Suicides, The Deaths Not Counted

dbjork6317

Heisman
Dec 3, 2009
18,385
71,752
113
That's logical bruh... Not killing people is basic human logic

I did phrase it in a way that a tard couldn't tell the difference... That's on me
They’re not people. They’re fetuses. Legally speaking, corporations are closer to people than a fetus is.
 

dbjork6317

Heisman
Dec 3, 2009
18,385
71,752
113
That is a bit debatable. The language on this bit of the constitution is a little ambiguous.

But , conceeding that point for this discussion's sake, There is no danger to what I am talking about. None. In fact it is really the common-sense way to do things.

If I'm a tennant in one of your rentals who isn't paying rent, and I have a kid in the living room, does that make it my house and not yours?
Well, does the rental agreement state that if a kid is born in the living room the house become yours? I’m guessing it doesn’t.

The constitution says “All persons born...in the United States...are citizens of the United States.” I don’t find that to be particularly ambiguous.
 

dbjork6317

Heisman
Dec 3, 2009
18,385
71,752
113
Current laws don't apply to this debate or I lost before it started so...

But they are alive and have human DNA so I think scientifically speaking they are the same as you and i
I take your point. I have a hard time with the idea that a “person” who is unable to survive without being physically attached to another person’s body is in the same category of personhood as you or me. Save for conjoined twins, I suppose.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BAnksMcFadden

BAnksMcFadden

Heisman
Jul 25, 2013
63,449
37,334
113
I say these things as I'm throwing stones in a glass house . I was a teenager encouraged am even younger person to evacuate a life from her. Am I sorry I did it personally ... No, I'm very successful and probably wouldn't be as so with the hindrance , but objectively was it the wrong thing to do? Absolutely. I effectively ended the life of a completly innocent person to benefit myself.
I take your point. I have a hard time with the idea that a “person” who is unable to survive without being physically attached to another person’s body is in the same category of personhood as you or me. Save for conjoined twins, I suppose.
 

dbjork6317

Heisman
Dec 3, 2009
18,385
71,752
113
I say these things as I'm throwing stones in a glass house . I was a teenager encouraged am even younger person to evacuate a life from her. Am I sorry I did it personally ... No, I'm very successful and probably wouldn't be as so with the hindrance , but objectively was it the wrong thing to do? Absolutely. I effectively ended the life of a completly innocent person to benefit myself.
Lots of folks with a very similar story out there, I’m sure.
 

TigerLion06

All-American
Jul 19, 2008
5,714
8,388
93
Serious question in a thread that's already lost all sanity. Hopefully one person's mind is clear enough to have a conversation.

All those deaths are horrible. Question about Covid and maybe one small difference. Do any of those other deaths have as many unknowns connected to it or the potential to increase exponentially DAILY? This is the key to getting a hold of this thing and why the number comparison is kind of meaningless right now.

I believe once we get a hold of what this actually is it can jump in line with the trivial ways people die everyday. Once we exhaust or efforts, vaccine, cures, preventative measures, etc to save people there will be an accepted amount of death associated with Covid just like everything else.
 

BAnksMcFadden

Heisman
Jul 25, 2013
63,449
37,334
113
Serious question in a thread that's already lost all sanity. Hopefully one person's mind is clear enough to have a conversation.

All those deaths are horrible. Question about Covid and maybe one small difference. Do any of those other deaths have as many unknowns connected to it or the potential to increase exponentially DAILY? This is the key to getting a hold of this thing and why the number comparison is kind of meaningless right now.

I believe once we get a hold of what this actually is it can jump in line with the trivial ways people die everyday. Once we exhaust or efforts, vaccine, cures, preventative measures, etc to save people there will be an accepted amount of death associated with Covid just like everything else.
Idk if your referring to our conversation but I believe that @dbjork6317 and I have had a reasonable debate. I apologize for the tard comment.

But in the end doesn't really matter
 
  • Like
Reactions: dbjork6317

dbjork6317

Heisman
Dec 3, 2009
18,385
71,752
113
Serious question in a thread that's already lost all sanity. Hopefully one person's mind is clear enough to have a conversation.

All those deaths are horrible. Question about Covid and maybe one small difference. Do any of those other deaths have as many unknowns connected to it or the potential to increase exponentially DAILY? This is the key to getting a hold of this thing and why the number comparison is kind of meaningless right now.

