Rutgers NIL needs you....NOW

RU#1fan

Heisman
Mar 7, 2003
23,747
12,425
113
Yeah - what a sucker
He wants to donate money to potentially see a winner
****, he even posts on message boards with fellow fans

I bet he even goes to games - maybe he goes a few hours before, throws some burgers on the grill and has a few beers with his buddies, hoping for a competitive game and even a win

What a ****ing loser
This
The only loser is Bullwinkle Moose
 

RUAldo

All-Conference
Sep 11, 2008
5,100
3,638
113
They have the opportunity to pursue an education.
I know they have the opportunity to pursue an education but without football many of them would NOT be pursuing it at Rutgers or any other fine institutions. Football is their ticket to a great education and now we are supposed to pay them to enroll on top of granting them admission and a schollie? This whole NIL nonsense is going to kill college football. The superstars are simply going to sign with the highest bidder and coach, team, facilities, education, etc. will be mostly meaningless.
 
Last edited:

Doctor Worm

Heisman
Feb 7, 2002
30,792
22,632
113
I know they have the opportunity to pursue an education but without football many of them would NOT be pursuing it at Rutgers or any other fine institutions. Football is their ticket to a great education and now we are supposed to pay them to enroll on top of granting them admission and a schollie. This whole NIL nonsense is going to kill college football. The superstars are simply going to sign with the highest bidder and coach, team, facilities, education, etc. will be mostly meaningless.
Your premise is incorrect. We are NOT "supposed to pay them to enroll on top of granting them admission and a schollie". Rutgers, like most D1 schools, is not using NIL for upfront payments to incoming recruits.
 

angmo

All-Conference
Jul 24, 2017
2,142
2,321
113
When first proposed it was framed as universities make all this money off the student athletes and they should get their fare share. So why doesn't the university just pay them from the big piles of loot they're making? Why hit the fans up?

Then it was let them make money for lending out their likeness for local ads.

Now it's just give us money so we can pay some kid to come here. Are these even tax deductible? You're essentially paying someone a salary.
 

RUBOB72

All-American
Aug 5, 2004
23,385
7,924
0
Your premise is incorrect. We are NOT "supposed to pay them to enroll on top of granting them admission and a schollie". Rutgers, like most D1 schools, is not using NIL for upfront payments to incoming recruits.
You don’t believe other schools are not or will not be financially procuring highly rated players?
 

RUBOB72

All-American
Aug 5, 2004
23,385
7,924
0
When first proposed it was framed as universities make all this money off the student athletes and they should get their fare share. So why doesn't the university just pay them from the big piles of loot they're making? Why hit the fans up?

Then it was let them make money for lending out their likeness for local ads.

Now it's just give us money so we can pay some kid to come here. Are these even tax deductible? You're essentially paying someone a salary.
You will need additional finance people in the institutional control department . Who is watching the hen house?
 
  • Like
Reactions: angmo

RUScrew85

Heisman
Nov 7, 2003
30,054
16,939
0
I know they have the opportunity to pursue an education but without football many of them would NOT be pursuing it at Rutgers or any other fine institutions. Football is their ticket to a great education and now we are supposed to pay them to enroll on top of granting them admission and a schollie. This whole NIL nonsense is going to kill college football. The superstars are simply going to sign with the highest bidder and coach, team, facilities, education, etc. will be mostly meaningless.

NFL minor league football. And the NFL gets it for free. WE get to pay for it for them. Nah. Not me.
 

RUAldo

All-Conference
Sep 11, 2008
5,100
3,638
113
Your premise is incorrect. We are NOT "supposed to pay them to enroll on top of granting them admission and a schollie". Rutgers, like most D1 schools, is not using NIL for upfront payments to incoming recruits.
Yeah you lost me. My point is that these football players are lucky to get the opportunity to play at schools like Rutgers because most of them wouldn’t be going to any top universities without football - their grades/scores alone wouldn’t cut it. So, we let them in for free to play football but now that’s not enough. On top of admission they otherwise would not be granted, and a free ride, they want to get paid. No thanks…
 

RobertG

Heisman
Jul 25, 2001
13,306
12,523
113
I'm really not sure what the arguments are here.

