Skj transferrin

morgousky

Heisman
Sep 5, 2009
23,959
43,170
0
I agree, but maybe with a few more of Richards' min, SKJ could've been a valuable 4 year guy. I'd argue NR didn't show me anything more than SKJ yet Cal stuck with him like glue. SKJ actually showed improvement while NR literally regressed.

Richards is a 7 foot big man with lots of potential. I can see why Cal went in that direction. if Richards could have turned a corner we would have been in the final four.
 
Mar 13, 2004
14,745
12,925
0
I'm in agreement that Sacha was somewhat overhyped here, though I obviously wanted him back. More players, more experience is always a good thing. But people kept declaring him obviously better than Richards, despite producing at a significantly lower level then Richards with similar playing time. Richards was bashed for being turnover and foul prone (which he is) but Sacha turned it over and fouled MORE frequently. Richards rebounded better. Richards could actually hit free throws. I'm not sure what Cal should have done to keep SKJ - he gave him equal PT as our other big man who produced more points/rebounds/blocks in similar time. I guess he could have stopped recruiting?

Best wishes to Sacha. I wanted to see what you could do here in the next couple years, but it's entirely possible, maybe likely, he'd have stayed at his ~15 mpg and never really broke out. Hopefully none of our other front court players leave - SKJ would have ranked last on my list of priorities to return.
 

MWes11

Heisman
Apr 22, 2012
12,025
10,106
0
I can vouch @CatColumbia he will be here.

He is not a pumper by any means and a bit more on the cynical side, but he is rarely overboard on his opinions, and definitley a long time big blue fan.
Fair enough and I wasn't actually questioning his fandom as I can tell he is passionate. Just hope when we are succeeding he is giving props as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: brianpoe

brianpoe

Heisman
Mar 25, 2009
27,769
21,825
113
SKJ is approaching Pilgrim status here. I see nothing wrong with Cal recruiting over SKJ. I actually wanted it to happen and stated it over a month ago.

SKJ was never going to produce here.

Now if JV, PJ, Gabriel, or Green leave I will have problems with Cal.


I dont mind EVERY player being over recruited, I'd like to have seen SKJ improve over the summer and fight for that Center spot. Give me a solid 7 footer over a 6'7 guy any day.

Alas, it wasnt in him.
 

TankedCat

Heisman
Nov 8, 2006
22,792
21,500
0
Back when playing time was brought up to Cal in February

"“So, again, this team, I love the fact -- PJ didn’t care that he’s not starting. Hasn’t said one word, and he’s playing his best right now. I didn’t start Wenyen in the second half, he didn’t say anything. These guys are all right now bought into what we have to do. We’ve got a couple guys thinking they should play more. But look at the guy in front of you. If I really think that, I’ll say who do you think you should be playing in front of? Tell him to his face, and that dude would probably laugh at him. You’re out of your mind. Lucky you played at all.""

Think he was referencing SKJ?
 

anon1763419335

All-American
Feb 10, 2006
23,231
5,077
113
Yes. Never saw much in SKJ. Always wondered why anyone was high on him. Lost 90% of the time, bad defense, and has a jump shot that rarely goes in.

It's a false choice anyway. EJ replaced him, and I'll take that all day.

i think the shock is that coming in most thought SKJ would be a pick and pop guy that could make 12-15 jump shots. just never happened. really like the kid, wish he stayed. gave us a spark at times.

i'd take richards too. has too much upside. but now its on him to develop it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: morgousky

fatguy87

All-American
Oct 8, 2004
13,764
9,093
0
Yes. Never saw much in SKJ. Always wondered why anyone was high on him. Lost 90% of the time, bad defense, and has a jump shot that rarely goes in.

The frustration from Richards starting despite poor played created a blind spot regarding SKJ's performance. SKJ was generally given benefit of the doubt because he wasn't bestowed with the title of "starter."
 

brianpoe

Heisman
Mar 25, 2009
27,769
21,825
113
Quit playing freshman ahead of soph's that dont deserve it ????


