Sitkowski
- Thread starter redlinehw
- Start date
Of course. If vedral plays tonight maybe we win. Schiano said before game that not having vedral was a loss. None of our qbs Are good but vedral can makes things happen with this offense. The art experiment is over people. Need a new QBs.
Certainly a direct message being sent by the staff to Art..”You’re not our guy”
Interesting fan base. The defense gives up over 600 yards, and they blame the game on the quarterback. Can’t argue with that kind of analysis
Part of the defense’s collapse is directly attributable to the lack of time the offense spent on the field. Did you see the TOP differential?
I’m not defending him playing over Vedral, but the weather definitely impacted Sit’s game today. It’s unfair to judge this performance without that caveat. He’s not a runner. Gripping the ball in frigid temps was going to be a factor for him throwing the ball and he’s not a threat to run. He didn’t handle it well.
Well you’re not going to win many games with 209 yards of offense.
Don't put me in that group. I've agreed with the decision to start Vedral all year.
Don't put me in that group. I've agreed with the decision to start Vedral all year.
You need offense to keep the defense off the field.
Nebraska had ball for 39.31 minutes, and Rutgers time of possession was 20.29.
Nebraska had ball twice as much as Rutgers. That will kill most defenses
Interesting comment. Rutgers' offense time of possession 20:29. Defense has 4 turnovers. Offense is 2-13 on 3rd downs and 9 first downs. Mutliple best players on defense injured. How is losing not the offense's fault and the poor QB play?
You can see Fogg was playing at 50%. Tough kid for gutting it out.
Great kid. Nobody will ever question his work ethic, attitude or dedication to RU. But like another QB moved to TE, not going to make it in the P5 as a starter.
He's my fav player on this team. Plays smart, shows-up all over the field and arrives with attitude and ability. Plus a great name for a LB. He's as close to Thompson as anybody I've seen since 2006
The sad thing was this game WAS there for the taking. One drive away..and they put a new qb in which ends in a TO. It was the wrong decision. Art shoulda stayed in at the end
You have to be freaking kidding me with turnover. Do you understand the concept of a surrender turnover? Ray Lucas nailed it in the booth.
In at least two press conferences, Schiano brought up Cole Snyder without being prompted about him specifically. It's a shame he got zero reps this season.
Why would you say that? In his only action as a true freshman, he went 3/3 and looked very competent. Dumb reply for you.
The future QB clearly is not on this roster. Let’s just hope they find even a placeholder who is competent
sorry on third down when we have the best punter in the league we don’t need a “surrender turnover” we need a first down. Let our punter do his job on 4th down. That play was horrible.
Exactly. You don’t “surrender” on 3rd down by heaving it up. If it was 4th..sure. He wanted to “surrender”..he takes sack or throws away there
And still he rode pine behind Vedral, Sitkowski, and Langan. In a year where everyone keeps the year of eligibility.
How many 3rd and 4th string QBs have kicked Rutgers' ***? Langan has a role. We learned tonight why Vedral was the starter all year. Sitkowski probably got the nod over Snyder and Simon because of his experience and their lack of experience.
I don't have any inside info, and I am glad he stayed, despite the result we saw this year.