I couldn’t agree more with your stated reasons as to why the Catholic schools have seen growth.They get a lot from Darien, Willowbrook, Woodridge, Lemont, Palos, Orland too. Covid and, for lack of a better term, “wokeness” helped them and other Catholic schools pull a lot of kids from the near western burbs. I had a friend who told me his daughter wasn’t going to Lyons Township because “the school board was confused over who belonged in the women’s restroom”. Honestly, they’ve got a decent footprint in Mt. Greenwood/Beverly too. Not on the same level as the other neighborhood schools, but it used to be unheard of for kids from that area to go to StL a decade ago.
Any west suburban numbers?
SF/Naz/Montini/IC
I remember when Loyola went coed back in the early 90s, they said their approach was going to be to let the market decide. I don't know if that has changed or not since then.Serious question for the co-ed catholic schools. (Not trying to start an argument here).
For admissions, do schools have a separate target for boys and girls. For example if you have 400 spots, do you reserve 200 for boys and 200 for girls or just admit the best 400 applicants.
That rash you speak of has been present for many years. Catholic schools on the north side and in the northern suburbs have been closing and merging and experiencing enrollment declines for decades.Loyola 685
DePaul 640
Side note, there’s been a rash of Catholic grade school closings up on the northside of Chicago. Can’t blame folks leaving the city, but not sure how good this is for the likes of Loyola, ND, Pats, etc. Tuition isn’t cheap.
Saint Francis had their entrance exam Saturday December 6, 2025 at 8:00am.High schools in the Joliet Diocese may have a different test day.
Thanks for the clarification. Not too long ago, the Chicago Archdiocesan schools had theirs on the second Saturday of January and recently switched to the first Saturday of December. Apparently, both Joliet and Chicago do theirs on the same day now.Saint Francis had their entrance exam Saturday December 6, 2025 at 8:00am.
Joliet Diocese usually has it the first Sat in December.
Intentional?Thanks for the clarification. Not too long ago, the Chicago Archdiocesan schools had theirs on the second Saturday of January and recently switched to the first Saturday of December. Apparently, both Joliet and Chicago do theirs on the same day now.
Perhaps. Intentional or not, the result is it keeps kids in the near west/southwest burbs from testing/applying at two different schools and comparing financial aid offers.Intentional?
Naz is Chicago DioceseHigh schools in the Joliet Diocese may have a different test day.
I don't. They usually keep it close to the vest. Its usually a good class if they hit 300 on test day. I think they only take 200-220.Do you know how their numbers were?
I think 200 would be upper limit. 180-200 would be more the range.I don't. They usually keep it close to the vest. Its usually a good class if they hit 300 on test day. I think they only take 200-220.
150 test, how many enroll?In the end, Rita had around 150, I believe. I think 12 - 15 more are expected to take the test Dec. 13th.
Interestingly, I think admin wants around that 150 - 160 number each year--they're comfortable with that. News to me.
From what I know, the Admin at Rita is comfortable with that 150 - 160 number because in the end, they get about 140 - 45 to actually enroll.150 test, how many enroll?
Nice hit rate...From what I know, the Admin at Rita is comfortable with that 150 - 160 number because in the end, they get about 140 - 45 to actually enroll.
Not to mention, they produce people knowledgeable and invested in their faith, to go out and impact an increasingly godless world.I know a lot of people get a good laugh of this yearly thread but to those of us that attended a CCL school, we know how important it is. Financial struggles at these schools are a real problem. You don't get paid money from the IHSA for winning State Titles. You hope athletic success can turn into some extra students each year. Especially for all boys schools like MC, SR and BR.....we are the 3! We need bodies in those seats and tuitions to be paid. I know many think the entire MC football team is going for free, they aren't!! We would be closed if we did. Many kids in the school come from families that struggle financially and they get Aid through agencies that pay MC. Yes there are some donations from donors, I won't insult anyones intelligence but they are all not getting free rides! We fundraise, we get hold events, we beg and borrow to keep the doors open. So yeah I do take interest in these numbers because I want to see all CCL schools succeed so we can keep going.
This is not snark, but a genuine question. I have seen a lot of people say this or something to the same effect over the years. This seems contrary to recent news we've seen of a few different programs in the CCL investing big money into athletic facilities. Are these facilities being built on private donations specifically for the purpose of building? Or where is this money coming from if the schools are barely scraping by?I know a lot of people get a good laugh of this yearly thread but to those of us that attended a CCL school, we know how important it is. Financial struggles at these schools are a real problem. You don't get paid money from the IHSA for winning State Titles. You hope athletic success can turn into some extra students each year. Especially for all boys schools like MC, SR and BR.....we are the 3! We need bodies in those seats and tuitions to be paid. I know many think the entire MC football team is going for free, they aren't!! We would be closed if we did. Many kids in the school come from families that struggle financially and they get Aid through agencies that pay MC. Yes there are some donations from donors, I won't insult anyones intelligence but they are all not getting free rides! We fundraise, we get hold events, we beg and borrow to keep the doors open. So yeah I do take interest in these numbers because I want to see all CCL schools succeed so we can keep going.
