I can separate it. Look at some of the scores of some of those games in their championship year then look at some of his scores for us against Wisconsin. Some OCs abused Bo’s defenses when he didn’t have a guy like Suh.
He failed horribly his last go round at LSU as well. I hope he has a good life going now. I really do but I think he was an average at best college DC. The flip side of that is that I think he hired OCs who deserved more credit than they got for the wins we got.
So you wanna look at the scores of him vs the 3,4 games he lost every year as opposed to the 9 or 10 he won? Is that not selective?
We don't wanna look at him at him and his record as a while? Just the Wisconsin or OSU games?
Honestly as a whole I generally don't care what he did when he wasn't at Nebraska. For the most part it's irrelevant.
You can micro scope him if you wanna find holes in his game. My point is do that with everyone Don't make it just Bo
Want an example? Go back and view Tim Osbornes record before the mid 99s vs teams who had equal or better talent. Guarantee you it'll knock some shine off of what you remember.
I judge the big picture. Say what you want about Bo. Blame it in lack of competition or whatever but the numbers don't lie. He won at a clip that Nebraska hasn't seen since TO. He won 9 games with the 08 team and that was one of the best coaching years I've seen at Nebraska since maybe this year so far. That dude was definitely better than an average coach AT NEBRASKA.
I'll pretty much die on that hill. I'm ok if most don't agree for whatever reasons. Just remember when u do disagree u set precedence that every coach before and after have to live by.
Holla