SAC all CONFERENCE
- Thread starter rcoraider98
- Start date
Kyler Davis is the player of the year. Don't understand the snub. The numbers don't lie. Led league in passing and total yards. 2nd in passing and top 10 in rushing for regular season. If you count post season it adds to it.
What a big joke! This all-conference team must have been picked at random. Seriously?? You have the Raiders conf. champs, not to mention only lost 2 games, 71st East Reg. runner-ups, Scots State Champs runner-ups, and you going to tell me not one of those teams didn't have one player better than a player on a legitament 3-8 team?? Come on man!
Not taking anything away from the other players but come on guys. These coaches pick and vote for players of the year and just because he comes from a team with a losing record doesnt mean the kid is non deserving. Hell the guy had 2 on him most of the time and never left the field. I'm happy for the kid and not mad at all with him getting it. Kudos for the coaches for not being bias like some of you. Glad to see someone else besides the regular teams getting some publicity.
Not taking anything away from the other players but come on guys. These coaches pick and vote for players of the year and just because he comes from a team with a losing record doesnt mean the kid is non deserving. Hell the guy had 2 on him most of the time and never left the field. I'm happy for the kid and not mad at all with him getting it. Kudos for the coaches for not being bias like some of you. Glad to see someone else besides the regular teams getting some publicity.
losing record doesnt take away the fact that this kid got doubled and never left the field. Kudos to the coaches who voted and were unbiased like some of you and voted for a kid from out of the regular knit of top teams. Good for them and well deserved Brayboy.
Think these all conf teams are largely a joke but dont know enough about the SAC to speak to individual kids. I did notice this year that the IMeck coaches left a 4star kid off the team because of his terrible antics on the field. Thought that was a valuable message sent.
When you have a player who leads the conference in passing, total yards, punting and 6 in rushing as a qb and threw to the conference leading receiver...what more do you have to do.
Ok then, why not then put players on the team that were back ups....just because they didn't start doesn't mean they are not deserving.
I think regular season only but I'm not sure. Does anyone know the non-conference schedules for any SAC teams?