Does Rutgers MBB believe he will be a shooter next year? 5 for 12 on threes last year. Can he shoot 40% with a lot more shots? We will see how he has developed !
He is one of several players that could be a lot better than they have beenIn BB confidence is such a key trait, I don't think he had it last year.
In a zone ? The perimeter?What position can he defend?
I had a dream wherein the 23-24 “Three and no man to man D” 5 or 6 man grouping wasWhat position can he defend?
He could be an elite shooter but you need more to play in the Big 10. Foster Loyer got processed off Michigan State and then shot 44% from 3 at Davidson. Jaheam Cornwall was a 40+% shooter at Gardner-Webb but barely saw the floor after grad transferring to Penn State. Charlie Easley was a walkon at Nebraska who earned a scholarship but was terrible when he played in games. The last two seasons he's shot 47% at South Dakota State. On and on it goes.He's not an elite shooter. He's been recruited over and I think it's a long shot he sees much action.
Would love to see Oskar improve his defense so he can be on the floor a bit more. He has the size and the touch to be a stretch 4 for us. He’s also a lefty which gives him a natural advantage. If he develops a good head fake and quick first step he can go strong to the rim and draw fouls against opposing bigs who help on D.Oskar can shoot. Needs to show he can guard the 4 and rebound to get minutes. He showed defensive effort last year and even tried to draw charges. The physicality of the game seemed too much for him at times, lack of confidence, trouble staying on his feet.
I wouldn't count on Oskar, but you never know... mods say how amazingly athletic he is so it's possible it comes together for him. More likely he doesn't see significant minutes without injuries to Hyatt or Mag to clear minutes for the 4
I don't think Oskar is a big story line at all. He's basically the 3rd string 4 (or 4th if you count Reiber)Offense isn't the kids problem. He doesn't guard any position on the floor well enough to earn significant minutes at this point. He basically cost us a win up at UMass this season because of it.
Not to say he isn't capable of improvement, but we all know Pike's MO with these sorts of things. He's gonna need to show it first. It'll be a big storyline moving into next season.
The downside I see from him is he is slow and soft on defense and cannot create his own shot. The upside is he has a sweet stroke just needs yo get out there more and play but he will gave to rely on his mates to work him open for shotsHe actually has a nice stroke from the arc. Probably needs to get tougher on defense to make up for lack of quickness. Also, while his stroke looks good, he appears to press on shots and not be fluid within the offense. I have no idea how much of that is system vs. himself. If he become a reliable shooter, he can help out a lot. We will see in November / December whether he is able to take the next step.
Nobody thought Reiber would be a story either…just saying. Pike will give him every chance to earn minutes. Let’s see if the kid responds.I don't think Oskar is a big story line at all. He's basically the 3rd string 4 (or 4th if you count Reiber)
He would be a luxury at this point if he turns into something but expectations are pretty low to the point where he really isn't a story line at all
I said Reiber was a baller for the beginning. One of the very very few though. Oskar came in a year before and has shown less. He's further down the depth chart. It could happen, but it seems unlikely.Nobody thought Reiber would be a story either…just saying. Pike will give him every chance to earn minutes. Let’s see if the kid responds.
If Pikiell did not think he has a chance to continue to develop and possibly contribute he probably would have been in the transfer portal. I actually thought he would go transfer portal.I said Reiber was a baller for the beginning. One of the very very few though. Oskar came in a year before and has shown less. He's further down the depth chart. It could happen, but it seems unlikely.
My point was just you said Oskar's development would be a big story line going into the season... but I don't think it will be much of a story at all. More like an afterthought unless he surprises.
In your dream, were they playing in Phoenix? https://www.ncaa.com/mens-final-four/future-infoI had a dream wherein the 23-24 “Three and no man to man D” 5 or 6 man grouping was
Cliff Ohnoruyi
Dean Threiber
Big O Palmquist/Spencer
Gavin Giffiths
Paul Mulcahy
They played zone and it was a good zone.
When Hyatt, Mag and Miller were in, they pressed…and it was a good press.
Oskar isn't the type of player you run your offense through anyway. He's a floor spacer on offense, not a creator or one on one scorerBlah, Blah, Blah, no one has seen enough of him to say what he can do or cant do. When your in the game with Geo, Harper, McConnel, Cliff your not exactly 1st choice to run the ball through. This is his year to step up and get real mins to show us what he is capable of.
I didn't know Clyde Frazier posts here...Would like to see the Swede succeed! Has some O - needs to find the D.
I also think his shot is a bit too slow.Offense isn't the kids problem. He doesn't guard any position on the floor well enough to earn significant minutes at this point. He basically cost us a win up at UMass this season because of it.
Not to say he isn't capable of improvement, but we all know Pike's MO with these sorts of things. He's gonna need to show it first. It'll be a big storyline moving into next season.
I kinda like Rieber's answer to getting beat because of lack of quick.. he just reframes the problem as one of getting to where he can block the upcoming shot from behind. I think Palquist has the height/length to do the same.. if he can jump, and I assume he can...Probably needs to get tougher on defense to make up for lack of quickness..
Maybe. Add Derek Simpson (he a straight up baller) to the press grouping and you really could go with each style for half the game. It would be tough for teams to prepare for essentially two teams within one.In your dream, were they playing in Phoenix? https://www.ncaa.com/mens-final-four/future-info
If Palmquist can step up in this regard it does preserve Rieber to backup Cliff.I kinda like Rieber's answer to getting beat because of lack of quick.. he just reframes the problem as one of getting to where he can block the upcoming shot from behind. I think Palquist has the height/length to do the same.. if he can jump, and I assume he can.
well.. some site says he is now 6'8" and 220.. the average weight of NBA teams is shown here... 200 is below the average which includes all positions.. and power forwards should be heavier.. beefier. If he adds 10 lbs of muscle this offseason.. and it doesn't completely screw up his shot.. could be somethingIf Palmquist can step up in this regard it does preserve Rieber to backup Cliff.
Yea, one game he fell like 3 times on one possessionI just remember the game where he looked like a bowling pin - just getting knocked down, getting up to get knocked down again.
I was with you. Reiber's HS tape showed a pretty polished big capable of scoring from all 3 levels. Decent handle too.I said Reiber was a baller for the beginning. One of the very very few though. Oskar came in a year before and has shown less. He's further down the depth chart. It could happen, but it seems unlikely.
My point was just you said Oskar's development would be a big story line going into the season... but I don't think it will be much of a story at all. More like an afterthought unless he surprises.
Oskar can be an effective 3 point shooter against a zone defense. That’s where I see him at this point.I also think his shot is a bit too slow.
Basically he needs to be left wiiiide open to be a threat