I believe once we get a hold of what this actually is it can jump in line with the trivial ways people die everyday. Once we exhaust or efforts, vaccine, cures, preventative measures, etc to save people there will be an accepted amount of death associated with Covid just like everything else.
You’re right. In the future it will be like the flu - just another thing you need a vaccine for that can be deadly to those already in poor health.

I’m not smart enough to know if it would work but could a covid vaccine be added to the vaccine schedule for children? Obviously the flu vaccine changes every year so I’m not sure if a single vaccine would work for covid.
 

GRMTiger

All-Conference
Mar 13, 2006
1,101
1,556
102
We should probably deal with the reality of human behavior rather than idealism based on whatever your personal morality is.

Although, if we were to create some sort of government mandated healthcare that required free birth control for all Americans, man that would probably really reduce abortions. Oh and hey, for the personal accountability aspect, we could levy a fine or tax on those who chose not to purchase a healthcare plan!

OR if we didn’t want to do that, maybe we could fund an organization that could provide such services to women in poverty...gosh I wonder what we could call it, they’re planning their families, planning how they want or don’t want to be parents...hmmm what could we call something that helps you plan for parenthood?

Are we willing to do those things so that we can cut down on abortions in the US? Are we willing to take on the cost burden that I mentioned previously that would result from millions more American children? Again I am 100% certain that you are perfectly willing to take on a higher tax burden if it means that all those kids are able to lead successful lives!
You’re right. In the future it will be like the flu - just another thing you need a vaccine for that can be deadly to those already in poor health.

I’m not smart enough to know if it would work but could a covid vaccine be added to the vaccine schedule for children? Obviously the flu vaccine changes every year so I’m not sure if a single vaccine would work for covid.
Are you absolutely certain that you aren’t smart enough?
 

TigerLion06

All-American
Jul 19, 2008
5,714
8,388
93
You’re right. In the future it will be like the flu - just another thing you need a vaccine for that can be deadly to those already in poor health.

I’m not smart enough to know if it would work but could a covid vaccine be added to the vaccine schedule for children? Obviously the flu vaccine changes every year so I’m not sure if a single vaccine would work for covid.

I don't even know if the exponential growth they are mentioning as possible is actually true but if it is if it were left to grow that would be ridiculous. Now I imagine and hope that they issued worse case scenarios that would never happen but to me that does make these comparisons moot. Does that make any sense?
 

TigerLion06

All-American
Jul 19, 2008
5,714
8,388
93
Idk if your referring to our conversation but I believe that @dbjork6317 and I have had a reasonable debate. I apologize for the tard comment.

But in the end doesn't really matter

Not in particular. Just that the thread turned into an abortion debate. I wasn't interested in that right now.
 

slycat

All-American
Oct 2, 2017
3,343
5,306
113
Well, does the rental agreement state that if a kid is born in the living room the house become yours? I’m guessing it doesn’t.

The constitution says “All persons born...in the United States...are citizens of the United States.” I don’t find that to be particularly ambiguous.

I'll dig in a bit later, but ok. At a minimum, it is stupid beyond the everyday stupid of the American Citizenry. Seriously someone here against the law somehow obligates citizens? YGTBSM!
 

P. Marlowe

Heisman
Dec 7, 2009
14,076
25,926
101
I'll dig in a bit later, but ok. At a minimum, it is stupid beyond the everyday stupid of the American Citizenry. Seriously someone here against the law somehow obligates citizens? YGTBSM!

He’s worried about the cost burden created by the aborted babies of us citizens. So, I’m sure he’s not cool with amnesty for illegals...

Are we willing to take on the cost burden that I mentioned previously that would result from millions more American children?

So...I’m agreeing. Let’s ban abortion, then increase spending on public schools so we can properly educate those kids. We’ll probably have to increase entitlements so that those single parents can afford to feed the kids and so that they can have some form of healthcare. Or hey, you know, they can keep going to the emergency room with no insurance and pass that burden onto us!

We also that even as those kids turn 18, statistically speaking, about half will become tax payers and the other half won’t and may actually need government assistance of their own. And as those public schools get more and more crowded we’ll certainly have to continue to increase spending there.

