He had to help on Wolf. He was playing help defense on a better player and they made a deep shot. Was not a failed close outWill go down as infamous moment here at Rutgers.
Exactly. With 3 seconds left, if Wolf drives, Harper has to be there to double on the final shot. Typically would be a better chance than a game winner from 30+ feet.He had to help on Wolf. He was playing help defense on a better player and they made a deep shot. Was not a failed close out
I dont think this moment or loss will be remembered much at allWill go down as infamous moment here at Rutgers.
Clearly not the play or shot they wanted. But don’t let it interfere with your agenda.They ran a very nice play that worked getting a great shot, unlike Pike plays (oh he doesn't have plays).
He did not have to help on Wolf, Wolf was double teamed he was just standing in no mans land and if he was on his man Wolf would have never been able to get the ball to himHe had to help on Wolf. He was playing help defense on a better player and they made a deep shot. Was not a failed close out
They didn't run any play the guy was standing 30 feet from the basket and it was a desperation pass and a great shot unguardedThey ran a very nice play that worked getting a great shot, unlike Pike plays (oh he doesn't have plays).
I dont think this moment or loss will be remembered much at all
This is kind of my thought, from memory haven't rewatched, but I didn't think Wolf was any threat w the ball at that moment. He wasn't about to turn the corner, seemed off balance even.He did not have to help on Wolf, Wolf was double teamed he was just standing in no mans land and if he was on his man Wolf would have never been able to get the ball to him
It will go down as just another loss in a lost seasonI dont think this moment or loss will be remembered much at all
He did not have to help on Wolf, Wolf was double teamed he was just standing in no mans land and if he was on his man Wolf would have never been able to get the ball to him
Correct.He absolutely did NOT have to help, he was out of position and was in no man’s land . Protect their best outside shooter, that was his only task. Drive and kick must ALWAYS be protected. Period.
We were up 1 point bud.Correct.
People here defending Harper is ridiculous …also they were not math majors at Rutgers, obviously
we were up 2 . The only shot that is gonna beat you is a 3 point play ! That I am the first person to mention this in the analysis of the play this far into the thread shows you how little people here know basketball or math
Up 1 math major and basketball savant.Correct.
People here defending Harper is ridiculous …also they were not math majors at Rutgers, obviously
we were up 2 . The only shot that is gonna beat you is a 3 point play ! That I am the first person to mention this in the analysis of the play this far into the thread shows you how little people here know basketball or math
Crediting yourself for being the only one to bring up a non fact and act as if it were real is actually something that happens often nowadays, can't even say it's suprising.Correct.
People here defending Harper is ridiculous …also they were not math majors at Rutgers, obviously
we were up 2 . The only shot that is gonna beat you is a 3 point play ! That I am the first person to mention this in the analysis of the play this far into the thread shows you how little people here know basketball or math
We were up 82-81. This Stings, but a drive by Wolf for a layup would have been infuriating. I guess you can live with an nba 3 pointer in this situation.Correct.
People here defending Harper is ridiculous …also they were not math majors at Rutgers, obviously
we were up 2 . The only shot that is gonna beat you is a 3 point play ! That I am the first person to mention this in the analysis of the play this far into the thread shows you how little people here know basketball or math
Apparently you're not a math major either. They were up 1. Legend my ***.Correct.
People here defending Harper is ridiculous …also they were not math majors at Rutgers, obviously
we were up 2 . The only shot that is gonna beat you is a 3 point play ! That I am the first person to mention this in the analysis of the play this far into the thread shows you how little people here know basketball or math
You’re correct . My mistake . I own it! SorryCrediting yourself for being the only one to bring up a non fact and act as if it were real is actually something that happens often nowadays, can't even say it's suprising.
Still a legend ! Even Namath and Jordan lost games . Ali lost fights . Brady lost super bowls …plum makes 1 inaccurate comment in a thread after a bungling loss ! Not my fault we lostApparently you're not a math major either. They were up 1. Legend my ***.
Yes I was wrong …my mistake.We were up 1 point bud.
You love to create drama with threads, its odd.
No one will really remember because this season has been an abortion.
I dont think this moment or loss will be remembered much at all
Agree
“Infamous”?
What is OP smoking. This was a meaningless regular season game.
we were up 1 you live with them making a 30 footer and not losing to a 7 footer making a 1 foot layupHe absolutely did NOT have to help, he was out of position and was in no man’s land . Protect their best outside shooter, that was his only task. Drive and kick must ALWAYS be protected. Period.
It just summed up the year
Exactly the memory will be a failure on the season...this particular game just one of many receiptsIt will go down as just another loss in a lost season
RU ran a nice play to start the second half resulting in a dunk for Grant.They ran a very nice play that worked getting a great shot, unlike Pike plays (oh he doesn't have plays).