Texas Mask Mandate

L4Dawg

All-American
Oct 27, 2016
10,682
7,403
113
Basically right now wearing a mask is an audition for the Darwin Awards. If you wear one, you don't qualify. The trouble is, those that don't wear one can take out those that do.
 

dog12

Senior
Sep 15, 2016
1,950
592
113
The thing is there really isn't any medical condition that would prevent you from wearing a mask.


That's simply your opinion . . . which has no effect on the Executive Order set forth in Virginia.

The exceptions to wearing a mask in the Executive Order fail to specifically define the "health conditions that prohibit wearing a face covering."

Thus, the Executive Order is very broad and vague concerning such "health conditions."

I think the Governor of Virginia intentionally wrote this broad/vague language into the Executive Order so that each person having the "health condition" could decide for himself/herself.

Otherwise, what would the Governor do? Provide a list of all "health conditions" that fall under the mask-wearing exception? Ha ha, that's funny.
 

dog12

Senior
Sep 15, 2016
1,950
592
113
Dog12 appears to think that even wearing a mask at all is unreasonable.


I think it's unreasonable for ME to wear a mask based upon the fact that I'm never within 6 feet of any other human being for more than a few seconds . . . except for my wife and daughter.

The only times I'm away from the house are: going to the grocery store (rare), going to Home Depot (lately, very often) and going to my daughter's lacrosse practices (twice/week).

At each of those instances, I am never within 6 feet of any other human being for more than a few seconds.

Thus, there's no reason for ME to wear a mask.


That being said . . . I certainly realize that everybody is different and has different circumstances in their lives.

Thus, I leave the choice of whether to wear a mask to each individual.

I certainly don't mind if other people wear masks.

Via shaming and throwing hissy fits, it is only the mask-wearers that are trying to control the non-wearers actions.

The non-wearers are not trying to force the mask-wearers to NOT wear mask . . . because we don't give a 17 whether a person wears a mask.
 

dog12

Senior
Sep 15, 2016
1,950
592
113
So you are equating a 50 cent mask with a full hazmat suite? That's just stupid, plain out old dumbass stupid.


If you seriously think that in my above post I'm equating a mask with a full hazmat suite, then there's nothing I can do for you.
 
Last edited:

mount lefroy

Redshirt
Feb 10, 2013
2,501
0
36
Would wearing a full hazmat suit help to slow the spread even more than wearing a mask? If so, then why don't we require full hazmat suits?

My point is this: which safety precautions are reasonable? That's what the debate is about.

In my opinion, requiring people to wear a mask is unreasonable.

Clearly, based upon all the bitching and moaning by mask-wearers, lots of people agree with me and choose not to wear a mask.

If you were having surgery, would you prefer the surgical staff to wear a mask?
 

dog12

Senior
Sep 15, 2016
1,950
592
113
As for masks, I dont like wearing one, but do when its advisable and it just isnt difficult to do it. I went with my oldest kid to buy shoes yesterday and we spent 45min in a small running shop getting her set up with good shoes. We had to wear masks because the store requires it. It was quite simple and successful. I cant imagine how anyone could go thru that event and declare it to be unreasonable.


Yep.

If I were ever under those circumstances, then maybe I would wear a mask too. Who knows?

It's completely your choice as to whether to wear a mask based upon your circumstances . . . and I fully support that.
 

HailStout

Heisman
Jan 4, 2020
5,560
15,712
113
I really don’t understand this either. My end stage COPD patients are required to wear masks in our office just like everyone else and have zero issue doing so. It is not putting them in danger otherwise we would not require it.
 

Dog316

Redshirt
Aug 21, 2012
404
2
18
Would wearing a full hazmat suit help to slow the spread even more than wearing a mask? If so, then why don't we require full hazmat suits?

My point is this: which safety precautions are reasonable? That's what the debate is about.

In my opinion, requiring people to wear a mask is unreasonable.

Clearly, based upon all the bitching and moaning by mask-wearers, lots of people agree with me and choose not to wear a mask.


————

Good grief, if wearing a mask can protect others from you should you be a symptomatic you should as a decent human being wear a mask. It is good to occasionally think about someone other than yourself.
 
Last edited:

dog12

Senior
Sep 15, 2016
1,950
592
113
————

Good grief, if wearing a mask can protect others from you should you be a symptomatic you should as a decent human being wear a mask. It is good to occasionally think about someone other than yourself.


This is a great example of the "bitching and moaning" and attempted shaming that is all too-common among mask-wearers.
 
Aug 22, 2012
1,076
299
83
Basically right now wearing a mask is an audition for the Darwin Awards. If you wear one, you don't qualify. The trouble is, those that don't wear one can take out those that do.

Not wearing a mask, that may or may not help, in response to a disease that over 99% of people who contract survive is not exactly social Darwinism. Also, I bet you would argue that protesting in the freeway is necessary. #joke
 

SheltonChoked

Redshirt
Feb 27, 2008
1,786
0
0
Are you saying that performing surgery is the equivalent of running to the grocery store to buy a loaf of bread?

Based on the way we understand COVID is transmitted, how few virus particles are required for infection, and how long the virus is viable inside, Yes.

You should know by now that COVID infects the lungs.

