Take PJ situation at Face Value

Wildcatfan66

Heisman
Mar 27, 2007
9,853
12,512
113
This is just my opinion. I would not try to read into anything that has been said.
Yesterday, Cal said there is no significant damage to PJ's foot and that PJ wants to play. They were sending him to a specialist to be completely sure. I think shortly thereafter they also decided that PJ wasn't going to play in this Abilene Game. Why would you play him if you know he could rest that foot and you will still win without him? He's not needed for this game.

Once it was decided he wasn't going to play, the best way to immobilize that foot and keep anything further from happening is a hard cast. So, that's what they did.

So today, when it is said that he's "out for today's game" I would take that at face value. So, I'm assuming he will return for Saturday's game. And yes, a hard cast can be removed after a short time.

I don't think it is wise to read anything further into any of this.

I agree. There is just so much more we don't know. Sounds like no major structural damage. But maybe his pain got worse this week. Maybe the specialist said the fastest way to recover was a hard cast for 48 hours. My guess is the specialist recommended the cast and some rest if possible. I appreciate that Calipari is always looking out for the best for his players. Another coach might have played him anyway.

For us fans, we are upset because any chance of get to the FF or a NC goes out the window without PJ. But put yourself in PJ's shoes (literally). Tens of millions of dollars, his future NBA career, etc are at stake. It hurts us all, but all we can do is hope he is able to play Saturday or at least by next weekend.
 

know1

Heisman
Dec 8, 2002
12,855
14,925
0
But you can't take the situation at face value because Cal/UK are clearly not telling us everything.

And when you think about the reasons why they would do that, the conclusions aren't good (that it's worse than they want to publicize).
 

Cats192

Heisman
Apr 22, 2011
14,904
17,816
93
My other thought in regards to Saturday is this.

Why come down separately if he’s for sure going to sit? I get traveling with the team to support them and cheer them on. But why I take a separate flight or bus if you’re for sure ruled out?

It’s possible he doesn’t play Saturday, but I also don’t think it’s definite he is out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ukfan041

BlueBlood66_rivals34314

All-Conference
Aug 2, 2012
3,469
1,233
0
That guy is speculating. He doesn't know the actual extent of this injury.
It's clearly not a serious injury. If it were, we'd ALL know when it happened in that game last Saturday, but we don't know. People have scoured the tape trying to figure it out and couldn't even find when it happened. If it were a season ending sprain, he'd have gone down in that game and wouldn't have returned. This is likely a mild sprained foot. If we were playing Duke or Tennessee tonight, he'd wrap the thing and play. As far as 100% goes, I'd be willing to bet 1/3 or more college basketball players are less than 100% this time of year. But they're gonna play and they will be fine. Get that adrenaline flowing and you play.

Saying he would play tonight if it were Duke or Tenn is speculation as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Obadiah Plainman

Cal-4-Three

All-Conference
Apr 2, 2011
1,591
1,844
0
Most of the overreactions come from the hard cast not just him not playing. I don't think I've seen a hard cast put on for temporary reasons. I just worry it's worse than they are saying and that they don't want to hurt his draft stock.
 
  • Like
Reactions: St.PatterSoN-54-

STL_Cat

Heisman
Dec 4, 2011
65,075
58,099
98
They keep using the word "precautionary", and Cal said he might go before. My uneducated guess is he could/would go if we really needed him in a big game tonight. But we don't, so rest him an extra day.

The sitting tonight doesn’t bother me. I fully expected that and said yesterday I expect he’ll sit Thursday’s game and play this weekend. Yes I will admit, I’m one of those that’s not as confident after finding out about the cast. I hope I’m just paranoid.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ukfan041

March 22

All-Conference
Mar 22, 2007
1,142
1,725
0
This is just my opinion. I would not try to read into anything that has been said.
Yesterday, Cal said there is no significant damage to PJ's foot and that PJ wants to play. They were sending him to a specialist to be completely sure. I think shortly thereafter they also decided that PJ wasn't going to play in this Abilene Game. Why would you play him if you know he could rest that foot and you will still win without him? He's not needed for this game.