If Cal thinks the frosh is more talented and will help more in March that aint happening.

Regardless if we like it or not.

Apparently Richards potential was much greater than the little bit SKJ had on him....?
 
  • Like
Reactions: mdlUK.1

morgousky

Heisman
Sep 5, 2009
23,959
43,170
0
"If". Did you see any sign of improvement? Any? I sure didn't.

It's a fair point. But I'm just saying I know why Cal went in that direction. We got beat as soon as we faced a decent team because we had no JV and no NR. We depended on SKJ to play a lot of those minutes. And we flamed out.

He's simply not that good, at all. He's been at UK a while and little changed.

He's been recruited over. I'll take the better player.

I'm all for returnees and guys sticking around, but SKJ is what he is. I'm not at all concerned with him.
 

shaolin style

All-Conference
Apr 16, 2009
2,527
3,428
0
@gracetoyou I have a feeling too many people skipped over your link. I think it clears up a lot of misconception on the Richards/SKJ debate.

We'll be fine without Junior SKJ.

 
Sep 27, 2015
16,154
27,225
98
So Wynyard, SKJ, Knox gone. That’s three. Likely SGA tonight for four

Washington (soft declared), Vanderbilt, Gabriel, Green the next question marks.

Really expect Richards to be here next year.

We replace three with Quickley, Johnson, Herro, and Montgomery so we can “absorb” one more among those listed above. Add in Hagans and we have two we “can lose”.... and I would expect we will since I’m counting SGA in that who is a sure bet.

It’s all starting to take some shape expect for the PF position
 

brianpoe

Heisman
Mar 25, 2009
27,769
21,825
113
The frustration from Richards starting despite poor played created a blind spot regarding SKJ's performance. SKJ was generally given benefit of the doubt because he wasn't bestowed with the title of "starter."




Let's all be honest for a moment.

Richards started for one reason and one reason only.

The same reason Dakari started over WCS in 2014.

Cal wanted/hell he needed a starting five of all freshmen to win it all and to shut everybody up.

All a ploy by Cal to aid in recruiting and boost his legacy that much more.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: CatColumbia

DelkBowl

Heisman
Oct 4, 2015
10,718
11,753
101
I dont mind EVERY player being over recruited, I'd like to have seen SKJ improve over the summer and fight for that Center spot. Give me a solid 7 footer over a 6'7 guy any day.

Alas, it wasnt in him.
6'7"?
 

*CatinIL*

Heisman
Jan 2, 2003
24,651
40,237
113
Bummer...he seemed to have taken some big strides in the second half of the season. We'll see how this works out.

Good luck SKJ
 

JDHoss

Heisman
Jan 1, 2003
16,516
40,147
113
I’m not sure I am following you. A reserve who averaged 3.3 points and 13 minutes a game is transferring. What’s the problem?

Pretty much.....SKJ averaged 3 points and 3 boards in 13.7 minutes. He shot 58% from the field, 56% from the line, had 19 blocks, 8 assists, 7 steals, 23 turnovers and committed 72 fouls.

He competes for PT with Richards, who.....averaged 5 points and 4 boards in 14.7 minutes. He shot 62% from the field and 72% from the line, had 33 blocks, 9 assists, 3 steals, 26 turnovers and committed 76 fouls.

Yet there are people here who act as though we've lost a key cog. I wish SKJ the best, but people need to really get a grip. [laughing]
 

SemperFiCat

Heisman
Mar 2, 2009
14,566
30,005
0
It's a fair point. But I'm just saying I know why Cal went in that direction. We got beat as soon as we faced a decent team because we had no JV and no NR. We depended on SKJ to play a lot of those minutes. And we flamed out.

He's simply not that good, at all. He's been at UK a while and little changed.

He's been recruited over. I'll take the better player.

