You make some very good points, but TAM was second in the league, second in the SEC tourney and was a 7-seed in the NCAA. ARK was 8-10 in the league.Yes & No IMO.
It is very Top heavy though.
1. Alabama - clearly the best in the league
2. Tennessee - Had they been full strength, they could be in the E8.
3. Kentucky - Biggest wins of the year were sweeping Tennessee (Beat #5 Duke) and blasting Arkansas (Beat #1 Kansas)
4. Arkansas - Really good just couldn't put it all together.
5. Mizzou - Had good talent, just not good enough
5a. Vanderbilt - Got hot at the end but their lackluster 1st half of the season was horrible.
I think we had 3 too many bids. 5 should have been the ceiling IMO.
UK & UT was overseeded. UK should have been a 7, UT should have been a 6.
Auburn and TAMU should have not gotten in.
How the heck you justify not including TAMU? They finished the SEC regular season with 3 or 4 losses and 2nd overall. Granted, they laid an egg in the tournament but you can't overlook their record.Yes & No IMO.
It is very Top heavy though.
1. Alabama - clearly the best in the league
2. Tennessee - Had they been full strength, they could be in the E8.
3. Kentucky - Biggest wins of the year were sweeping Tennessee (Beat #5 Duke) and blasting Arkansas (Beat #1 Kansas)
4. Arkansas - Really good just couldn't put it all together.
5. Mizzou - Had good talent, just not good enough
5a. Vanderbilt - Got hot at the end but their lackluster 1st half of the season was horrible.
I think we had 3 too many bids. 5 should have been the ceiling IMO.
UK & UT was overseeded. UK should have been a 7, UT should have been a 6.
Auburn and TAMU should have not gotten in.
Agree with you, some on here we're bragging about how strong the league was.Sec is a football conference basketball is a thing of the past
Just hard for some to accept how bad ky has becomeAgree with you, some on here we're bragging about how strong the league was.