Nothing about the ultimate solution was "equitable" - pretty much every aspect of the agreement benefited SHU at the expense of Rutgers.
What did SHU get:
- Avoided a home game in front of no fans
- Avoided what had a higher probability than recent history of being a loss
- Got a likely sellout home game in the year fans were allowed back in arenas
What did SHU lose:
- Nothing
What did RU get:
- Nothing. A game was added on the end of a series that was almost certainly going to be extended anyway.
What did RU lose:
- A Q1 game in a year where they were vying for a tournament berth
- A game with a higher probability of a road win than they've had in recent history
It was in SHU's best interests to beg off on the game for last year, and in RU's best interests to play it. SHU got what it wanted, and RU didn't. RU didn't even get a commitment for a ticket allotment for this season, or a commitment to open the upper deck for the game.
What did SHU get? - A home game delayed by 1 year.
What did SHU lose? - A Q1 game in a year where they were vying for a tournament berth.
What did RU get? - A home game delayed by 1 year.
What did RU lose? - A Q1 game in a year where they were vying for a tournament berth.
You should know team records often mean nothing for this game. And having finished on the wrong side of bubble, missing out on that opportunity may have hurt SHU more than RU. What does a win over SHU really gain RU for the tournament? A potential second round against a 1 seed instead of the weakest 2 seed in the field? Even if they stay on the 10 line, their 2nd round opponent gets harder, not easier.