The NIL is here, it's not going away.
It's being used to pay college football players.
Either we, the Rutgers community step up, and Rutgers become competitive or Rutgers loses.
It's pretty simple.
 

RUScrew85

Heisman
Nov 7, 2003
30,054
16,939
0
I'm really not sure what the arguments are here.

The NIL is here, it's not going away.
It's being used to pay college football players.
Either we, the Rutgers community step up, and Rutgers become competitive or Rutgers loses.
It's pretty simple.

What happens when we pay and the kid gets better then leaves after one year for a bigger NIL?
You want to pay to be Pedd State's minor league team?
Not so simple now.

Oh and how much are you in for, because I've been paying for about 30 years and that wasn't enough apparently.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bac2therac

RobertG

Heisman
Jul 25, 2001
13,306
12,523
113
What happens when we pay and the kid gets better then leaves after one year for a bigger NIL?
You want to pay to be Pedd State's minor league team?
Not so simple now.

Oh and how much are you in for, because I've been paying for about 30 years and that wasn't enough apparently.
No still the same simple calculus, either we raise enough money to complete or we lose.

This is no more about getting the Trustees to make the right decision on a coach or getting the right AD, the landscape has shifted, it's about the money to the players.

Just redirect your money. Less money to the athletic dept. and more money to KTR. The players are going to be less worried about the facilities and will care more about the direct payments so send you money to KTR.
 

eddynyse_anon

Junior
Nov 16, 2003
1,007
377
0
When teams (schools) drop out of the arms race altogether, the kids who would have received a college education at those schools will be harmed. And it is going to happen.
Good point. I also wonder if the schools that can't compete in obtaining good NIL deals for players AND aren't part of a major conference will simply drop out all together from college football, which will hurt the student athletes since they will have less opportunities to compete and get an education.

We are so fortunate to be part of the B10!
 

LETSGORU91_

All-American
Jan 29, 2017
6,500
7,245
0
People here are not going to put in money into NIL, saying that “that is not college football.” But will complain when other B10 programs have the fans who will put the money into their NIL funding and get the players that “would’ve gone to Rutgers if the players were not all for the money.”

But some of the same fans will have no problem putting money into Schiano’s extension or whatever it takes to keep him here.
Win, lose or draw. Coaches salaries and now player salaries are a waste of $$. The greed is disgusting from both sides.
It was meant for the general audience, say he got $5-8 mil per year to pay players from a bunch of working class stiffs does he still get year after year of free passes for producing losing teams on the field under the guise of the forever rebuild, or is he held accountable for the results on the field, i.e., if he has another bad year his *** is on the hot seat, two and he is out?
Greg is in a no win situation at this point IMO. Why do you think he is begging for donations? Answer: Mr. Hot Shot, high school recruit thinks he should not only receive a free education/housing/etc., but now thinks we should give him money to represent Rutgersas well. NIL is not about name, image and likeness...its "give me money" at this point and its being abused. @Geo_Baker_1 (is this him?) has been pretty quiet since NIL has blown up and is getting out of control. What say you Geo at this point? NIL is beyond f*+cked up and will only get worse.
 
Last edited:

RUScrew85

Heisman
Nov 7, 2003
30,054
16,939
0
No still the same simple calculus, either we raise enough money to complete or we lose.

This is no more about getting the Trustees to make the right decision on a coach or getting the right AD, the landscape has shifted, it's about the money to the players.

Just redirect your money. Less money to the athletic dept. and more money to KTR. The players are going to be less worried about the facilities and will care more about the direct payments so send you money to KTR.

Nah. NIL with the new transfer lack of rules - it's a whole new ballgame - not the same calculus. Enjoy the free one year of Rutgers Education before you transfer out fellas. Nice NOT getting to know ya'll.
 
Last edited:

eddynyse_anon

Junior
Nov 16, 2003
1,007
377
0
Even if magically got every season ticket holder to donate $1,200 you still not going to be a title contender. Likely you are just going to spend $1,200 more for the same product because every other school is doing the same thing. It a losing proposition.
I disagree with this. Per last year we had 20,000+ season ticket holders. if 10k+ contribute the hypothetical amount that would be 12Mil +. Add to that the additional contribution for non-season ticket holders and corporate sponsors and you are probably looking at $15-20Mil per year.