So, hey man, let’s do it. Let’s ban abortion and make sure we go full force into protecting the sanctity of these kids’ lives by making sure they can have as much success as possible. I just know that good people like you would have no problem putting their money where their pro-life stance is through tax increases.
 

dbjork6317

Heisman
Dec 3, 2009
18,385
71,752
113
He’s worried about the cost burden created by the aborted babies of us citizens. So, I’m sure he’s not cool with amnesty for illegals...
I’m the one saying let’s do it. It’s all you “pro-life” folks that won’t put your money on the line for your morality.
 

MKOTiger

Heisman
Jun 10, 2006
14,190
12,806
113
2,618 Suicides today as of this post and 302122 in 2020 so far.

https://www.who.int/mental_health/prevention/suicide/suicideprevent/en/

WHO says there are close to 800,000 per year so:

800,000/365 = 2191 per day

How many do we have so far today? 2618 and we still have a few more hours to go. Load the link at 5 til midnight to get close to today’s numbers. Hint it’s increasing. Exponentially growing!

or 302,133/103 = 2933 per day which is much much worse!

or 2933 x 365 = 1,070,545 VS 800,000

that’s roughly a 25% increase!!! Or 61,000 more this current year 2020! It will kill many more than Covid-19 because it is just getting started as in 3/4 weeks old (economy shutdown) and Covid-19 is peaking (now 5 months old).
This is a ridiculous post. First, suicide rates have been increasing worldwide since 1999. A lot of this has to do with governmental reporting. So it’s going up no matter what. Second, you can’t compare US and other country suicide rates, to show that An economic downturn due to Covid is responsible. Social, triggers, stress and, again, acknowledgement varies widely. At best, you can say it’s a contributing factor, but not the sole factor. Finally, approximately 50,000 people died in the us last user due to suicide. Even with a 25% increase that you’ve pointed out, that would only be 12,500 more deaths, which is minor in comparison to the 100,000+ that will die in the US from Covid 19, even with social distancing.
 

acwill07

Joined Jan 28, 2008
Jan 28, 2008
153,121
69,976
107
It isn't anti-libertarian to want the government to be able to tell people they can't torture and kill babies, because that is exactly what abortion is. Let's be clear about that. It is the torture and killing of a being that feels pain. If you say you don't want to regulate killing and certain other horrible things then you are not a libertarian. You are an anarchist.

So you're saying it is torture of a being that feels pain when a pregnancy is aborted in the first trimester? I don't think that's true.

Now if we are talking late term abortions, absolutely. However I don't know why people even bring those up.....unless I'm wrong they are illegal in every state. You can only get an abortion in the first 12 weeks, no?
 

BigTimeTiger

Heisman
Aug 17, 2008
10,497
14,141
0
Must stop abortions! Protect life! Women dying from botched abortion procedures...eh what can ya do

No emotional stuff here. I don’t really care enough about the abortion issue to be emotional about it. I find that those who consider it murder are driven far more by their emotional reactions, which is why many don’t really consider what it would mean for society if abortion actually went away and largely don’t care about what happens to the child after they’re actually born. So long as they’re not being “murdered.”

And is it really a libertarian stance to want the government to regulate what medical procedures people can or cannot choose to have?
So let’s make murder legal. Dude you are one stupid ****.
 

BigTimeTiger

Heisman
Aug 17, 2008
10,497
14,141
0
This is a ridiculous post. First, suicide rates have been increasing worldwide since 1999. A lot of this has to do with governmental reporting. So it’s going up no matter what. Second, you can’t compare US and other country suicide rates, to show that An economic downturn due to Covid is responsible. Social, triggers, stress and, again, acknowledgement varies widely. At best, you can say it’s a contributing factor, but not the sole factor. Finally, approximately 50,000 people died in the us last user due to suicide. Even with a 25% increase that you’ve pointed out, that would only be 12,500 more deaths, which is minor in comparison to the 100,000+ that will die in the US from Covid 19, even with social distancing.
Those are worldwide numbers and 25% is an enormous increase. That’s 12,000 a month! Face it you got the facts you didn’t want. The economic disaster will be around long after Covid-19 is but a memory. Do yourself a favor and call a therapist tomorrow. Ask them how it’s going. Then reply
 
Last edited by a moderator:

MaxCalifornia

Heisman
Apr 24, 2016
29,058
79,616
113
Must stop abortions! Protect life! Women dying from botched abortion procedures...eh what can ya do

No emotional stuff here. I don’t really care enough about the abortion issue to be emotional about it. I find that those who consider it murder are driven far more by their emotional reactions, which is why many don’t really consider what it would mean for society if abortion actually went away and largely don’t care about what happens to the child after they’re actually born. So long as they’re not being “murdered.”

