Well I think I answered that question also. I’d rather anything in the NCAA than anything NIT.
I was on enough teams growing up that won sportsmanship awards.
I get you, for sure, and understand your sentiment.
Just for grins, I asked AI, It seems to have some kind of answer for any question.
Kentucky fans generally hold an "NCAA title or bust" mentality, often viewing anything less as a disappointment, though a 60-point loss is a historic embarrassment that would likely be viewed worse than a consolation tournament win. While the NIT is considered a lower-tier "consolation" event, Kentucky has won it twice and fans expect high-level performance regardless of the tournament.
Key Perspectives:
- Expectations: The expectation is to compete for a National Championship every year.
- NIT Value: While considered a "consolation" tournament, winning it is still seen as a positive outcome for a season that didn't go as planned.
- The "60-point loss" Factor: Such a massive loss in the NCAA Tournament would be considered a historic embarrassment for the program, which is often considered worse than winning a lower-tier championship.
Ultimately, most fans would likely prefer a "successful" end to a bad season (winning the NIT) over the national humiliation of a record-setting blowout loss in the NCAA Tournament. Based on historical precedent, Kentucky would likely accept an NIT invitation. The school has historically viewed it as a valuable opportunity for postseason experience and player development, especially with younger teams. Past instances in 2009 and 2013 showed the program accepting bids. Kentucky (22-14) went 2-1 in 2009 and went 0-1 in 2013, losing to Robert Morris to finish 21-12.
www.bigbluehistory.com
www.bigbluehistory.com