Once it was decided he wasn't going to play, the best way to immobilize that foot and keep anything further from happening is a hard cast. So, that's what they did.


Agree. Don’t think a “hard cast” is a big deal in of itself. This is not a casual, random Joe situation. To give him the best chance of healing fast in a dire situation (the tournament], the highest level of service is being utilized even though it may have marginal impact. Rightfully so! Might be cut off tomorrow, who knows.
 
Last edited:

ImUTGagain

All-Conference
Sep 14, 2010
2,337
3,102
0
This is just my opinion. I would not try to read into anything that has been said.
Yesterday, Cal said there is no significant damage to PJ's foot and that PJ wants to play. They were sending him to a specialist to be completely sure. I think shortly thereafter they also decided that PJ wasn't going to play in this Abilene Game. Why would you play him if you know he could rest that foot and you will still win without him? He's not needed for this game.

Once it was decided he wasn't going to play, the best way to immobilize that foot and keep anything further from happening is a hard cast. So, that's what they did.

So today, when it is said that he's "out for today's game" I would take that at face value. So, I'm assuming he will return for Saturday's game. And yes, a hard cast can be removed after a short time.

I don't think it is wise to read anything further into any of this.

Well said and thank you for being a good mod. Thanks others could learn a thing or two from you

But by reading your post, it sounds like you know most the posts on here are **** and we have a large community of fake fans or trolls. Why not clean this place up some? Ban some these fools. This site is hard to visit sometimes bc of the absolute **** you gotta Wade thru just to read a decent post of UK basketball. Why is that?
 

SemperFiCat

Heisman
Mar 2, 2009
14,566
30,005
0
The sitting tonight doesn’t bother me. I fully expected that and said yesterday I expect he’ll sit Thursday’s game and play this weekend. Yes I will admit, I’m one of those that’s not as confident after finding out about the cast. I hope I’m just paranoid.
I hear ya, but why wouldn't you put your best player in a boot for precautionary measures? It's tournament time, and they want to give him anything to heal as quickly as possible. Again, my uneducated guess.
 

STL_Cat

Heisman
Dec 4, 2011
65,075
58,099
98
I hear ya, but why wouldn't you put your best player in a boot for precautionary measures? It's tournament time, and they want to give him anything to heal as quickly as possible. Again, my uneducated guess.

Oh man I’m with you on the boot. I expected him to wear the boot and sit out tonight. The decision to change the boot to a cast is what is scaring me.
 
Apr 11, 2009
1,471
1,309
0
I understand the sentiment BUT we are now at 1-and-done. You do not risk losing or take an opponent that "lightly." If we lose and find that they were gambling on getting PJ another day?!?!?! That would turn out to be an AWFUL decision. Dress him, don't start him but have him available if the wheels start falling off.

This decision tells me that things are worse than they are telling us. I hope I am wrong.
That's kinda what worries me. I hope the OP is correct in his assumption, but I just don't see resting a player capable of playing in the tournament. 2 seeds have been defeated by 15 seeds a number of times in the past. In fact, just last year a 1 seed lost to a 16. No one is safe in the tournament, especially without their best player.
 

KyFaninNC

Heisman
Mar 14, 2005
195,719
24,518
0
This is just my opinion. I would not try to read into anything that has been said.
Yesterday, Cal said there is no significant damage to PJ's foot and that PJ wants to play. They were sending him to a specialist to be completely sure. I think shortly thereafter they also decided that PJ wasn't going to play in this Abilene Game. Why would you play him if you know he could rest that foot and you will still win without him? He's not needed for this game.

Once it was decided he wasn't going to play, the best way to immobilize that foot and keep anything further from happening is a hard cast. So, that's what they did.

So today, when it is said that he's "out for today's game" I would take that at face value. So, I'm assuming he will return for Saturday's game. And yes, a hard cast can be removed after a short time.

I don't think it is wise to read anything further into any of this.
We are NOT 100% guaranteed a win tonight. There is no such thing. Ask UVA about that.
 

jdoub11

Senior
Aug 6, 2009
387
613
93
Well at least the team we play tonight suspended 3 of there players about a month or two ago
 

Son_Of_Saul

Heisman
Dec 7, 2007
45,488
99,971
113
But you can't take the situation at face value because Cal/UK are clearly not telling us everything.

