Literally every single person I've seen post on this board also agrees with this. Feels like when I listen to the actual words of democrats that are quoted (not republican interpretation of their words or motivations), they also agree with me.
Anyone breaking the law should be held to that law. I think the issue you're overlooking is that disregarding the laws surrounding immigration and due process is also breaking the law. You keep brushing it aside by using catch phrases like will of the people and landside or voted for it, but that is not how the law works. Biden wasn't allowed to wipe out whatever debt he liked just because the people voted for him in a landslide. Congress had no requirement to spend money the way he wanted, and the courts had no requirement to listen to his decree because he won in an overwhelming landslide.
How do you respond to BIDEN IGNORED THE LAW BY LETTING THEM IN?
Namely that IF TRUE THAT SHOULD'VE ALSO GONE TO COURT, BUT DOESN'T CHANGE ANY DUE PROCESS LAWS
So great, I also don't think Biden did a good job with the border. We agree. That that somehow means that anything goes from there isn't a law, its a school yard feeling.
OK - what do you suggest the repercussions be?
Do you have suggestions other than tearing down one of the founding principles of due process? I am fully behind working for immigration reform. I think it should be both easier to immigrate here legally, but harder to come here illegally. I think we should put more money into immigration period, both enforcement and especially the judges, courts, processing man power to handle it well. If as much money is lost to services once they're here, this would pay for itself long term.
Democrats tore down due process by letting illegals into our country illegally. You can't but the genie back in the bottle no matter how bad you want to. This lies at their feet for thinking they could get away with it. They LIED to you telling you it couldn't be stopped.
So your consequence for doing a poor job on an issue is the other side gets to do just whatever they want. There was a consequence. It was losing the next election. And if they broke any laws, the current administration can begin prosecuting. That is how it works in a constitutional republic. I thought the Trump administration did a horrible job with its Covid branding. But I didn't then believe that the Biden administration got to do whatever they wanted, have cops go around keeping people in their homes if they had a cough, etc. They had the legal ability to do some things, require some things for federal employees etc. Republicans disagreed with a lot, protested, filed lawsuits, flouted some rules set, etc. At no point was I thinking, Trump handled things poorly so therefore Biden gets to do whatever the F he wants and those are the consequences, the Trump administration has to be held accountable. I didn't, because its nonsensical. The consequences are they lost the election. If they broke laws, there can be lawsuits and prosecutions now. The "consequences" can't be disregarding the constitution moving forward.
That's not how any of it works, but you know that and you're just trolling.
Your premise is wrong.
That changes absolutely nothing. There is no degree of incompetence that removes the constitution.
ANd that's why the voters held them accountable.
Well...he's ridiculous and dumb soooooo
It's a national emergency created by Democrats and we are not going to take 50 years to fix it.
Reminds me of a lot of Christians who like to overlook things in their book/document when they aren't convenient.
Sorry, Biden did a poor job at the border so anything ICE does is allowable and the fault of democrats.
Would disagree with that if that is truly how it went down. I would be highly dissappointed.
I will point out, democrat egregiously violated the constitution and free speech. They did it in hidden fashion.
They probably did. Every president has likely created an executive order, had their DOJ do something, etc that was brought to court and then found to be in violation of the constitution or a previous law, etc.
Pretty rich from a party that some believe tipped the election by running Kamala is for they/them ads 24 hours a day during the campaign.
Two things can be true so can we agree that Biden managed the border badly AND we need to confirm we aren't deporting people who are here legally? We get it that it requires an extra step but we also know the numbers are no where close to what right-wing media claims, so the best option is to adjudicate these cases as quickly as possible - if that means temporarily adding 1000 judges to make sure we get it right, so be it. As the world's superpower, that's what we need to do.