Below is the link to the total season tickets sales from last year.

I think NIL will give us a better chance than what we had in the past. Before it was an issue of RU not being cool/sexy enough, not having the tradition, or booster who were willing to do shady things to get a player to commit. Now all that WE have to do is raised the $$$$ using the current legal methods. We don't need to be 1 to compete, just be in the top 15-25 and be good at player evaluation and development.

I do think NIL is not going to be good long term for the bottom 10-20% of the players who might not have a school to attend to when in the past they could at least get a free education.

 
  • Like
Reactions: Ruthinking

Knight177lb

All-Conference
Sep 2, 2014
1,372
1,350
113
I wish that players could just be limited to scholarships. I wish that every team did that, but they don't. Everyone else is going to pay as much as their fans could afford. This is the reality we live in now. We're not going to get good players unless we can pay them well. If we don't get good players, we won't be competitive. Face reality and join.
 

RUhasarrived

All-Conference
May 7, 2007
8,035
2,037
0
Simply put you need 10,000 people to write a check for $1,000 every year and then you have to pray to God that Penn State, Ohio State, Michigan, Michigan State, Indiana, and Maryland don't each find 10,000 people to write a check for $2,000 every year. You see where this is going and why most Rutgers alumni and fans aren't that stupid to invest in this craziness, it is a no win scenario, there will always be multiple teams in our division, let alone conference, that will easily be able to out raise us 2, 3, 4, maybe even 5 to 1. My recommendation, save your money on football and invest in basketball where two or three kids can make a difference and we have a real chance to actually be relevant on a national level.
Why should people donate to basketball if they won't let you go to the games?
 

AZBlues

All-Conference
Sep 29, 2013
1,185
1,389
0
I wish that players could just be limited to scholarships. I wish that every team did that, but they don't. Everyone else is going to pay as much as their fans could afford. This is the reality we live in now. We're not going to get good players unless we can pay them well. If we don't get good players, we won't be competitive. Face reality and join.
Face reality and join, or face reality and don't join... But either way, there's nothing wrong with sticking to our principles and making the decision based on our own ethical beliefs and values...
 

Knight177lb

All-Conference
Sep 2, 2014
1,372
1,350
113
Face reality and join, or face reality and don't join... But either way, there's nothing wrong with sticking to our principles and making the decision based on our own ethical beliefs and values...

Sticking to principles is great, but this is an unusual situation. Like I said, I wish all college athletes were limited to scholarships only. I always thought it would have been great if there was a minor football league just like there is in baseball. I wish HS players could have a choice to go play in the minors and earn a little money or put off going pro a little and go to college on a scholarship.

That minor league never happened and NIL is what we're dealing with now, no matter what you believe is right or wrong. I personally believe college athletes should not get paid. I don't want the player to receive my money for playing in college, but if we don't join, we're pissing away a huge opportunity. Everyone else is paying and if we don't pay, you can kiss the Big Ten goodbye along with that revenue and your school will disappear into oblivion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Plum Street

Plum Street

Heisman
Jun 21, 2009
27,306
23,010
0
What happens when we pay and the kid gets better then leaves after one year for a bigger NIL?
You want to pay to be Pedd State's minor league team?
Not so simple now.

Oh and how much are you in for, because I've been paying for about 30 years and that wasn't enough apparently.
So what are you going to do now ? I am seriously interested to know what this fandom looks like .
 

tico brown

Heisman
Oct 16, 2005
44,205
14,212
93
So what are you going to do now ? I am seriously interested to know what this fandom looks like .
The fandom you talk about will only support Rutgers if it treats its players like it’s in the Patriot League while collecting those B10 checks.
 

rurichdog

Heisman
Sep 30, 2006
116,807
14,390
0
I see this happening as well. School will push funds that usually went to facilities to the players, which I don't think is a bad thing.
Right. I'll be waiting by the mailbox for the letter from Rutgers Athletics telling me they dropped ticket prices by $20 each and I'm no longer required to pay a mandatory minimum donation, in hopes that I direct that money to the Pay Our Players collective.
 

