Starting Five?

SkilletHead2

All-American
Sep 30, 2005
24,451
9,276
113
So, people who know, who starts, who is in the rotation, and what kinds of games can we expect from them?

(I've been on a sports roller coaster with Mets/Rutgers/All Blacks; need some down the road speculation.)
 

BKIn118

All-American
Dec 16, 2001
10,511
5,942
113
Sanders, Daniels, Foreman, Freeman, Lewis. First off the bench depends on matchups
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: SkilletHead2

Greene Rice FIG

Heisman
Dec 30, 2005
40,437
23,613
0
looks like a big lineup vs. OOC weaker opponents. I could definitely see a guard coming in early to spell one of the F mans. I like starting the 5 that deserve it, even if matchup wise it isnt optimal.
 

TrueRU

Senior
Feb 4, 2004
2,414
717
113
Sanders, Daniels, Foreman, Feeeman, Lewis. First off the bench depends on matchups
Interesting. This lineup would seemingly give us more depth as our only "true" 3 is Laurent, and he will come off the bench. I thought they might go with Williams in the starting lineup and Daniels off the bench (playing starter's minutes) as the spark.
 

higgins3

All-Conference
Dec 15, 2012
7,319
2,434
113
Interesting. This lineup would seemingly give us more depth as our only "true" 3 is Laurent, and he will come off the bench. I thought they might go with Williams in the starting lineup and Daniels off the bench (playing starter's minutes) as the spark.

If Daniels improves, he might have that spot. I expect him and Williams to compete a lot this year for minutes. I think with tuning, DJ could be a great 3. He has the ability and has been putting in extra shots supposedly.


I am fine with Laurent being a spark off the bench at the small forward/wing type position.EJ sees it everyday, I trust him putting Daniels there over Williams. I think throughout the season though, you have a good fight for who really deserves that spot. If Daniels cuts his turnovers to 1 a game and tightens up his defense, you have a decent player.
 

Skull83

All-Conference
Jul 31, 2001
2,457
3,350
98
My organized basketball career deservedly ended in 7th grade so I don't pretend to have any real expertise, but I've been a men's basketball season ticket holder for more than 25 years and seen a lot of players come through the RAC, and Daniels really intrigues me. Many of his shots look really good but they just don't fall. He seems to have a good handle, but then he commits dumb turnovers. I really feel that he has legitimate talent, but for some reason it just hasn't come together for him. I'm hoping another year and playing with Sanders makes a difference.
 
  • Like
Reactions: treauRU

treauRU

Redshirt
Jun 19, 2015
60
33
0
If Daniels improves, he might have that spot. I expect him and Williams to compete a lot this year for minutes. I think with tuning, DJ could be a great 3. He has the ability and has been putting in extra shots supposedly.


I am fine with Laurent being a spark off the bench at the small forward/wing type position.EJ sees it everyday, I trust him putting Daniels there over Williams. I think throughout the season though, you have a good fight for who really deserves that spot. If Daniels cuts his turnovers to 1 a game and tightens up his defense, you have a decent player.

Sanders ability with ball will create space for Daniels mid range game. Daniels is not a long range shooter at all. He will dribble into his shots in transition and get to the elbow in the half court. He averaged 8 last year, that number will go up, the turnovers will come down. Look guys, without Bishop on Sanders`s wing I really would not be as optimistic as I am.
But I know you guys will have to see it to believe it.
 

jellyman_rivals307848

All-Conference
Jul 25, 2001
15,252
2,926
0
Sanders, Daniels, Foreman, Feeeman, Lewis. First off the bench depends on matchups

So ... the depth chart:

PG: Sanders, Williams
2G: Daniels, Grier, Goode
WF: Foreman, Laurent, Grier
PF: Freeman, Foreman, Diallo
C: Lewis, Diallo

This with Doorson hurt ... who am I missing? No one, I think.

I would think Foreman can slide to PF at times, and RU can go with a 3-guard line-up at times, with Grier (6'4" or so) as the WF position.

RU basically goes just 9 deep, unless Goode can truly help, and until Doorson comes back. And a little short players at PF and C. I would think RU would need TWO post-type players in the next class, with Lewis graduating, and Freeman to be a Senior that year. After this season RU would have just Freeman, Diallo and Doorson, plus Foreman in a pinch, at the PF/C positions.
 

RUforJERSEY

All-American
Jul 29, 2001
24,794
9,998
113
So ... the depth chart:

PG: Sanders, Williams
2G: Daniels, Grier, Goode
WF: Foreman, Laurent, Grier
PF: Freeman, Foreman, Diallo
C: Lewis, Diallo

This with Doorson hurt ... who am I missing? No one, I think.

I would think Foreman can slide to PF at times, and RU can go with a 3-guard line-up at times, with Grier (6'4" or so) as the WF position.

