The thing is there really isn't any medical condition that would prevent you from wearing a mask.
Tate needs to do this yesterday. It's getting out of hand here.
Dog12 appears to think that even wearing a mask at all is unreasonable.
So you are equating a 50 cent mask with a full hazmat suite? That's just stupid, plain out old dumbass stupid.
Would wearing a full hazmat suit help to slow the spread even more than wearing a mask? If so, then why don't we require full hazmat suits?
My point is this: which safety precautions are reasonable? That's what the debate is about.
In my opinion, requiring people to wear a mask is unreasonable.
Clearly, based upon all the bitching and moaning by mask-wearers, lots of people agree with me and choose not to wear a mask.
As for masks, I dont like wearing one, but do when its advisable and it just isnt difficult to do it. I went with my oldest kid to buy shoes yesterday and we spent 45min in a small running shop getting her set up with good shoes. We had to wear masks because the store requires it. It was quite simple and successful. I cant imagine how anyone could go thru that event and declare it to be unreasonable.
Would wearing a full hazmat suit help to slow the spread even more than wearing a mask? If so, then why don't we require full hazmat suits?
My point is this: which safety precautions are reasonable? That's what the debate is about.
In my opinion, requiring people to wear a mask is unreasonable.
Clearly, based upon all the bitching and moaning by mask-wearers, lots of people agree with me and choose not to wear a mask.
————
Good grief, if wearing a mask can protect others from you should you be a symptomatic you should as a decent human being wear a mask. It is good to occasionally think about someone other than yourself.
If you were having surgery, would you prefer the surgical staff to wear a mask?
Basically right now wearing a mask is an audition for the Darwin Awards. If you wear one, you don't qualify. The trouble is, those that don't wear one can take out those that do.
Are you saying that performing surgery is the equivalent of running to the grocery store to buy a loaf of bread?
Masks are not contraindicated with asthma. If anything they are even more recomended.Then you simply say I have asthma and game over.
How much did you bet? Because you lost it. There is no may or may not about masks. You people are letting emotions get in the way of science. Also, I take it you aren't familiar with the Darwin Awards. Not everyone that does something stupid manages to kill themselves or otherwise remove themselves from the gene pool. But if you do something stupid and do, you qualify. Not wearing a mask inside in public is doing something stupid.Not wearing a mask, that may or may not help, in response to a disease that over 99% of people who contract survive is not exactly social Darwinism. Also, I bet you would argue that protesting in the freeway is necessary. #joke
LOL, It was actually an attempt to appeal to the same thing you are, emotion. You have obviously rejected the science.This is a great example of the "bitching and moaning" and attempted shaming that is all too-common among mask-wearers.
How much did you bet? Because you lost it. There is no may or may not about masks. You people are letting emotions get in the way of science. Also, I take it you aren't familiar with the Darwin Awards. Not everyone that does something stupid manages to kill themselves or otherwise remove themselves from the gene pool. But if you do something stupid and do, you qualify. Not wearing a mask inside in public is doing something stupid.
The vast majority of medical opinion says there are no real contraidications to wearing a mask.That's simply your opinion . . . which has no effect on the Executive Order set forth in Virginia.
The exceptions to wearing a mask in the Executive Order fail to specifically define the "health conditions that prohibit wearing a face covering."
Thus, the Executive Order is very broad and vague concerning such "health conditions."
I think the Governor of Virginia intentionally wrote this broad/vague language into the Executive Order so that each person having the "health condition" could decide for himself/herself.
Otherwise, what would the Governor do? Provide a list of all "health conditions" that fall under the mask-wearing exception? Ha ha, that's funny.
What if you've already had the virus and recovered? If you have the antibodies...isn't it general consensus you can no longer contract it again, therefore you won't be able to spread it? I would think there's no reason for that person to wear a mask.
Not referring to myself, though part of me wishes I was since I'm still alive to type this. The other part of me wishes I don't have to go through contracting it.
Yes.
And in the opinion of those that understand germ theory and actively work in Stokes Law, You are an idiot.Then, in my opinion, you are unreasonable.
Also, in light of your answer, I can now better understand why you write the statements contained in your posts.
An aside: are you and L4 the same person?
Never smoked in my life. I watched a grandfather who lived with us cough his lungs up with emphysema. Driving car only qualifies you for a Darwin if you are doing something stupid in it. Normal driving no, driving 110mph on I55, yes. Not getting a flu shot and right now not wearing a mask is just dumb stupid. If your not wearing a mask only affected you I wouldn't care. Kill yourself. But that isn't how it works. it affects everyone around you.The rules of your made up game are ridiculous. Using your logic, anyone that chooses to drive a car or not get the yearly flu shot qualifies for the “Darwin Awards”. There is an inherent amount of risk to any activity in life. We choose to deal with that risk. Have you ever smoked a cigarette? Maybe you are a qualifier too.