SEC

SLOHusker

Sophomore
Aug 7, 2001
2,740
123
0
In 2010 we could have gone to the SEC and they would have been glad to have us. Instead of road games in cold, windy places it would have been bayou shrimp and cocktail parties.
 

steinek11

All-Conference
Apr 18, 2004
13,494
1,234
113
In 2010 we could have gone to the SEC and they would have been glad to have us. Instead of road games in cold, windy places it would have been bayou shrimp and cocktail parties.
I think the rule is that you have to have fought for the Confederates in the civil war to be in the SEC. Back then, Nebraska was just a territory.
 

redwine65

All-Conference
Jun 23, 2010
10,846
2,162
113
I think the rule is that you have to have fought for the Confederates in the civil war to be in the SEC. Back then, Nebraska was just a territory.
at one time lincoln backed the confederates (south platters), omaha was union (north platters)......there a dirt road in nebraska that marked the border. between them..I forgot the name.

A last-ditch attempt to steer Democrats living south of the river to vote against the bill came from Omaha Senator J. N. H. Patrick, who attempted to revive Civil War hatreds by amending the bill to remove the name “Capital City” and replace it with “Lincoln” (for Abraham Lincoln). Senator Patrick assumed that the people living south of the Platte River, nearer to Kansas, would still have very strong feelings against Abraham Lincoln, and would have the capitol stay in Omaha rather than have a capital named after President Lincoln. But Senator Patrick’s “trick” failed. People living south of the Platte River were happy to have the new capital city in their part of the state, even with the name “Lincoln".

this is the first buildings of the city known as lincoln ne. today


 
Last edited:

Jaemekon

Senior
Apr 23, 2007
26,164
625
113
It sucks for sure, I've never liked the big ten. The SEC would have been a much better fit.
 

Hawk4Life

Senior
Iowa Swarm member
Sep 11, 2018
623
970
93
Unfortunately, I'm not sure our record would be any better, maybe worse!
 
Jan 3, 2004
3,197
609
0
at one time lincoln backed the confederates (south platters), omaha was union (north platters)......there a dirt road in nebraska that marked the border. between them..I forgot the name.

A last-ditch attempt to steer Democrats living south of the river to vote against the bill came from Omaha Senator J. N. H. Patrick, who attempted to revive Civil War hatreds by amending the bill to remove the name “Capital City” and replace it with “Lincoln” (for Abraham Lincoln). Senator Patrick assumed that the people living south of the Platte River, nearer to Kansas, would still have very strong feelings against Abraham Lincoln, and would have the capitol stay in Omaha rather than have a capital named after President Lincoln. But Senator Patrick’s “trick” failed. People living south of the Platte River were happy to have the new capital city in their part of the state, even with the name “Lincoln".

this is the first buildings of the city known as lincoln ne. today


Blame the Kansas-Nebraska act! Not exclusively our fault. Kansas and Kansas State on the other hand...
 

redwine65

All-Conference
Jun 23, 2010
10,846
2,162
113
Blame the Kansas-Nebraska act! Not exclusively our fault. Kansas and Kansas State on the other hand...
I would of been ok with kansas getting everything south of the platte, if us north platters got everything up to the canada border.

imaging how much more a hunting fishing license would be worth...(of course the Huskers would have to be in a town north of the platte)
according to this if oklahoma get returned to the indians, we might get alot bigger state!
 
Last edited: