Sullivan to Iowa

Aug 31, 2003
15,073
506
113
We aren’t sure, so it is really semantics on how Braun delivered the message. Braun already said he wished Sully had stayed, so I doubt he said, we are going in another direction, hope you elect to stay as a second or even third stringer.

I think it is far more plausible that Sully asked if he was the Starter and Braun said it’s still an open competition. Sully decided to explore other opportunities when he didn’t like what he heard and wasn’t guaranteed the starter role.
Some posters seem pretty insistent that Sully was actually told that Lausch jumped him.
 

phatcat_rivals223240

All-Conference
Nov 5, 2001
18,977
1,130
113
Sully asked if he was the Starter and Braun said it’s still an open competition.
It's another Kyle McCord thing. The difference is, McCord was already competing with two 4 stars on the roster and a new 5 star recruit incoming. Then Day threw a grenade in the water after McCord left, and added two other transfers.

Like Sullivan, McCord transferred to a lesser program.
 
Aug 31, 2003
15,073
506
113
I don’t know. What we can be fairly certain of is that Braun did not tell Sully in some form that he was guaranteed to start.
If Braun had told Sully that he was looking in the Portal but that Sully would have a chance to compete for the top spot with whoever is brought in, I'm not sure that by itself would be enough to drive Sully off.
 

Kiteboarder

Freshman
Mar 13, 2002
1,826
95
38
High K guys have almost (almost)always been high velo guys — especially starters. But if you think that the only attribute that matters is velo you would be mistaken. Spin rate, release point, tunneling, pitch shape, horizontal and vertical movement all matter. There are plenty of high velo guys with straight fastballs or high walk rates that can’t make it to the minors.

Gonna say something here that will turn out to probably be controversial.

The ABSOLUTE BEST **** I've EVER seen in my life, was from the 2016 version of Jake Arrieta and I've been around longer than almost everybody on this board either playing the game, or now, watching the game.

His ball didn't break until it was about 2 to 3 feet from the hitter. It's easy to hit a breaking ball that breaks 30 feet from the plate. It's impossible to hit a ball that breaks 2 to 3 feet from the plate. Don't believe me? Try it. On his best day, I can say (as a hitter) that he was totally un-hitable. That year I saw many pitches that hit the dirt two feet in front of the plate and the batter was taking a hack at it. Even opposing players were laughing in the dugout at what he was serving. He had stuff I had never seen before, had never seen since, and after 2016, he never had it again. I do not know what physical differences happened that year to him, but for ONE YEAR, he was the greatest pitcher I have ever seen.

There are dozens of guys that were faster, dozens who had more consistent and better location, dozens who could work the zone better, but that year, nobody had what Arrieta had - a pitch that was insanely and totally un-hittable!
 

hawkod

All-Conference
Iowa Swarm member
Apr 5, 2007
518
1,554
93
McNamera is their answer at quarterback.

No need to crap on somebody who played hard for us and got his degree. I’m sure he doesn’t feel that he was owed the job. I’m sure he feels he earned it. Clearly the coaching staff has other priorities. Wish him the best- just not against us.
Iowa fans are afraid Cade may be china doll fragile. If he's healthy he's a solid QB; never really showed anything before he was injured, but everyone knows about the trainwreck that was the Brian Ferentz offense. Decent at Michigan, but how could you not be with that kind of surrounding cast. Don't get me wrong, we're happy to have McNamara....really a charismatic leader....we're just not sure how long he'll last. Sullivan will be at least the 2nd best QB in the room, and with Tim Lester's new offense, who knows?
 

DaCat

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
25,743
2,162
113
I'm baffled that people keep saying he didn't want to compete. He did compete. He was here for Spring practice. He was told they were going with someone else.
He competed until he lost the competition. Then he didn’t want to compete. Got it.
 

xxxbobxxx

Sophomore
Mar 12, 2005
10,813
170
43
Gonna say something here that will turn out to probably be controversial.

The ABSOLUTE BEST **** I've EVER seen in my life, was from the 2016 version of Jake Arrieta and I've been around longer than almost everybody on this board either playing the game, or now, watching the game.