Geo_Baker_1

All-Conference
Apr 1, 2022
331
3,231
71
Win, lose or draw. Coaches salaries and now player salaries are a waste of $$. The greed is disgusting from both sides.

Greg is in a no win situation at this point IMO. Why do you think he is begging for donations? Answer: Mr. Hot Shot, high school recruit thinks he should not only receive a free education/housing/etc., but now thinks we should give him money to represent Rutgersas well. NIL is not about name, image and likeness...its "give me money" at this point and its being abused. @Geo_Baker_1 (is this him?) has been pretty quiet since NIL has blow up and went out of control. What say you Geo at this point? NIL is beyond f*+cked up and will only get worse.
Rutgers basketball lands their best recruit in years. Kids all over the country are returning to school to get a better education instead of leaving early. (Caleb McConnell included). Rutgers football head coach comes out and says WORD FOR WORD what I’ve been saying all along. People were cheating before and they’re cheating now. What WE can do at Rutgers is build a strong *** community built on fan experiences, interactions and networking. That’s what we are building at https://knightsociety.io/ i recommend you join our wait list! You don’t want to pool together money for athletes? Great, me neither. All members in knight society are going to get the fan experience of a lifetime. athletes will get a chance to interact and network with their biggest supporters like no other school gets. So no, it won’t be millions of dollars. But the experience that athletes will get from this could be worth millions in the future and that’s what we’re aiming for to start.

College sports has and always will be a business. I find it interesting that you are only upset once the athletes take part in that business. Tens of Thousands of lives are going to change because of NIL. Sure it’s been ugly at times but there’s also been twice as many beautiful stories to come from it too. Instead of complaining let’s think of ways that we would want to utilize a players NIL. What’s valuable to you? Maybe a 30 minute phone call from your favorite player? Watching a basketball game with your favorite player? Or football game? Having an athlete show up to your kid or grandkids birthday party? Video games? And maybe you don’t want any of this which is fine but that is all stuff that would be valuable to super fans. More creativity, less complaining.
 
Jun 7, 2001
36,442
43,797
113
I disagree with this. Per last year we had 20,000+ season ticket holders. if 10k+ contribute the hypothetical amount that would be 12Mil +. Add to that the additional contribution for non-season ticket holders and corporate sponsors and you are probably looking at $15-20Mil per year.

Below is the link to the total season tickets sales from last year.

I think NIL will give us a better chance than what we had in the past. Before it was an issue of RU not being cool/sexy enough, not having the tradition, or booster who were willing to do shady things to get a player to commit. Now all that WE have to do is raised the $$$$ using the current legal methods. We don't need to be 1 to compete, just be in the top 15-25 and be good at player evaluation and development.

I do think NIL is not going to be good long term for the bottom 10-20% of the players who might not have a school to attend to when in the past they could at least get a free education.

We don’t have 20K season ticket holders, it’s 20K+ season tickets, held by 5,635 season ticket holders. We’re using nil to retain players, not to get them to commit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: eddynyse

Knight Shift

Heisman
May 19, 2011
89,555
87,524
113
The B1G let USC in for free, and they seem to be in a great position to capitalize on NIL.


The problem is that there are no rules or guidelines. After the Supreme Court decision, we have the Wild West. If the NCAA had their **** together, there would have been a set of rules or guidelines to follow.

Interesting discussion here.

 

Plum Street

Heisman
Jun 21, 2009
27,306
23,010
0
The fandom you talk about will only support Rutgers if it treats its players like it’s in the Patriot League while collecting those B10 checks.
I am just interested to see what longtime fans that say they’re done are gonna do . Does that mean watch and not contribute to NIL? Not watch ? Go to games and tailgates only to watch us get our asses kicked in the game ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: eddynyse

1devotedfan

Sophomore
Nov 20, 2002
1,247
151
0
I disagree with this. Per last year we had 20,000+ season ticket holders. if 10k+ contribute the hypothetical amount that would be 12Mil +. Add to that the additional contribution for non-season ticket holders and corporate sponsors and you are probably looking at $15-20Mil per year.

Below is the link to the total season tickets sales from last year.

I think NIL will give us a better chance than what we had in the past. Before it was an issue of RU not being cool/sexy enough, not having the tradition, or booster who were willing to do shady things to get a player to commit. Now all that WE have to do is raised the $$$$ using the current legal methods. We don't need to be 1 to compete, just be in the top 15-25 and be good at player evaluation and development.

I do think NIL is not going to be good long term for the bottom 10-20% of the players who might not have a school to attend to when in the past they could at least get a free education.

Eddy,
I can't read the link. It is premium.
I send my $ to RU, not NJ.com
 
  • Like
Reactions: eddynyse

JayDogSmooth

All-Conference
Aug 18, 2006
8,096
3,789
0
How would I know. Do you know?
See that’s where it gets murky, as GS openly said that we are not involved with paying high school kids. He also said that we are in the retention phase, and did not rule up paying future high school kids. I would argue that this guy certainly deserved and hopefully was offered some kind of an IL deal, as you need these kids to come in and set the precedent, especially the in-state kids I can keep other kids home and show that we are committed to winning
 
  • Like
Reactions: eddynyse

Jtung230

Heisman
Jun 30, 2005
19,262
12,398
82
If you are suggesting that RU football players aren’t expected to pursue an education as student-athletes then let’s move on from college football altogether because RU and the state of NJ doesn’t need to own a semi-pro football team.
You should read the post I was responding to. I’m not sure how you got that from my reply.
 
Jun 7, 2001
36,442
43,797
113
The B1G let USC in for free, and they seem to be in a great position to capitalize on NIL.


The problem is that there are no rules or guidelines. After the Supreme Court decision, we have the Wild West. If the NCAA had their **** together, there would have been a set of rules or guidelines to follow.

Interesting discussion here.


The B1G let USC in for free because what they bring to the table will make everyone whole as a result of the incremental revenue that will be realized. They will do the same for Notre Dame, if ND wants to come.
 

pmvon

All-American
Jan 30, 2007
7,614
7,169
0
When first proposed it was framed as universities make all this money off the student athletes and they should get their fare share. So why doesn't the university just pay them from the big piles of loot they're making? Why hit the fans up?

Then it was let them make money for lending out their likeness for local ads.

Now it's just give us money so we can pay some kid to come here. Are these even tax deductible? You're essentially paying someone a salary.
Because most universities like Rutgers lose money on sports. They make revenue which different than making money.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Plum Street

pmvon

All-American
Jan 30, 2007
7,614
7,169
0
Rutgers basketball lands their best recruit in years. Kids all over the country are returning to school to get a better education instead of leaving early. (Caleb McConnell included). Rutgers football head coach comes out and says WORD FOR WORD what I’ve been saying all along. People were cheating before and they’re cheating now. What WE can do at Rutgers is build a strong *** community built on fan experiences, interactions and networking. That’s what we are building at https://knightsociety.io/ i recommend you join our wait list! You don’t want to pool together money for athletes? Great, me neither. All members in knight society are going to get the fan experience of a lifetime. athletes will get a chance to interact and network with their biggest supporters like no other school gets. So no, it won’t be millions of dollars. But the experience that athletes will get from this could be worth millions in the future and that’s what we’re aiming for to start.

College sports has and always will be a business. I find it interesting that you are only upset once the athletes take part in that business. Tens of Thousands of lives are going to change because of NIL. Sure it’s been ugly at times but there’s also been twice as many beautiful stories to come from it too. Instead of complaining let’s think of ways that we would want to utilize a players NIL. What’s valuable to you? Maybe a 30 minute phone call from your favorite player? Watching a basketball game with your favorite player? Or football game? Having an athlete show up to your kid or grandkids birthday party? Video games? And maybe you don’t want any of this which is fine but that is all stuff that would be valuable to super fans. More creativity, less complaining.
Getting a free education has been changing lives for decades.
 

