Sincere coment about SEC bias requested

[ugabully]

I was an SEC-bias denialist all season and would feel a mixture of anger and pity for anyone trying to make the case that the SEC was overrated.

Now, obviously, I wonder about other years when SEC teams got more credit than they deserved.

What BCS era non-SEC teams probably deserved more of shot than they got?

 

[msstate7]

Last year Michigan state was very good.

 

[Macthebulldogfan]

Don't roast me when I say this. But the year Auburn went undefeated and didn't get to play for the title. I know you said non SEC. But I always thought they got shafted.

 

[Old Fart Dawg]

I did too. But the way Southern Cal roasted Oklahoma that night, Aubie is prolly secretly glad they missed a beatdown

 

[Sutterkane]

The year LSU and Bama rematched, there's no way bama deserved to play in that game. Don't give a 17 what the score was in it, they did not deserve to be there. Okie State or Stanford should've been in that game vs LSU.

 

[Sutterkane]

After seeing the numerous chokes from Oklahoma, I don't feel like it would've been a beatdown. Auburn was damn good that year.

 

[121Josey]

Yep. LSU deserved to win the NC that year.

 

[WayboDawg]

Take your pick:

2003 USC Trojans
2004 Cal Bears
2004 Texas Longhorns
2006 Michigan
2008 Texas Longhorns
2008 Texas Tech

etc. etc. etc......

The two team method really sucked most years for at least 1 team (sometimes 2 or even 3). It would have been cool to see how good some of those undefeated Non-AQ teams like Boise State, Utah, or pre-Big 2 TCU actually were in a playoff. I think that 2010 TCU team that won the Rose Bowl could have won it all personally.

 

[THE Bruce Dickinson]

Kansas state in 1998 was really good. Lost in double OT to A&M in the big 12 championship game. I thought they were the best team that year