His ball didn't break until it was about 2 to 3 feet from the hitter. It's easy to hit a breaking ball that breaks 30 feet from the plate. It's impossible to hit a ball that breaks 2 to 3 feet from the plate. Don't believe me? Try it. On his best day, I can say (as a hitter) that he was totally un-hitable. That year I saw many pitches that hit the dirt two feet in front of the plate and the batter was taking a hack at it. Even opposing players were laughing in the dugout at what he was serving. He had stuff I had never seen before, had never seen since, and after 2016, he never had it again. I do not know what physical differences happened that year to him, but for ONE YEAR, he was the greatest pitcher I have ever seen.

There are dozens of guys that were faster, dozens who had more consistent and better location, dozens who could work the zone better, but that year, nobody had what Arrieta had - a pitch that was insanely and totally un-hittable!
As a junk ball pitcher, I was always impressed w Mark Buerhle. I could relate. I never topped out over 75 on my best and strongest day. But I could make the ball dance and hit spots. Buerhle’s ‘change up’ with no fastball was a thing of beauty. Also loved the fast style (another ‘gimmick of mine’). He was fun to watch - no time to Play with the phone. He pitched like a machine gun, blink and Sox were up to bat.

Keith Foulke was another of the no fastball but you can’t touch my ‘change up’

That late movement is the secret to poorly hit balls. With a decent D, no strikeouts = low pitch count. And from what I saw, their secret was grip and release, not wrist and twist - so less strain. I blew out my shoulder senior year and elbow was probably not far behind spinning the ball.
 

Gocatsgo2003

All-Conference
Mar 30, 2006
47,224
3,624
78
If Braun had told Sully that he was looking in the Portal but that Sully would have a chance to compete for the top spot with whoever is brought in, I'm not sure that by itself would be enough to drive Sully off.

That’s basically what he told him.
 

PurpleWhiteBoy

Redshirt
Feb 25, 2021
5,303
0
0
Gonna say something here that will turn out to probably be controversial.

The ABSOLUTE BEST **** I've EVER seen in my life, was from the 2016 version of Jake Arrieta and I've been around longer than almost everybody on this board either playing the game, or now, watching the game.

His ball didn't break until it was about 2 to 3 feet from the hitter. It's easy to hit a breaking ball that breaks 30 feet from the plate. It's impossible to hit a ball that breaks 2 to 3 feet from the plate. Don't believe me? Try it. On his best day, I can say (as a hitter) that he was totally un-hitable. That year I saw many pitches that hit the dirt two feet in front of the plate and the batter was taking a hack at it. Even opposing players were laughing in the dugout at what he was serving. He had stuff I had never seen before, had never seen since, and after 2016, he never had it again. I do not know what physical differences happened that year to him, but for ONE YEAR, he was the greatest pitcher I have ever seen.

There are dozens of guys that were faster, dozens who had more consistent and better location, dozens who could work the zone better, but that year, nobody had what Arrieta had - a pitch that was insanely and totally un-hittable!

Did you ever think he might be doctoring the ball? (not being sarcastic, just asking if you thought that might be the case)

Most of the extreme (short-term) outliers in baseball are due to some form of cheating. I guess that sounds pretty cynical. Astros start hitting pitches like they know what's coming... because they literally knew what pitch was coming. Individual players have huge years because they start using PED's. Pitchers have huge years because they are doctoring the ball. Its a long list. And it financially harms the guys who are legitimate.

It often comes right before the cheater signs a big contract. Then he stops doing whatever he was doing. That was probably more the case with PEDs because players knew the enormous benefits and the physical damage, so they juiced, got paid and stopped juicing. Except for the monster egos, like Barry Bonds.

I'm just generalizing. I don't know Jake Arrieta's specific situation. I know he did charity work and people seemed to like him.

But Dwight Gooden might want a word.
 

Gatabowl

Senior
Nov 30, 2022
2,013
491
68
Did you ever think he might be doctoring the ball? (not being sarcastic, just asking if you thought that might be the case)

Most of the extreme (short-term) outliers in baseball are due to some form of cheating. I guess that sounds pretty cynical. Astros start hitting pitches like they know what's coming... because they literally knew what pitch was coming. Individual players have huge years because they start using PED's. Pitchers have huge years because they are doctoring the ball. Its a long list. And it financially harms the guys who are legitimate.