And when you think about the reasons why they would do that, the conclusions aren't good (that it's worse than they want to publicize).

Not buying it.

Cal never said "we expect him to play" in regards to WCS in '14 or Vanderbilt in '18.
 

Son_Of_Saul

Heisman
Dec 7, 2007
45,488
99,971
113
That's kinda what worries me. I hope the OP is correct in his assumption, but I just don't see resting a player capable of playing in the tournament. 2 seeds have been defeated by 15 seeds a number of times in the past. In fact, just last year a 1 seed lost to a 16. No one is safe in the tournament, especially without their best player.




Cal's "we expect him to play" might have more to do with the coaches "expecting" the team to advance past the first weekend without PJ, and then getting him back next weekend.
 

Son_Of_Saul

Heisman
Dec 7, 2007
45,488
99,971
113
Most of the overreactions come from the hard cast not just him not playing. I don't think I've seen a hard cast put on for temporary reasons. I just worry it's worse than they are saying and that they don't want to hurt his draft stock.

That would be a first though.

Comparing PJ to J Vando last year is not sufficient because Vanderbilt was actually legitimately hurt.

Cal also never said "we expect him to play" in regards to JV's tournament chances.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cal-4-Three

westerncat

Heisman
Feb 19, 2012
15,923
20,891
0
I think Washington will play this Saturday. Man there are a lot of "sky is falling " fans on this board.
 

Ineverplayedthegame

All-Conference
Aug 12, 2005
5,139
4,960
0
I know every bit as much as everyone else on this board.
I don’t want it to be the case. I know that PJ surely doesn’t want it to be the case. I hope I am wrong. But it doesn’t change that stress fractures are often initially diagnosed as ankle sprains.
 

Cal-4-Three

All-Conference
Apr 2, 2011
1,591
1,844
0
I know every bit as much as everyone else on this board.
I don’t want it to be the case. I know that PJ surely doesn’t want it to be the case. I hope I am wrong. But it doesn’t change that stress fractures are often initially diagnosed as ankle sprains.

They said the MRI was negative though...
 
Sep 13, 2003
23,905
33,655
0
I know every bit as much as everyone else on this board.
I don’t want it to be the case. I know that PJ surely doesn’t want it to be the case. I hope I am wrong. But it doesn’t change that stress fractures are often initially diagnosed as ankle sprains.

Not after an MRI read by a specialist.

However, that doesn't mean Cal is telling the public the whole truth either. PJ's injury could be worse than is being told, but how does that benefit PJ?

The NBA teams are going to examine PJ extensively now whether he plays or not. So, I don't see any benefit for PJ and Cal not coming clean with how long he will be out from this point forward.

This makes me think that PJ will at some point return if we can keep winning until then.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ukfan041

83Cat_rivals79182

All-Conference
Mar 31, 2009
6,280
1,779
65
The question begs : Does Cal roll the dice Saturday too and give PJ an additional week to recover? Past precedent with Reid (for the Florida game) suggests he does . Risky to say the least , but I think we can beat Wofford/ SH winner w/o PJ
Let's just hope for huge coming out games from EJ and Nick. If the light goes on with EJ and he starts hitting we can still be GREAT! Then if we get PJ back, we will be all the stronger for it. Reid might also find a new self through this. Cal can make some tweaks and coach us through this!
 
Jul 11, 2007
27,222
34,299
0
I'm usually a supreme optimist, but I'm in the camp that we've possibly (likely?) seen the last of PJ in a UK uniform. I hate it, but I'll be pleasantly surprised if that's not the case. Cal always errs on the side of player safety, so if there's any doubt, he will not play. Get better soon, big fella.
 

kybassfan

Heisman
Jul 1, 2005
20,032
16,368
113
I'm not normally a gloom and doom fan, but I don't know that UK has earned the benefit of the doubt on injuries. They don't have to share information at all, but it always seems that injuries are worse than they let on and/or take longer to heal than they report.