LETSGORU91_

All-American
Jan 29, 2017
6,500
7,245
0
Rutgers basketball lands their best recruit in years. Kids all over the country are returning to school to get a better education instead of leaving early. (Caleb McConnell included). Rutgers football head coach comes out and says WORD FOR WORD what I’ve been saying all along. People were cheating before and they’re cheating now. What WE can do at Rutgers is build a strong *** community built on fan experiences, interactions and networking. That’s what we are building at https://knightsociety.io/ i recommend you join our wait list! You don’t want to pool together money for athletes? Great, me neither. All members in knight society are going to get the fan experience of a lifetime. athletes will get a chance to interact and network with their biggest supporters like no other school gets. So no, it won’t be millions of dollars. But the experience that athletes will get from this could be worth millions in the future and that’s what we’re aiming for to start.

College sports has and always will be a business. I find it interesting that you are only upset once the athletes take part in that business. Tens of Thousands of lives are going to change because of NIL. Sure it’s been ugly at times but there’s also been twice as many beautiful stories to come from it too. Instead of complaining let’s think of ways that we would want to utilize a players NIL. What’s valuable to you? Maybe a 30 minute phone call from your favorite player? Watching a basketball game with your favorite player? Or football game? Having an athlete show up to your kid or grandkids birthday party? Video games? And maybe you don’t want any of this which is fine but that is all stuff that would be valuable to super fans. More creativity, less complaining.
I appreciate you responding. I hadn't noticed your input as of late (but I wasnt specifically searching either) to find your latest views on NIL now that we hear of pretty much outright buying of players. You misinterpreted my response as well. I'm not against players benefitting from NIL, but unfortunately the abuses for the intent which NIL was made are taking those instances to forefront of the conversation. And that is what I wanted your input on. As an aside, you mentioned getting our best MBB recruit and players staying in school as a benefit of NIL. Maybe I'm just a little too old school, but the players you cited, plus hundreds of thousands of others across the country, benefit from scholarships to receive free/reduced tuition and accommodations. With NIL, athletes are now expecting to be paid on top of the other benefits they are already receiving to commit their "loyalty" to an institution. What happens when the next big offer comes along from a wealthy fanbase and hoards the best players? That loyalty will vanish for a good amount pretty quickly. Basically, its going to frequently come down to who is the highest bidder (probably the case with Bisontis). With the NCAA transfer rules/portal and NIL, this will not age well IMO. There isnt an endless supply of money to sustain a bidding war for many institutions...at least not from the fanbase. Again, I'm not against NIL and the way it seemed it was intended and you made many good points how it could benefit fans and athletes. I wanted your viewpoints on the ugliness some of it has become as you have had a hand in the game from the very beginning.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bac2therac

RU#1fan

Heisman
Mar 7, 2003
23,747
12,425
113
We don’t have 20K season ticket holders, it’s 20K+ season tickets, held by 5,635 season ticket holders. We’re using nil to retain players, not to get them to commit.
We currently have more than just 5,635 season ticketholders.
 
  • Like
Reactions: eddynyse

Geo_Baker_1

All-Conference
Apr 1, 2022
331
3,231
71
Getting a free education has been changing lives for decades.
Agreed. But If you aren’t inside high major d1 money making sports then you wouldn’t understand. Do you remember the UNC fake classes scandal? It happens everywhere. Athletes are expected to perform in their sports first because that’s what brings the money in. Rutgers is one of the few schools that is pretty good about placing student athletes in good courses but it still comes to a point where players have to make a choice if they want to take that difficult major or go an easier route and take their sport more seriously. As competitors 99 percent of us take the easier school route as a sacrifice for our sport. This ends up hurting kids farther down the line. NIL not only keeps kids in college but also creates a new form of education on business, taxes, marketing, networking, etc… those communication and sports management degrees that every athlete is cake walking through doesn’t exactly create large wealth opportunities down the line. If they weren’t sacrificing for their sport and had more time to explore I’m sure most athletes would choose different degrees. And yes it’s the route WE chose and the sacrifices that we made. But NIL should still always be allowed and should be encouraged considering the sacrifices
 

RUBOB72

All-American
Aug 5, 2004
23,385
7,924
0
If we win more than we lose under this new (uncontrolled ) system then fantastic. Meanwhile let’s see what happens when malfeasance enters the overall picture… and it very well could.