It often comes right before the cheater signs a big contract. Then he stops doing whatever he was doing. That was probably more the case with PEDs because players knew the enormous benefits and the physical damage, so they juiced, got paid and stopped juicing. Except for the monster egos, like Barry Bonds.

I'm just generalizing. I don't know Jake Arrieta's specific situation. I know he did charity work and people seemed to like him.

But Dwight Gooden might want a word.
Spider tack, but everyone was using it because it was legal.
 
Aug 31, 2003
15,073
506
113
It's the only reasonable thing they COULD tell him. They wouldn't lie and say he had the job, and they wouldn't say f*** off.

I like Sully, but if McNamara is healthy, Sullivan is going to sit a lot.
Again, the question is if they told him that Lausch jumped him.
 

xxxbobxxx

Sophomore
Mar 12, 2005
10,813
170
43
Spider tack, but everyone was using it because it was legal.
There were also some natural ways to create adhesives. I followed as it was the opposite of my generation when slick was king. The secret to some great movement on a split finger fastball, knuckle curve, no seam fastball was sliding the ball from the hand without friction velocity loss.

My generation was lost to muscling up and spinning it harder. Adhesive is key. And talcum powder is a nice additive, also tobacco juice, obviously pine tar and such were the poor man approaches - along with some sweat. As life got lazy and rules loosely enforced, the commercial crap took over.

These days I spit in my mask before a dive. I tell my clients using the defog juice that they are supporting companies using kids in China to spit in a jug. But I digress…
 

Kiteboarder

Freshman
Mar 13, 2002
1,826
95
38
Did you ever think he might be doctoring the ball? (not being sarcastic, just asking if you thought that might be the case)
I really never looked for that, and maybe didn't want to believe that he would, so all I have is my belief that something physically was VERY different about his release that year. And I don't know the physics of whether a foreign substance could have the effect I saw. To be honest, I have never seen another pitcher throw the same late-breaking (and fast) $**** that Arrieta did. It was just so noticeably different, but he only had it for one year. It never came back.

Spider tack, but everyone was using it because it was legal.
We had something similar (when I played football around 70 years ago). It was called "Stick em". Was green pasty stuff and worked pretty good until you got dirt on your hands. When that happened, it was more like "slip em" and was a real PITA to get it off your hands.
 

Gocatsgo2003

All-Conference
Mar 30, 2006
47,224
3,624
78
Then Sully leaving for Iowa makes perfect sense.

In a vacuum, yes.

The confusing part is him choosing Iowa, where he’s almost assuredly behind McNamara this year then in another competition for 2025. I thought he would find a MAC program with a clear path to two years as starter.
 

Just Gary

Sophomore
Dec 7, 2007
6,301
147
0
In a vacuum, yes.

The confusing part is him choosing Iowa, where he’s almost assuredly behind McNamara this year then in another competition for 2025. I thought he would find a MAC program with a clear path to two years as starter.
Iowa wanted him badly. There is no guarantee McNamara will be fully recovered from his ACL injury by opening day or whether he can last all season. I can see them floating the idea to Sullivan that he has a chance to be QB1. I can see Sully wanting to stay with a P4 school.

Can Sully switch schools again by next spring?
 

Smolmania

Junior
Nov 4, 2008
1,418
218
63
Did you ever think he might be doctoring the ball? (not being sarcastic, just asking if you thought that might be the case)

Most of the extreme (short-term) outliers in baseball are due to some form of cheating. I guess that sounds pretty cynical. Astros start hitting pitches like they know what's coming... because they literally knew what pitch was coming. Individual players have huge years because they start using PED's. Pitchers have huge years because they are doctoring the ball. Its a long list. And it financially harms the guys who are legitimate.

It often comes right before the cheater signs a big contract. Then he stops doing whatever he was doing. That was probably more the case with PEDs because players knew the enormous benefits and the physical damage, so they juiced, got paid and stopped juicing. Except for the monster egos, like Barry Bonds.

I'm just generalizing. I don't know Jake Arrieta's specific situation. I know he did charity work and people seemed to like him.