In general these types of investments are done because of large capital improvement campaigns, some large estate trust or large individual donation. I do not understand this "Are these facilities being built on private donations specifically for the purpose of building?" Improving athletics facilities is not just a help to athletics, it benefits the school overall. More space for all different activities. A new gym/fieldhouse/etc can ease space constraints considerably for a multitude of activities. And for years their facilities have been lagging behind public schools (for the most part), obviously that has changed in the last decade.This is not snark, but a genuine question. I have seen a lot of people say this or something to the same effect over the years. This seems contrary to recent news we've seen of a few different programs in the CCL investing big money into athletic facilities. Are these facilities being built on private donations specifically for the purpose of building? Or where is this money coming from if the schools are barely scraping by?
MC Football Field was funded from donors, one of them with construction hook ups. @Topiarydan1 could tell you more about this but Br. Rice fundraised for MANY years to get the new baseball field. I saw signs there for years about th upcoming field and it took awhile. Looks great, but it took awhile. If I go into MC and say here is 1 million dollars get a turf infield for baseball, MC will oblige. If I came in and said here is 1 million for the school and the betterment of it and it's updates and upkeep an MC spent it on a turf infield and word got out all hell would break loose.This is not snark, but a genuine question. I have seen a lot of people say this or something to the same effect over the years. This seems contrary to recent news we've seen of a few different programs in the CCL investing big money into athletic facilities. Are these facilities being built on private donations specifically for the purpose of building? Or where is this money coming from if the schools are barely scraping by?
I think this is a bit of a selection bias going on here. The examples are the ones who have overcome or at least mitigated the challenge, but that doesn't erase that it's there. You don't see ones who lose the struggle (they've lost individual programs they can't support or close down altogether)This is not snark, but a genuine question. I have seen a lot of people say this or something to the same effect over the years. This seems contrary to recent news we've seen of a few different programs in the CCL investing big money into athletic facilities. Are these facilities being built on private donations specifically for the purpose of building? Or where is this money coming from if the schools are barely scraping by?
Sorry meant to say for the purpose of building athletic facilities. For example a donor says here is 1 million but it can only go to X project. Similar to what McCaravan said.In general these types of investments are done because of large capital improvement campaigns, some large estate trust or large individual donation. I do not understand this "Are these facilities being built on private donations specifically for the purpose of building?" Improving athletics facilities is not just a help to athletics, it benefits the school overall. More space for all different activities. A new gym/fieldhouse/etc can ease space constraints considerably for a multitude of activities. And for years their facilities have been lagging behind public schools (for the most part), obviously that has changed in the last decade.
got itSorry meant to say for the purpose of building athletic facilities. For example a donor says here is 1 million but it can only go to X project. Similar to what McCaravan said.
Not to mention, they produce people knowledgeable and invested in their faith, to go out and impact an increasingly godless world.
These facilities provide far more than benefits to the school itself—they serve as valuable resources for the surrounding communities and neighborhoods. Programs such as long-standing day camps (LA has hosted one for over 50 years), sports camps, swimming lessons, summer school for elementary students, theatre programs, and facility rentals—often offered at little or no cost—create meaningful opportunities for local families.In general these types of investments are done because of large capital improvement campaigns, some large estate trust or large individual donation. I do not understand this "Are these facilities being built on private donations specifically for the purpose of building?" Improving athletics facilities is not just a help to athletics, it benefits the school overall. More space for all different activities. A new gym/fieldhouse/etc can ease space constraints considerably for a multitude of activities. And for years their facilities have been lagging behind public schools (for the most part), obviously that has changed in the last decade.
I know, I said they benefit more than just athletics.These facilities provide far more than benefits to the school itself—they serve as valuable resources for the surrounding communities and neighborhoods. Programs such as long-standing day camps (LA has hosted one for over 50 years), sports camps, swimming lessons, summer school for elementary students, theatre programs, and facility rentals—often offered at little or no cost—create meaningful opportunities for local families.
During the summer months, many Catholic high schools are bustling with activity, hosting a wide range of programs and events. Throughout the academic year, these schools also welcome grade school students for activities ranging from athletic competitions and science fairs to orchestra performances.
By opening their doors in this way, schools strengthen community ties, provide enriching experiences for local residents, and inspire younger students to consider enrollment in the future.
I know you said that - I was highlighting the community benefitsI know, I said they benefit more than just athletics.