Thing is, UK does not owe us a single shred of information. Not one single word. Further, injuries are unpredictable and player reactions to injury is even more chaotic. There is no benefit of the doubt or false expectation. A player plays if and when he plays. If you expect to know more or expect some insight into a player’s discussion with the medical staff or coaches, that’s on you. The school, program, staff or player owe us nothing.

We’ll PJ when we see him. Casts can be used for many things. Compliance for one. Whether it is needed long term or short term, only his doc can guess. That individual is bound by law not to discuss it without specific permission. End of story. That is what we know. That is all we are entitled to know. Any other expectation is contrived and utterly without merit.
 

Wildcats1st

Heisman
Sep 16, 2017
18,949
28,911
0
This is just my opinion. I would not try to read into anything that has been said.
Yesterday, Cal said there is no significant damage to PJ's foot and that PJ wants to play. They were sending him to a specialist to be completely sure. I think shortly thereafter they also decided that PJ wasn't going to play in this Abilene Game. Why would you play him if you know he could rest that foot and you will still win without him? He's not needed for this game.

Once it was decided he wasn't going to play, the best way to immobilize that foot and keep anything further from happening is a hard cast. So, that's what they did.

So today, when it is said that he's "out for today's game" I would take that at face value. So, I'm assuming he will return for Saturday's game. And yes, a hard cast can be removed after a short time.

I don't think it is wise to read anything further into any of this.

You don’t fully immobilize a guy then play him 2 days later. The chances of serious injury increase 10 fold. Pj will need pt before he plays again. The only reason for a hard cast is serious injury bc even after a couple days the muscle will begin to atrophy once that happens the risk is much higher than just playing on it.
 

RobynL

Junior
Apr 9, 2007
402
285
0
This is just my opinion. I would not try to read into anything that has been said.
Yesterday, Cal said there is no significant damage to PJ's foot and that PJ wants to play. They were sending him to a specialist to be completely sure. I think shortly thereafter they also decided that PJ wasn't going to play in this Abilene Game. Why would you play him if you know he could rest that foot and you will still win without him? He's not needed for this game.

Once it was decided he wasn't going to play, the best way to immobilize that foot and keep anything further from happening is a hard cast. So, that's what they did.

So today, when it is said that he's "out for today's game" I would take that at face value. So, I'm assuming he will return for Saturday's game. And yes, a hard cast can be removed after a short time.

I don't think it is wise to read anything further into any of this.
Exactly this!
 

Elliott Tim

All-American
Dec 10, 2005
10,122
6,290
0
This is just my opinion. I would not try to read into anything that has been said.
Yesterday, Cal said there is no significant damage to PJ's foot and that PJ wants to play. They were sending him to a specialist to be completely sure. I think shortly thereafter they also decided that PJ wasn't going to play in this Abilene Game. Why would you play him if you know he could rest that foot and you will still win without him? He's not needed for this game.

Once it was decided he wasn't going to play, the best way to immobilize that foot and keep anything further from happening is a hard cast. So, that's what they did.

So today, when it is said that he's "out for today's game" I would take that at face value. So, I'm assuming he will return for Saturday's game. And yes, a hard cast can be removed after a short time.

I don't think it is wise to read anything further into any of this.
Agree. I don't want the sky to fall.
 

Cats192

Heisman
Apr 22, 2011
14,904
17,816
93
You don’t fully immobilize a guy then play him 2 days later. The chances of serious injury increase 10 fold. Pj will need pt before he plays again. The only reason for a hard cast is serious injury bc even after a couple days the muscle will begin to atrophy once that happens the risk is much higher than just playing on it.

You’re not going to have significant muscle loss in 24 to 48 hours.
 

Ky_Bred_Cat

All-Conference
Dec 28, 2014
2,179
4,055
113
This very well may be true, though I would suspect the hard cast decision was made with an awareness that he is out Saturday.
While you can remove at any point, the recovery hopes from complete immobilization usually involve longer than a two-day span.

I agree with this assessment. PJ's likely out till next week.