But Dwight Gooden might want a word.
Back in '71 or '72 Steve Carlton got traded to the Phillies for Rick Wise (who was slightly younger and who had just thrown a no-hitter). Carlton had started working out with a martial arts-type trainer, Gus Hoefling(sp?). One of the thinks he did was digging his hands into a 40 gallon garbage can full of rice, forcing them to the bottom of the can. Carlton's slider became other-worldly. His '72 season could easily be the best year a starting pitcher ever had. 27-10 (I know, I know, wins and losses aren't a good measure for a pitcher, but for us old folks...) for a team that won 59 games. Lefty made great big league hitters look silly.
 

techtim72

Senior
May 10, 2010
7,300
742
113
Back in '71 or '72 Steve Carlton got traded to the Phillies for Rick Wise (who was slightly younger and who had just thrown a no-hitter). Carlton had started working out with a martial arts-type trainer, Gus Hoefling(sp?). One of the thinks he did was digging his hands into a 40 gallon garbage can full of rice, forcing them to the bottom of the can. Carlton's slider became other-worldly. His '72 season could easily be the best year a starting pitcher ever had. 27-10 (I know, I know, wins and losses aren't a good measure for a pitcher, but for us old folks...) for a team that won 59 games. Lefty made great big league hitters look silly.

Missing why this comment fits the thread topic but I am too lazy to go back thru the history. Anyway, no one including every single Cardinals fan, thought trading Lefty for Wise was a good idea. I don't recall the reason now but Gussie Busch was angry with Lefty and told Bing Devine to trade him. Wise was a very good pitcher but he wasn't a HOF'er.
 

eastbaycat99

Sophomore
Mar 7, 2009
2,528
188
48
Missing why this comment fits the thread topic but I am too lazy to go back thru the history. Anyway, no one including every single Cardinals fan, thought trading Lefty for Wise was a good idea. I don't recall the reason now but Gussie Busch was angry with Lefty and told Bing Devine to trade him. Wise was a very good pitcher but he wasn't a HOF'er.

My brother was friends with the son of the local Episcopal minister who leaked to them that Carlton was getting married at his church. The two of them then waited outside during the ceremony and ambushed Carlton at the end of the aisle as he was leaving, getting his autograph on a baseball.

A hot stove league question from the ‘70’s was which was the best pitching duo on a team in the ‘60’s:

1) Koufax/Drysdale
2) Gibson/Carlton
3) Lolich/McClain
3) Seaver/Ryan (with Koosman as a backup).
 

DaCat

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
25,743
2,162
113
They did, but more “we expect competition between you, Jack, and a transfer TBD, but Jack is QB1 right now.”
It seems lost in all the angst of the Sully sympathy is the fact that Lausch improved enough to have passed Sully, even if that isn’t such a high bar. I’m extremely happy for Lausch… no more wasted energy on Sully for me.
 

techtim72

Senior
May 10, 2010
7,300
742
113
My brother was friends with the son of the local Episcopal minister who leaked to them that Carlton was getting married at his church. The two of them then waited outside during the ceremony and ambushed Carlton at the end of the aisle as he was leaving, getting his autograph on a baseball.

A hot stove league question from the ‘70’s was which was the best pitching duo on a team in the ‘60’s:

1) Koufax/Drysdale
2) Gibson/Carlton
3) Lolich/McClain
3) Seaver/Ryan (with Koosman as a backup).

Great question. Depends on which city you ask that question in, I suppose. I am not enough of a baseball fanatic to know the stats but I think a fair qualifier would be which was the best duo when they were on the same team or alternatively cumulative life time performance. I always thought Koufax was overrated because he pitched in a media hotbed plus his career was relatively short. But when he was good he was very, very good. Ryan wasn't as good - still good - in NYC as his later years in Texas. Same with Carlton between St Louis and Philadelphia. Have to look it up but wasn't Seaver/Ryan's best years in the '70's? Need a real baseball guru here.
 

