Toggle sidebar

Some thoughts from Cuse board

S

Scangg

Heisman
Mar 19, 2016
25,448
49,369
113
Checked out a cuse board and there was some good discussion... here are some thoughts from their view

- first some props as many fans brought up how we got screwed last year and despite hating us they actually felt for Rutgers fans and the ending of the NCAA drought

- Rutgers doesn't shoot the 3 well or often. They also can't shoot FTs so they should hack us around the rim

- Rutgers calling card is defense and physical play. We are bigger and more athletic and will try to get out and run. Good test for Cuse

- acknowledge Rutgers has strength at the 5 and a rebounding blocking presence there. Marek at 5 they are saying could be a matchup problem for us on the perimeter and they hope to draw the bigs away and use Marek to pick up fouls on our bigs

-they expect Kadary to be a matchup problem for us on both ends. Expecting a short bench rotation this game so foul trouble is a concern if Rutgers plays physical and attacks the rim
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUhobbit, nealbo1, DirtyRU and 1 other person
R

RU85inFla

Heisman
Aug 4, 2003
15,555
10,537
73
It's gonna be hard for Cuse to be physical inside with a short bench. Gonna run out of fouls.

Looking for a good game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scangg
S

Scangg

Heisman
Mar 19, 2016
25,448
49,369
113
Greene Rice FIG said:
Quadry Ismail?

The missle’s brother is using COVId to get an extra year of eligibility in a different sport?
Click to expand...
Is this in regards to Kadary? He's a 4 star top 100 freshman 6'5 180... first test of a real P5 team for him and sounds like he might be welcomed to B1G basketball with a dose of Montez Mathis which will not be an enjoyable experience... he actually could see a lot more Mulcahy on him with Mathis on Griffen
 
J

jordkap

All-Conference
Jul 11, 2016
2,834
4,483
77
Scangg said:
Checked out a cuse board and there was some good discussion... here are some thoughts from their view

- first some props as many fans brought up how we got screwed last year and despite hating us they actually felt for Rutgers fans and the ending of the NCAA drought

- Rutgers doesn't shoot the 3 well or often. They also can't shoot FTs so they should hack us around the rim

- Rutgers calling card is defense and physical play. We are bigger and more athletic and will try to get out and run. Good test for Cuse

- acknowledge Rutgers has strength at the 5 and a rebounding blocking presence there. Marek at 5 they are saying could be a matchup problem for us on the perimeter and they hope to draw the bigs away and use Marek to pick up fouls on our bigs

-they expect Kadary to be a matchup problem for us on both ends. Expecting a short bench rotation this game so foul trouble is a concern if Rutgers plays physical and attacks the rim
Click to expand...
If Rutgers shoots their averages, this will be a win for sure. I fully expect to come out sloppy due to the layoff. However Rutgers should be able to grind out this win tonight barring a very bad showing
 
G

GoodOl'Rutgers

Heisman
Sep 11, 2006
123,974
19,586
0
I think someone on Cuse has to go nuts from 3 point range if they are going to win... or they get every foul call and shoot 20 more FTs than we do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scangg
G

Greene Rice FIG

Heisman
Dec 30, 2005
40,437
23,613
0
Apparently there is no U. I’d love to be able to throw his name down on a scrabble board if I got stuck with the Q and had no U
 
R

RU848789

Heisman
Jul 27, 2001
65,217
44,292
113
I'll never care what anyone says about it - we broke our tourney drought last year.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom