the Ethics Commission may have to rule again.
I hope so. I love having official documents that prove those bastards are unethical
the Ethics Commission may have to rule again.
This must be really really 17ing bad
No, because then its not paid for by state funds.
Why doesn't every school cover themselves by doing it this way? I'm guessing there is some sort of precedent or rule about this. Otherwise schools would just officially pay coaches for breathing/holding down the carpet and everything else they do is paid for by private funds or on their own dime so it could always be classified a private or out of the scope of work.
"Coach, how many in home visits did you make?"
"As an official representative of XYZ university, 1." (12 while selling hair care products or on mission trips)
Also, I guess their booster club would need to turn over all receipts for the last 5 years proving no state funds went towards his cell phone?
As a retired state employee, when the rules changed once cell phones became the norm I gave mine up and got my own because I didn’t want to reimburse them for my personal calls and I was in charge of collecting the cost of every personal call made. Well long story short, we went thru a couple of situations that I had to meet with the auditors that wear guns and they got my phone records because I did state business on my phone, so bottom line doesn’t matter who pays for it it’s there for them and our attorney’s told me that and I didn’t get the opportunity to redact any of my calls…but I didn’t have any hooker numbers either….
The good news: doesn't look like Nutt will be settling anytime soon.
Mars: Phone arrangement through Foundation was a departure from Nutt's tenure. Why would school would create/allow that arrangement?
— Pat Forde (@YahooForde) July 31, 2017
My conspiracy theory is becoming more and more true. They got him fired on purpose. That number was not redacted when it got to Mars office for a reason.after having submitted records from an FOI request, is now going to say these phone records aren't subject to an FOI request.
[TWEET]892113113583169537[/TWEET]
No, Hugh resigned his job due to a "pattern of personal misconduct" that violated his morals clause. It doesn't really matter how his employer found out about it, once they knew about it he was gone. It is weird that it only came to UMiss's attention due to a records request and a failure to redact all private calls, because they really should have known about it already. Plus, I'm willing to bet that Freeze was involved in the redaction of those records, so he cannot complain about an invasion of his privacy. If his privacy was valuable, then he should have taken better care to protect it.
I'm not going to say you are wrong but I still don't see how this is a huge positive for Ole Miss. Yes, they get him out the door without having to pay him, but then they still drape their arm around him for the COI plus they stay with Matt Luke so you don't even get the advantage of having the seat open to find a coach. I thought for sure they would start talking "Freeze fooled us all!" Without using this to help the case with the NCAA it just seems like you would be turning out Freeze who might turn on you.My conspiracy theory is becoming more and more true. They got him fired on purpose. That number was not redacted when it got to Mars office for a reason.
I hope you're right, although I don't see how Ole Miss can go back now after already giving up records.
If that matters then why do coaches contracts have to be approved by the IHL?the money, or funding. It depends on who paid for it, a private entity or a state/govt entity.
My conspiracy theory is becoming more and more true. They got him fired on purpose. That number was not redacted when it got to Mars office for a reason.