xxxbobxxx

Sophomore
Mar 12, 2005
10,813
170
43
Great question. Depends on which city you ask that question in, I suppose. I am not enough of a baseball fanatic to know the stats but I think a fair qualifier would be which was the best duo when they were on the same team or alternatively cumulative life time performance. I always thought Koufax was overrated because he pitched in a media hotbed plus his career was relatively short. But when he was good he was very, very good. Ryan wasn't as good - still good - in NYC as his later years in Texas. Same with Carlton between St Louis and Philadelphia. Have to look it up but wasn't Seaver/Ryan's best years in the '70's? Need a real baseball guru here.
Seems like the best rotation would be the better question and I’ll submit about five years of the Braves w Maddux, Glavine, Smoltz and take your pick - Avery, Millwood.
 

techtim72

Senior
May 10, 2010
7,300
742
113
Seems like the best rotation would be the better question and I’ll submit about five years of the Braves w Maddux, Glavine, Smoltz and take your pick - Avery, Millwood.

I definitely agree with the rotation. Seemed like twenty years, however.
 

phatcat_rivals223240

All-Conference
Nov 5, 2001
18,977
1,130
113
It seems lost in all the angst of the Sully sympathy is the fact that Lausch improved enough to have passed Sully, even if that isn’t such a high bar. I’m extremely happy for Lausch… no more wasted energy on Sully for me.
Most of it had to be scheme, vs great improvement. Lujan abandoned the Geo Halas offense that Jake was running. How much could a guy imorove in a dozen practices (was still behind Sullivan AND Hilinski as of bowl game)
 

Just Gary

Sophomore
Dec 7, 2007
6,301
147
0
Most of it had to be scheme, vs great improvement. Lujan abandoned the Geo Halas offense that Jake was running. How much could a guy imorove in a dozen practices (was still behind Sullivan AND Hilinski as of bowl game)
Spring practice is where you show your off-season improvement, not where you start your improvement. Lujan’s offenses have been mobile running QBs, so it favors a Wright or Lausch over Sullivan or Hillinski.

Did you remember Siemian running the option? It was ugly. He had a much better arm but Kain was so much better as a running QB. I expect we will see more run option in the new offense and that requires a Kain, not a Trevor.
 

Purple Pile Driver

All-Conference
May 14, 2014
28,348
3,521
113
Most of it had to be scheme, vs great improvement. Lujan abandoned the Geo Halas offense that Jake was running. How much could a guy imorove in a dozen practices (was still behind Sullivan AND Hilinski as of bowl game)
Enough to pass a guy without an extensive history of success.
 

TheC

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
19,243
1,342
62
Spring practice is where you show your off-season improvement, not where you start your improvement. Lujan’s offenses have been mobile running QBs, so it favors a Wright or Lausch over Sullivan or Hillinski.

Did you remember Siemian running the option? It was ugly. He had a much better arm but Kain was so much better as a running QB. I expect we will see more run option in the new offense and that requires a Kain, not a Trevor.
Now you've done it....
 
Aug 31, 2003
15,073
506
113
Spring practice is where you show your off-season improvement, not where you start your improvement. Lujan’s offenses have been mobile running QBs, so it favors a Wright or Lausch over Sullivan or Hillinski.

Did you remember Siemian running the option? It was ugly. He had a much better arm but Kain was so much better as a running QB. I expect we will see more run option in the new offense and that requires a Kain, not a Trevor.
When it's more important for your QB to run than to pass...
 

phatcat_rivals223240

All-Conference
Nov 5, 2001
18,977
1,130
113
Spring practice is where you show your off-season improvement, not where you start your improvement. Lujan’s offenses have been mobile running QBs, so it favors a Wright or Lausch over Sullivan or Hillinski.

Did you remember Siemian running the option? It was ugly. He had a much better arm but Kain was so much better as a running QB. I expect we will see more run option in the new offense and that requires a Kain, not a Trevor.
Sullivan has way better running skills (not necessarily pocket mobility) than Trevor, and Kain as a true freshman runner was better than lausch (and most others) now.
 

Just Gary

Sophomore
Dec 7, 2007
6,301
147
0
Sullivan has way better running skills (not necessarily pocket mobility) than Trevor, and Kain as a true freshman runner was better than lausch (and most others) now.
Trevor and Kain were the extreme. The important point today is Wright and Lausch are more mobile than Sullivan.