It’s giving up a home game, that’s just a fact.
You don’t give up home games against teams likely to have a top 30 NET. Ideally, you give up a home game in favor of neutral court against a team with a lower NET, which could potentially result in the game becoming a quadrant better in terms of W/L. It’s not that complicated.
I think you have it backwards......a neutral win carries more weight than any home win. It allows for more flexibility on how good or not as good is your opponent.
Anyone who is in the Top 50 range as a neutral, qualifies as a Q1 win. If you have a Q2 win at the RAC because MSU is not as good next year, that win is better if it's a neutral site (not really neutral with MSG so close) game.
MSU would have to be in the Top 30 for that to qualify as a Q1 win if the game is at the RAC.
If the game is neutral, the opponent only needs to be in the Top 50.
If the game is away, the team needs to be in the Top 75.
I don't necessarily care about how the NET is calculated, it is badly structured.....BUT common sense should tell you that the path to making your NCAA resume the strongest, is by securing Q1 wins.
This is a no-brainer IMO....you don't want to play someone outside of the Top 50 on a neutral, if you can avoid doing so. The game should be at worse a Q2 win and hopefully a Q1 win.
Track your college basketball team's Quad 1 wins and their record in the other three quads. An important piece of their tournament resume.
bracketresearch.com