Session resigns
- Thread starter rog1187
- Start date
Someone do the research for me, I'm too lazy. I'd love to have the reactions of these guys blasting Sessions and praising his resignation (firing) now and what they said when he was nominated and got the job......I'm sure they hated him then, too......
opcorn:
I never get tired of pointing out your ignorant logic. Hope you never change.Someone do the research for me, I'm too lazy. I'd love to have the reactions of these guys blasting Sessions and praising his resignation (firing) now and what they said when he was nominated and got the job......I'm sure they hated him then, too......
When he was nominated, he wasn’t recused. We became frustrated after his recusal. He should have resigned instead of recused himself. It would have been better for the administration and party.
So, there's #1 of the "Session's fan club when he was with Trump".........thanks!
Ummmmm, did you see where I’ve commented one way or the other on his resignation?
More failed logic. Wanna go for a threepeat?
Jeff Sessions served our nation well and honorably as Attorney General.
He has dedicated his whole life to conservatism and upholding the Rule of Law. (1/3)
— Lindsey Graham (@LindseyGrahamSC) November 7, 2018
This statement is as truthful as me saying I joined the USAF as a pilot and spent my 4 years working in the chow hall...
He has dedicated his whole life to conservatism and upholding the Rule of Law. (1/3)
— Lindsey Graham (@LindseyGrahamSC) November 7, 2018
This statement is as truthful as me saying I joined the USAF as a pilot and spent my 4 years working in the chow hall...
Yes because only role of the attorney general is to cover Biff’s fat ***. Talk about faulty logic.
No, it’s to maintain complete authority over his department. Talk about faulty logic.
Different administration clown...BIGLY ..Oh,and in case you missed it being "actually reported" a judge last week gave your "Queen of the Damned" some VERY bad news concerning her Benghazi trial...loooks like there's gonna be a "do-over"
opcorn::cool2::flush:How about your 57,000 homies covering the "pantsuit in charge"? Pleaae keep on the the mockingbird rehetoric...it's so refreshing in these turbulent times..
You can’t admit that there was an overlap with this investigation, and that a Presidential appointed position shouldn’t have been in total control?
Uhhh, why not? Your assumption is that the president did something wrong. There's much more evidence of the DOJ doing something wrong at this point, than the president.
What are you attempting to say but lack the verbal skills to do so in understandable English?It's fascinating to watch the reddest of all red GOP senators just get crushed by Trumpers.
Material supplied by Rosenstein and his fellow Obama followers. Add to it Sessions too (whatever you wish to use--ignorant or stupid, or gullible or....) to not recognize the statute did not apply!
What kind of comment would you expect from someone so biased and unwilling to deal with truth as Cryin Chuck? Obvious he has something to hide" Everbody and his brother have been trying to find a 'crime' for the past 2 years and have come up empty. If he has something to hide, it is even MORE obvious that the man is ultra talented to carrying out his plan. WOW, He really deserves even more credit than all his ,oat fervent supporters have been willing to acknowledge.
Did any one notice if 10 or so guys just landed from Iran and entered behind him? If he does not exit in a decent amount of time we may want to begin searching for secure tapes of what transpired!
You and logic are complete strangers.
The post you responded to had nothing to do with Trump. We were discussing Sessions and you poor logic. Stay on point.
Of course I can, hence the fact I said that he should have resigned at the point when it became clear he would need to recuse himself.
There has been zero evidence of Trump collusion thus far. There is certainly mounds of evidence of DOJ wrongdoing. Sessions was unable to deal with any of it.
Why do you think the left is fighting so hard to keep them from being brought to light? Honestly asking what would make sense in your mind. Keep in mind, WSJ has had them since 2017.
Zero evidence? How do you know? Investigations (until completed) don't usually reveal all the findings while it is still GOING ON. Duh! And before you say anything, I'm not a fan of the investigation mainly because nothing will come of it even if they found something. I think Trump is dirty as Hell, but he's covered his tracks well enough.
You just can’t help it. Clearly I was talking about anything being reported. You guys discounting that fact and completely overlooking the very real and publicly disclosed abuses within the FBI and DOJ are hilarious.