And is it really a libertarian stance to want the government to regulate what medical procedures people can or cannot choose to have?
Thank God @Cris_Ard has the good sense not to hire a raging, liberal, unable to control he/she/it’s emotions, lunatic like yourself to write for this site.
 

Steven15

Hall of Famer
Feb 26, 2011
55,270
152,433
0
Those are worldwide numbers and 25% is an enormous increase. That’s 12,000 a month! Face it you got the facts you didn’t want. The economic disaster will be around long after Covid-19 is but a memory. Do yourself a favor and call a therapist tomorrow. Ask them how it’s going. Then reply
Somehow your sig is the worst thing ITT
 
  • Like
Reactions: dbjork6317

whitesixmile

Heisman
Aug 30, 2015
6,258
10,894
107
I’m 100% with you man. Let’s ban all abortion! Had we done that in 2002 that would mean there would be approximately 12 million more people under 18 in the US right now. About half of them would have been born to a mother living below the poverty line.

So...I’m agreeing. Let’s ban abortion, then increase spending on public schools so we can properly educate those kids. We’ll probably have to increase entitlements so that those single parents can afford to feed the kids and so that they can have some form of healthcare. Or hey, you know, they can keep going to the emergency room with no insurance and pass that burden onto us!

We also that even as those kids turn 18, statistically speaking, about half will become tax payers and the other half won’t and may actually need government assistance of their own. And as those public schools get more and more crowded we’ll certainly have to continue to increase spending there.

So, hey man, let’s do it. Let’s ban abortion and make sure we go full force into protecting the sanctity of these kids’ lives by making sure they can have as much success as possible. I just know that good people like you would have no problem putting their money where their pro-life stance is through tax increases.
You do know that poor people can’t afford abortions right. They just go ahead and have them so they can get extra government help.
 

MKOTiger

Heisman
Jun 10, 2006
14,190
12,806
113
Those are worldwide numbers and 25% is an enormous increase. That’s 12,000 a month! Face it you got the facts you didn’t want. The economic disaster will be around long after Covid-19 is but a memory. Do yourself a favor and call a therapist tomorrow. Ask them how it’s going. Then reply
That is such BS. Where is this coming from? You are absolutely nuts.
 

johnhugh

Heisman
Dec 23, 2003
74,053
34,454
98
Or, people could be responsible and accountable for the decisions they make by not bringing children they can’t afford into the world, and/or have the common sense to take advantage of the myriad low cost birth control options available today.
Lololololololol
 

sa-clemtiger1

All-Conference
Nov 10, 2002
53,878
4,707
113
I take your point. I have a hard time with the idea that a “person” who is unable to survive without being physically attached to another person’s body is in the same category of personhood as you or me. Save for conjoined twins, I suppose.
Ah, so killing the baby as long as it’s still attached to the umbilical chord is fine with you? Got it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigTimeTiger

clemsonu96

Heisman
Jan 25, 2008
46,245
21,655
97
This has been one of my bigger points when it comes to this shutdown. Nobody is talking about that side of the equation. It’s all about flattening the curve. Has to be a middle ground somewhere.
60 Minutes, which has become unbearable lately had one story on the mental toll the shutdown is causing. Also, had a great story on the Greek Orthodox Church near the twin towers that got destroyed on 9/11 and how they are trying to build a memorial for it as well. Great story on Easter.
 

Ole Tom

Heisman
Aug 30, 2001
4,201
11,655
0
On the issue of suicide......

I am uneducated about many aspects of suicide. I suspect a huge percentage of suicides are driven by some sort of odd brain chemistry that leads to depression and a sense of worthlessness. I hope that medical science can make some progress on such mental conditions. I have read that suicides seem to have a genetic basis as the problem runs in families.

I'm not at all sure you can 'think' yourself into a state of mind that prevents depression and suicide, but I suspect that a good attitude and positive expectations are helpful. We are all valuable. We are all worthwhile. Never give up. Never ever give up.

It's not much, but it is all I got. I have 3 kids and when they were growing up, I thought about their states of mind, their sense of being valued and the importance of living through whatever life brings. So far so good, but as I said earlier, I think suicides the sign of a brain sickness we do not yet understand.