wins. Shew.

Sedition is overt conduct, such as speech or organization, that tends toward rebellion against the established order. Sedition often includes subversion of a constitution and incitement of discontent toward, or insurrection against, established authority.
You think the "Hamilton Electors" were/are "seditionists" ?
BTW.....you want me to provide you a few more sedition electors ?
 

moe

Junior
May 29, 2001
32,836
273
83
You think the "Hamilton Electors" were/are "seditionists" ?
BTW.....you want me to provide you a few more sedition electors ?
Did they take over the Capitol building and seek to kill the VP and other elected leaders? Was there a months (years) long effort of lying to the public about election integrity and slates of fake electors involved?
 
Last edited:

bornaneer

All-Conference
Jan 23, 2014
30,911
1,612
113
Did they take over the Capitol building and seek to kill the VP and other elected leaders? Was there a months (years) long effort of lying to the public about election integrity and slates of fake electors involved?
LOL......so now you are claiming that 147 congress members tried to take over the Capitol building and seeked to kill the VP and other elected leaders ?

Truly laughable
 

roadtrasheer

All-Conference
Sep 9, 2016
18,108
2,174
113
LOL......so now you are claiming that 147 congress members tried to take over the Capitol building and seeked to kill the VP and other elected leaders ?

Truly laughable
Not one of the board democrats would condemn her ....she is a fellow socialists
 

bornaneer

All-Conference
Jan 23, 2014
30,911
1,612
113
Not one of the board democrats would condemn her ....she is a fellow socialists
Moe and his followers are so full of hate for Repubs.... that they will NEVER say a word against ANY Democrat......sad...sad....sad.
 

SoCo

Senior
May 29, 2001
35,815
514
113
While you're at it, throw out the congressional seditionists. Throw out the 139 Repub House members and 8 Repub Senators who defied the will of the voters in their states and voted not to accept the state certified 2020 presidential vote results.
I am fine with that as long as we can throw out all those who voted to impeach Trump on the Russia collusion charge which they knew was false.

Sounds like you want to drain the swamp too. Welcome aboard!
 

bornaneer

All-Conference
Jan 23, 2014
30,911
1,612
113
Ask those serving time for it if it's a theory.
NONE of the 145 Repub Congress members are serving any time........that makes you a conspiracy theorist........You are a dangerous dude.......AND President Trump was found NOT Guilty .......NOT GUILTY in an actual trial conducted in the bi partisan Senate.

Luckily for you......all of Trumps new troubles are ALL highly partisan....so even a miserable person like you can have a little enjoyment.
 
Last edited:

ThePunish-EER

Freshman
Aug 19, 2005
13,313
59
0
Huh? lol You spend a lot of time apologizing for those who tried to overthrow the government and that's truly pathetic.
So we shouldn’t expect our state and federal representative’s to make sure election laws are followed? And they shouldn’t question any results when discrepancies are found? Is that the message you want? If so, welcome to a banana republic where the people have no voice.
 

bornaneer

All-Conference
Jan 23, 2014
30,911
1,612
113
Huh? lol You spend a lot of time apologizing for those who tried to overthrow the government and that's truly pathetic.
I post FACTS......not conspiracy theories. Again, being the conspiracy theorist that you are, NONE of the 145 Repub Congress members you accused of overthrowing the Government were EVER charged with any crime.
 

bornaneer

All-Conference
Jan 23, 2014
30,911
1,612
113
Huh? lol You spend a lot of time apologizing for those who tried to overthrow the government and that's truly pathetic.
I have never apologized for any of the nuts that stormed the Capitol......they broke the law and they deservedly are paying the price.

They had ZERO chance of overthrowing the government......only an idiot would think otherwise.......they were part of a protest that ramped up out of control.....dumb....dumb.....dumb.
 

ThePunish-EER

Freshman
Aug 19, 2005
13,313
59
0
I have never apologized for any of the nuts that stormed the Capitol......they broke the law and they deservedly are paying the price.

They had ZERO chance of overthrowing the government......only an idiot would think otherwise.......they were part of a protest that ramped up out of control.....dumb....dumb.....dumb.
Yeah and I think the majority of it was staged and instigated. Too bad we can’t have a real investigation as to who and what groups were really involved. I’d say many were connections to Donkeys
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,202
5,693
113
While you're at it, throw out the congressional seditionists. Throw out the 139 Repub House members and 8 Repub Senators who defied the will of the voters in their states and voted not to accept the state certified 2020 presidential vote results.
Are you including all the Democratic delegations in 2016 who refused to accept the results of that election? (I can post them for you if you forgot) Why are you folks on the Left such flaming hypocrites?

Good Lord!🙄
 

bornaneer

All-Conference
Jan 23, 2014
30,911
1,612
113
Are you including all the Democratic delegations in 2016 who refused to accept the results of that election? (I can post them for you if you forgot) Why are you folks on the Left such flaming hypocrites?

Good Lord!🙄
The dude can't deal with FACTS.
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,202
5,693
113
Huh? lol You spend a lot of time apologizing for those who tried to overthrow the government and that's truly pathetic.
You looked past the Democrats who staged their "insurance policy" after the 2016 election and it's truly comical. (Plus it was illegal)
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,202
5,693
113
"Disagreeing" lol. So that's what you call it? After the election is complete and certified by each state's SOS, then the individual congresspersons get to see if they agree or disagree with the certified results?! lol That's how they want it to work in MAGA dreamland but it doesn't work that way in a democratic U.S. What do you think those 147 would have done if Trump would have won? Of course, they would have voted to accept the results. You don't get to accept the election results only if your guy wins. Shew.

Sedition is overt conduct, such as speech or organization, that tends toward rebellion against the established order. Sedition often includes subversion of a constitution and incitement of discontent toward, or insurrection against, established authority.
So you're saying this has never happened with Democrats? You are either ignorant or a liar. No on second thought, you're both.
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,202
5,693
113
So @moe not only do you ignore the reams of Democrats "denying" election results, you were 100% silent while they in fact carried out an illegal plot to overturn the results they didn't like in 2016! Not a word from you as the losing party illegally spied on the winning opposition party while using the DOJ to totally fabricate the lie that the winner stole it by "colluding" with Russians!

Why have you not called for any of those involved in that illegal scheme to be at least prosecuted or thrown out of office like you're calling for Republicans who engaged in none of that in 2020?

I know you won't respond and I'm glad you can't because your hypocracy is on full display for all readers of this forum who can have a good laugh over how comically obvious you are about it!

Keep us entertained you two faced bot. Your neurolingustic proamming is pure wholesome family entertainment. 😆
 

moe

Junior
May 29, 2001
32,836
273
83
They had ZERO chance of overthrowing the government......only an idiot would think otherwise.......they were part of a protest that ramped up out of control.....dumb....dumb.....dumb.
Are you just stupid or trolling? not sure and not interested to find out.