I'm all for returnees and guys sticking around, but SKJ is what he is. I'm not at all concerned with him.
I agree with your point. Just not convinced NR will be anything better than what SKJ was giving us with far fewer min.
 
  • Like
Reactions: morgousky
Jul 9, 2004
93,075
38,060
0
Here's my first thought on this just from a fan of the basketball program. I'm not a fan of quitters. SKJ, you really had a chance to make a name for yourself next season. Now, you tuck tail and run.

Here's my thoughts on this from a basketball perspective for him. This is a great move. This is the, basically, redshirt year that he desperately needs. He can now work on his body. This kid greatly lacks strength. He can use this time to work strictly on gaining 10-15-20 pounds of muscle. I disagree that he doesn't have the talent to be here. It's the physical nature of the game he needs to address. If he doesn't start to do it during this next year, he will never realize his potential.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shaudylo

mdlUK.1

Heisman
Dec 23, 2002
29,712
57,543
0
Quit playing freshman ahead of soph's that dont deserve it ????
[roll]

I wish SKJ had stayed but he had done nothing until the SECT to justify more pt. If he was getting it done in practice, Cal would have play him. And SKJ is one example.
 

Dr. H Lecter

Heisman
Apr 5, 2007
15,267
30,183
66
SKJ played more minutes so who cares who "starts". The kid that's on the court more is more valued.

Maybe you've never played sports before. Everyone wants to be a starter. Coaches however BS everyone who comes off the bench into thinking that they are the 6th man starter...or that the 9th batter is just the additional leadoff batter or countless other coach-speak nonsense to make the reserves feel good about not starting.

Certainly we can all say...it aint who starts...its who finishes.... But that is game to game dependent on a lot of factors. At least, in this case, Richards started over a couple guys who were better than he is. Wenyan Gabriel first of all and then at times SKJ. Richards started IMO in order to create the youngest starting lineup in the country and to create that narrative. That narrative feeds the exit door too when you are a lightly used soph.
 
  • Like
Reactions: John Henry

JC43

All-Conference
Oct 6, 2006
3,807
2,956
0
*sigh*

I know SKJ wasn't the greatest player but I was excited to see how he would progress. It's not about losing one player it's just that this is the culture of the program now. If you're a 4 star recruit who takes some time to develop, don't go to Kentucky because 1) you'll be a failure if you aren't a one and done 2) you won't see the court because you'll get recruited over if you don't produce immediately.

Just disappointing and not a culture that's conducive to building a championship roster IMO
SKJ is a five star
 

JDHoss

Heisman
Jan 1, 2003
16,516
40,147
113
Why anyone who is not a top 15 recruit would want to play for Cal is beyond me. Unless you are an instant star like Alexander you know your are going to be recruited over and lose minutes to them.

I've got news for you. If you are playing any sport at the college level, coaches are always trying to recruit over you. If they aren't, they are on their way to being fired.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lady wildcat

CatCall

Senior
May 22, 2002
923
548
58
You don’t think this culture of “if I’m not a star after two years transfer or go pro somewhere” isn’t a negative thing??

Hard to decipher... so you're asking if this should be a positive stance for our players to take?
 

Jakarii

All-Conference
Jan 29, 2016
4,640
3,048
0
And fans need to realize kids want to play and if there is another place for them to play more then it makes sense to transfer. Seems to have worked out nicely for Mitchell and Wiltjer. Like Cal said “UK isn’t for everyone. THat doesn’t apply for just those who don’t pick UK


All these kids have to realize that there is nothing wrong with staying at a school for 4 years and developing...sometimes you are not very good
 
  • Like
Reactions: lady wildcat

WildMoon

Heisman
Apr 7, 2009
78,693
11,120
0
Hope Cal brings in Carey or Wiseman .

Don't really care too much about SKJ leaving.

Dude's efficiency dropped like mofo after his freshman year. He obviously didn't put his time in the gym and get better .

Btw NR's Per was almost 20 and SKJ was almost 13.