RU basically goes just 9 deep, unless Goode can truly help, and until Doorson comes back. And a little short players at PF and C. I would think RU would need TWO post-type players in the next class, with Lewis graduating, and Freeman to be a Senior that year. After this season RU would have just Freeman, Diallo and Doorson, plus Foreman in a pinch, at the PF/C positions.
Williams isn't a PG. I think Daniels will shift there with somebody else sliding in at SG when it's time for a breather for Sanders.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scarlet Shack

ColonelRutgers

All-American
Dec 15, 2003
7,090
9,245
113
Williams isn't a PG. I think Daniels will shift there with somebody else sliding in at SG when it's time for a breather for Sanders.
Agree. He didn't live up to the shooter label at all last year but if he is going to contribute this year it has to be as the three point shooter receiving kick outs from Sanders and to a lesser extent Daniels. Not a PG. I can definitely see him as the third guard in a lot of three guard lineup. Got to have SOMEONE on the floor willing to pull the trigger from outside. And I don't want it to be Foreman.
 

MADHAT1

Heisman
Apr 1, 2003
31,404
16,246
113
Williams isn't a PG. I think Daniels will shift there with somebody else sliding in at SG when it's time for a breather for Sanders.

That's what I thought and felt Daniels was the closest to a #1 between him and Williams.
Also ( on this board) heard Goode might be the back-up
 

BKIn118

All-American
Dec 16, 2001
10,511
5,942
113
Other than with Sanders, don't think it will matter much who starts....

He is turning out to be a difference maker by all accounts
 
  • Like
Reactions: treauRU

TruJerz_rivals

Freshman
Jun 5, 2015
232
89
0
Sanders, Daniels, Foreman, Freeman, Lewis. First off the bench depends on matchups

are you confirming this or is this your guess?

I like this lineup. I expected Grier to start at the 3 since I heard a talk about a 3 guard lineup but was also rooting for Foreman to win the starting job assuming he worked on his outside game this offseason
 

higgins3

All-Conference
Dec 15, 2012
7,319
2,434
113
Sanders ability with ball will create space for Daniels mid range game. Daniels is not a long range shooter at all. He will dribble into his shots in transition and get to the elbow in the half court. He averaged 8 last year, that number will go up, the turnovers will come down. Look guys, without Bishop on Sanders`s wing I really would not be as optimistic as I am.
But I know you guys will have to see it to believe it.

No doubt. Sander will have to beat defenders and give Daniels the look. I follow your lead though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: treauRU

higgins3

All-Conference
Dec 15, 2012
7,319
2,434
113
No doubt. Sander will have to beat defenders and give Daniels the look. I follow your lead though.

Our season will be 2 wins better if both of them run an offense without turning the ball over more than 1-2 times a game. Actually. maybe 4-5 wins.
 

seels2662

Heisman
Aug 16, 2005
24,383
16,900
113
Have to say, I do not like Daniels starting. Just going by last year, I would rather have Daniels be the 6th man and be the spark. as soon as he starts to be out of control, then we can take him back out.

I am hoping that WIlliams and Goode can own most of the minutes at shooting guard. To have a sherpshhooter out there at all times spreads out the defense and will work in our favor.
 

Degaz-RU

Heisman
Dec 19, 2002
22,308
26,532
88
A few points:

1. I know Daniels has his faults -- he can be out of control/turnover prone, and isn't a natural shooter -- but he needs to play 25+ mpg because we need some senior leadership in the backcourt.

2. From what I read, I'm not sure Goode has the athleticism to play more than 6-8 mpg as a spot-up shooter. So I think we're going to war with basically three guards (Sanders, Daniels, Williams) plus Grier as a G/WF swingman. Hopefully Goode will prove the naysayers wrong on this point, because it sure would be nice to have a guy out there who can hit a long range jumper consistently.

3. In that regard, will Williams regain the shooting form he had in high school, when he was widely regarded as one of the best shooters in NYC?

4. The WF position scares me a bit. Foreman has never shown an ability to hit an outside shot. His skill set seems more "4" than "3", except he's undersized for a PF. But who knows, guys improve a lot by junior year, so maybe he can take the next step as a 3.

5. I really hope Doorson's injury heals up quickly so that he doesn't have to redshirt. We will need his size when the B1G conference schedule rolls around, and we can't afford him coming back in January and being rusty.

6. I am really excited to see what Sanders brings to the table. There hasn't been this much buzz about a recruit on the Banks since Corey Chandler and Mike Rosario. Hopefully this one works out better than those did...
 

BKIn118

All-American
Dec 16, 2001
10,511
5,942
113
Not confirming anything...just my thoughts on the matter.

I've been consistent in saying that the starters won't be as important as who finishes. Practice is going to go a long way to determining minutes from game to game
 

MadRU

Heisman
Jul 26, 2001
38,145
19,485
98
Didn't leave, was never here. Just a verbal, never was signed or officially part of the team. Sucks, but we need to keep recruiting players.
 

higgins3

All-Conference
Dec 15, 2012
7,319
2,434
113
Not as scared with Foreman at the 3. As long as he keeps his handle low, I think he can do a lot. He needs to rebound and help there.

We all know we need to score, but to say Rutgers is going to recruit lights out scorers is probably not realistic right now.


A ryan Johnson type was great. He struggled with academics,though. That is a player we want and need to look for.