And that it needs about 1,000 virus particles to infect someone.

What you do not know is how high risk it is to be inside with someone that is infected. NIOSH had studies this for a while now, and there are industries created around removing droplets from fluids. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/ae...4w9VM2HShaEpeYRRzgDf_Xj2hL_trCnAThJBorHVEsZ30

TL;DR.

One sneeze from an asymptomatic infected person can longer inside a building (I.e., Home Depot, or Kroger) for days...
 

L4Dawg

All-American
Oct 27, 2016
10,682
7,403
113
Not wearing a mask, that may or may not help, in response to a disease that over 99% of people who contract survive is not exactly social Darwinism. Also, I bet you would argue that protesting in the freeway is necessary. #joke
How much did you bet? Because you lost it. There is no may or may not about masks. You people are letting emotions get in the way of science. Also, I take it you aren't familiar with the Darwin Awards. Not everyone that does something stupid manages to kill themselves or otherwise remove themselves from the gene pool. But if you do something stupid and do, you qualify. Not wearing a mask inside in public is doing something stupid.
 
Last edited:

L4Dawg

All-American
Oct 27, 2016
10,682
7,403
113
This is a great example of the "bitching and moaning" and attempted shaming that is all too-common among mask-wearers.
LOL, It was actually an attempt to appeal to the same thing you are, emotion. You have obviously rejected the science.
 

rem101

Sophomore
Jan 22, 2008
3,187
139
63
What if you've already had the virus and recovered? If you have the antibodies...isn't it general consensus you can no longer contract it again, therefore you won't be able to spread it? I would think there's no reason for that person to wear a mask.

Not referring to myself, though part of me wishes I was since I'm still alive to type this. The other part of me wishes I don't have to go through contracting it.
 
Aug 22, 2012
1,076
299
83
How much did you bet? Because you lost it. There is no may or may not about masks. You people are letting emotions get in the way of science. Also, I take it you aren't familiar with the Darwin Awards. Not everyone that does something stupid manages to kill themselves or otherwise remove themselves from the gene pool. But if you do something stupid and do, you qualify. Not wearing a mask inside in public is doing something stupid.

The rules of your made up game are ridiculous. Using your logic, anyone that chooses to drive a car or not get the yearly flu shot qualifies for the “Darwin Awards”. There is an inherent amount of risk to any activity in life. We choose to deal with that risk. Have you ever smoked a cigarette? Maybe you are a qualifier too.
 

L4Dawg

All-American
Oct 27, 2016
10,682
7,403
113
That's simply your opinion . . . which has no effect on the Executive Order set forth in Virginia.

The exceptions to wearing a mask in the Executive Order fail to specifically define the "health conditions that prohibit wearing a face covering."

Thus, the Executive Order is very broad and vague concerning such "health conditions."

I think the Governor of Virginia intentionally wrote this broad/vague language into the Executive Order so that each person having the "health condition" could decide for himself/herself.

Otherwise, what would the Governor do? Provide a list of all "health conditions" that fall under the mask-wearing exception? Ha ha, that's funny.
The vast majority of medical opinion says there are no real contraidications to wearing a mask.
 

RocketDawg

All-Conference
Oct 21, 2011
19,108
2,154
113
What if you've already had the virus and recovered? If you have the antibodies...isn't it general consensus you can no longer contract it again, therefore you won't be able to spread it? I would think there's no reason for that person to wear a mask.

Not referring to myself, though part of me wishes I was since I'm still alive to type this. The other part of me wishes I don't have to go through contracting it.

I don't know what today's thinking is, but there was some word a couple weeks ago that said you could get the disease more than once.
 

RocketDawg

All-Conference
Oct 21, 2011
19,108
2,154
113
Yes, I agree.

I feel a lot safer if the person signing me in to vote wears a mask, since it's fairly close contact. And he/she should sanitize their hands every time they handle someone's ID. Here, they take your driver's license and run it through a scanner to establish your eligibility to vote, and to vote in that precinct.
 

SheltonChoked

Redshirt
Feb 27, 2008
1,786
0
0
Then, in my opinion, you are unreasonable.

Also, in light of your answer, I can now better understand why you write the statements contained in your posts.


An aside: are you and L4 the same person?
And in the opinion of those that understand germ theory and actively work in Stokes Law, You are an idiot.

It's one thing to not know better. You have been told.

You clearly just don't care about other people. Including your own family.
 

L4Dawg

All-American
Oct 27, 2016
10,682
7,403
113
The rules of your made up game are ridiculous. Using your logic, anyone that chooses to drive a car or not get the yearly flu shot qualifies for the “Darwin Awards”. There is an inherent amount of risk to any activity in life. We choose to deal with that risk. Have you ever smoked a cigarette? Maybe you are a qualifier too.
Never smoked in my life. I watched a grandfather who lived with us cough his lungs up with emphysema. Driving car only qualifies you for a Darwin if you are doing something stupid in it. Normal driving no, driving 110mph on I55, yes. Not getting a flu shot and right now not wearing a mask is just dumb stupid. If your not wearing a mask only affected you I wouldn't care. Kill yourself. But that isn't how it works. it affects everyone around you.
 
Last edited: